Dimensional profiling of psychopathology in children and adolescents based on the K-SADS-PL and an analysis of the construct validity of two ADHD symptom dimensions

References

• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington (DC): APA; 2013. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgleish T, Black M, Johnston D, et al. Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: current status and future directions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020;88(3):179–195. doi:10.1037/ccp0000482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchaine TP. Taxometrics and developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2003;15(3):501–527. doi:10.1017/S0954579403000270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(7):748–751. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, et al. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017;126(4):454–477. doi:10.1037/abn0000258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu BC, Temkin AB, Toffey K. 2016. Gasol. Oxford handbooks online. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935291.013.10.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RF, Eaton NR. Transdiagnostic factors of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(1):27–29. doi:10.1002/wps.20175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach TM. The Child Behavior Checklist and related instruments. In: The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1999. p. 429–466.
   Google Scholar
• DuPaul GJ, Power TJ, Anastopoulos AD, et al. 1998. ADHD rating scale—IV: checklists, norms, and clinical interpretation. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosini PJ. Historical development and present status of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39(1):49–58. doi:10.1097/00004583-200001000-00016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, et al. Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(7):980–988. doi:10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend L, Kobak K, Kearney C, et al. Development of three web-based computerized versions of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia child psychiatric diagnostic interview: preliminary validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(2):309–325. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR. Criterion-related construct validity. Psychometrika. 1989;54(4):625–633. doi:10.1007/BF02296400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Validity and objectivity in health-related scales: analysis by graphical loglinear Rasch models. In: von Davier M, Carstensen CH, editors. Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 329–346. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49839-3_21.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz-Larsen K, Kreiner S, Lomholt RK. Mini-mental status examination: mixed Rasch model item analysis derived two different cognitive dimensions of the MMSE. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(3):268–279. Epub 2006 Aug 10. PMID: 17292021. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baandrup L, Allerup P, Nielsen MØ, et al. Scalability of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in first-episode schizophrenia assessed by Rasch models. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022;146(1):21–35. doi:10.1111/acps.13434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen T, Elklit A, Vang ML, et al. Cross-cultural validity and psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) in a clinical refugee sample. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2172256. doi:10.1080/20008066.2023.2172256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadzadeh P, Rosenberg JB, Vinding R, et al. Effects of prenatal nutrient supplementation and early life exposures on neurodevelopment at age 10: a randomised controlled trial - the COPSYCH study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e047706. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047706.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text rev. Washington (DC): APA; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Burt KB, Van Dulmen MHM, Carlivati J, et al. Mediating links between maternal depression and offspring psychopathology: the importance of independent data. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005;46(5):490–499. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00367.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BUPDK. n.d. BUP. [cited 2023 Jan 20]. Available from: https://bupnet.dk/dokumentsamling/klinisk/
   Google Scholar
• Bisgaard H, Vissing NH, Carson CG, et al. Deep phenotyping of the unselected COPSAC2010 birth cohort study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(12):1384–1394. doi:10.1111/cea.12213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner S. The Rasch model for dichotomous items. In: Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, editors. Rasch models health. London: ISTE and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013. p. 5–26. doi:10.1002/9781118574454.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute for Educational Research; 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch G. On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. The Regents of the University of California. 1961. Available from: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsmsp/1200512895
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Analysis of local dependence and multidimensionality in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2004;33(6):1239–1276. doi:10.1081/STA-120030148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson B. Uniform DIF and DIF defined by differences in item response functions. J Educ Behav Stat. 1998;23(3):244–253. doi:10.3102/10769986023003244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen EB. A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika. 1973;38(1):123–140. doi:10.1007/BF02291180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner S. A note on item-restscore association in Rasch models. Appl Psychol Measur. 2011;35(7):557–561. doi:10.1177/0146621611410227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Item screening in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Psychometrika. 2011;76(2):228–256. doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9203-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelderman H. Loglinear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika. 1984;49(2):223–245. doi:10.1007/BF02294174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton M, Marais I, Christensen KB. Dimensionality. In: Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, editors. Rasch models health. London: ISTE and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013. p. 137–158. doi:10.1002/9781118574454.ch9.
   Google Scholar
• Hamon A, Mesbah M. Questionnaire reliability under the rasch model. In: Mesbah M, Cole BF, Lee MLT, editors. Statistical methods for quality of life studies. Design, measurement and analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-36250_13.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Person parameter estimation and measurement in Rasch models. In: Christensen KB ,Kreiner S, Mesbah M, editors. Rasch models health. London: ISTE and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013. p. 63–78. doi:10.1002/9781118574454.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57(1):289–300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner S. Introduction to DIGRAM. Copenhagen: Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner S, Nielsen T. Item analysis in DIGRAM 3.04. Part I: guided tours. Research report 2013/06. University of Copenhagen, Department of Public Health; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Michelini G, Palumbo IM, DeYoung CG, et al. Linking RDoC and HiTOP: a new interface for advancing psychiatric nosology and neuroscience. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;86:102025. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton K, McDonnell CG, Hayden EP, et al. Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology measurement: recommendations for measure selection, data analysis, and participant recruitment. J Abnorm Psychol. 2020;129(1):21–28. doi:10.1037/abn0000464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellersgaard D, Jessica Plessen K, Richardt Jepsen J, et al. Psychopathology in 7‐year‐old children with familial high risk of developing schizophrenia spectrum psychosis or bipolar disorder – the danish high risk and resilience study ‐ VIA 7, a population‐based cohort study. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(2):210–219. doi:10.1002/wps.20527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen M, Søndergaard A, Brandt JM, et al. Mental disorders in preadolescent children at familial high-risk of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder – a four-year follow-up study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022;63(9):1046–1056. doi:10.1111/jcpp.13548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar