167
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Psychometric validation of the Danish version of the Major Depression Inventory using data from the Lolland-Falster health study (LOFUS)

, , &
Pages 392-401 | Received 28 Nov 2023, Accepted 08 Mar 2024, Published online: 28 Mar 2024

References

  • Smith S, Weldring T. Patient-reported outcomes (pros) and patient-reported outcome measures (proms). Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61–68. doi: 10.4137/HSI.S11093.
  • Krogsgaard MR, Brodersen J, Christensen KB, et al. What is a PROM and why do we need it? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(5):967–971. doi: 10.1111/sms.13892.
  • Churruca K, Pomare C, Ellis LA, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect. 2021;24(4):1015–1024. doi: 10.1111/hex.13254.
  • Newton PE, Shaw SD. Validity in educational & psychological assessment. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014. doi: 10.4135/9781446288856
  • Fried EI, Nesse RM. Depression sum-scores don’t add up: why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential. BMC Med. 2015;13:72. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0325-4.
  • Jöreskog KG. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1969;34(2):183–202. doi: 10.1007/BF02289343.
  • Linden WJ, Hambleton RK, (eds.). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer Verlag; 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6.
  • Christensen K., Kreiner S, Mesbah M, (eds.). Rasch models in health. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012. doi: 10.1002/9781118574454.
  • Lazarsfeld P. Latent structure analysis. Houghton, Mifflin: New York; 1968)
  • Holland PW, Wainer H, (eds.). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1993. doi: 10.4324/9780203357811.
  • Bech P, Wermuth L. Applicability and validity of the major depression inventory in patients with parkinson’s disease. Nordic J Psychiatr. 1998;52(4):305–310. doi: 10.1080/08039489850149741.
  • Bech P, Christensen EM, Vinberg M, et al. The performance of the revised major depression inventory for self-reported severity of depression - implications for the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Psychother Psychosom. 2013;82(3):187–188. doi: 10.1159/000346456.
  • Bech P, Rasmussen N-A, Olsen LR, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of the major depression inventory, using the present state examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord. 2001;66(2–3):159–164. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00309-8.
  • Bech P, Timmerby N, Martiny K, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the major depression inventory (MDI) as depression severity scale using the LEAD (longitudinal expert assessment of all data) as index of validity. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0529-3.
  • Olsen LR, Jensen DV, Noerholm V, et al. The internal and external validity of the major depression inventory in measuring severity of depressive states. Psychol Med. 2003;33(2):351–356. doi: 10.1017/S0033291702006724.
  • Nielsen MG, Ørnbøl E, Vestergaard M, et al. The construct validity of the major depression inventory: a Rasch analysis of a self-rating scale in primary care. J Psychosom Res. 2017;97:70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.04.001.
  • Cuijpers P, Dekker J, Noteboom A, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the major depression inventory in outpatients. BMC Psychiatry. 2007;7:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-39.
  • Konstantinidis A, Martiny K, Bech P, et al. A comparison of the major depression inventory (MDI) and the beck depression inventory (BDI) in severely depressed patients. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2010;15(1):56–61. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2010.507870.
  • Hovaldt HB, Nielsen T, Dammeyer J. Validity and reliability of the major depression inventory for persons with dual sensory loss. Innov Aging. 2018;2(1):igy010. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igy010.
  • Amris K, Omerovic E, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, et al. The validity of self-rating depression scales in patients with chronic widespread pain: a Rasch analysis of the major depression inventory. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016;45(3):236–246. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1067712.
  • Christensen KS, Oernboel E, Nielsen MG, et al. Diagnosing depression in primary care: a rasch analysis of the major depression inventory. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019;37(2):256–263. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608039.
  • Olsen LR, Mortensen EL, Bech P. Prevalence of major depression and stress indicators in the Danish general population. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;109(2):96–103. doi: 10.1046/j.0001-690x.2003.00231.x.
  • Thorsen SV, Rugulies R, Hjarsbech PU, et al. The predictive value of mental health for long-term sickness absence: the major depression inventory (MDI) and the mental health inventory (MHI-5) compared. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13, 1-7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-115.
  • Ellervik C, Kvetny J, Christensen KS, et al. Prevalence of depression, quality of life and antidepressant treatment in the Danish general suburban population study. Nord J Psychiatry. 2014;68(7):507–512. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.877074.
  • Otiende M, Abubakar A, Mochamah G, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the major depression inventory among young people living in coastal Kenya. Wellcome Open Res. 2017;2:113. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12620.1.
  • Lundin A, Möller J, Forsell Y. The major depression inventory for diagnosing according to DSM-5 and ICD-11: psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023;32(4):e1966. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1966.
  • Pedersen HS, Christensen KB, Prior A, et al. A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version: a ¡scp¿danish¡/scp¿ validation study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024;149(3):267–278. doi: 10.1111/acps.13656.
  • The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. 1993. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Fountoulakis K, Iacovides A, Kleanthous S, et al. Reliability, validity and psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the major depression inventory. BMC Psychiatry. 2003;3:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-3-2.
  • Fawzi MH, Fawzi MM, Abu-Hindi W. Arabic version of the major depression inventory as a diagnostic tool: reliability and concurrent and discriminant validity. East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(4):304–310. doi: 10.26719/2012.18.4.304.
  • Jepsen R, Egholm CL, Brodersen J, et al. Lolland-falster health study: study protocol for a household-based prospective cohort study. Scand J Public Health. 2018;48(4):382–390. doi: 10.1177/1403494818799613.
  • Ministry of Economics- and Interior. Key figures of municipalities [Public Database]. Økonomi- og Indenrigsministeriet. www.noegletal.dk. Accessed: 2018-02-20
  • Nilsson L, Tennant A. Past and present issues in Rasch analysis: the functional independence measure (fimTM) revisited. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(10):884–891. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0871.
  • Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? when should it be applied, and what should one look for in a rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(8):1358–1362. doi: 10.1002/art.23108.
  • Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the rasch measurement model: an example using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (hads). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46(Pt 1):1–18. doi: 10.1348/014466506X96931.
  • Christensen K, Comins JD, Krogsgaard MR, et al. Psychometric validation of PROM instruments. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(6):1225–1238. doi: 10.1111/sms.13908.
  • Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Graphical rasch models. In: Mesbah, M., Cole, F.C., Lee, M.T. editors. Statistical methods for quality of life studies. Boston, MA: Springer; 2002 p 187–203. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3625-0_15.
  • Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Validity and objectivity in health-related scales: analysis by graphical loglinear Rasch models. In: von Davier, M., Carstensen, C.H. editors. Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. New York, NY: Springer; 2007. p 329–346. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-49839-3_21.
  • Kreiner S, Christensen KB. Item screening in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Psychometrika. 2011;76(2):228–256. doi: 10.1007/s11336-011-9203-y.
  • Svetina D, Rutkowski L, Rutkowski D. Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: an illustration using M plus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Struct Equ Modeling: A Multidiscip J. 2020;27(1):111–130. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776.
  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. Series B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300. doi: 10.2307/2346101.
  • Borsboom D, Cramer AOJ. Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9(1):91–121. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608.
  • Hjarsbech PU, Andersen RV, Christensen KB, et al. Clinical and non-clinical depressive symptoms and risk of long-term sickness absence among female employees in the Danish eldercare sector. J Affect Disord. 2011;129(1-3):87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.033.
  • Rugulies R, Hjarsbech PU, Aust B, et al. To what extent do single symptoms from a depression rating scale predict risk of long-term sickness absence among employees who are free of clinical depression? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;86(7):735–739. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0797-x.