The Triple Helix in the context of global change: dynamics and challenges

References

• Abramo, G., d’Angelo, C., Di Costa, F. and Solazzi, M. (2009) ‘University–industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination’, Technovation, 29, 6, pp.498–507.10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrweiler, P., Pyka, A. and Gilbert, N. (2011) ‘A new model for university–industry links in knowledge-based economies’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 2, pp.218–35.10.1111/jpim.2011.28.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, M. (2005) ‘The evolution of the incubator movement in Brazil’, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1, 2, pp.258–77.10.1504/IJTG.2005.007054
   Google Scholar
• Beccatini, G. (2003) ‘The development of Tuscany: industrial districts’ in Beccatini, G., Bellandi, M., dei Ottati, G. and Sforzi, F. (eds) From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M. (eds) (1998) Regional Innovation Systems, University College London Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Branscomb, L. (1993) ‘The national technology policy debate’ in Branscomb, L. (ed.) Empowering Technology: Implementing a US Strategy, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp.1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action, Academic Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. (1999) ‘Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: the role of knowledge management’, Technovation, 19, 4, pp.219–31.10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00101-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E., Alexander, J. and Ioannidis, A. (2000) ‘Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government–university–industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France’, Technovation, 20, 9, pp.477–88.10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00162-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. and Campbell, D. (2009) ‘“Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st Century fractal innovation ecosystem’, International Journal of Technology Management, 46, pp.201–34.10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B. (2006) ‘Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature’, Research Policy, 35, 1, pp.56–67.10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organization Pathways of Transformation, Pergamon, Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1989) ‘Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D’, Economic Journal, 99, 397, pp.569–96.10.2307/2233763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1992) ‘Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe’, Geoforum, 23, 3, pp.365–82.10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. and Leydesdorff, L. (2006) ‘Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: the construction of advantages’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 1, pp.5–15.10.1007/s10961-005-5009-3
   Google Scholar
• Dangelico, R., Garavelli, A. and Petruzzelli, A. (2010) ‘A system dynamics model to analyze technology districts’ evolution in a knowledge-based perspective’, Technovation, 30, 2, pp.142–53.10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dei Ottati, G. (2003) ‘Local governance and industrial districts’ competitive advantage’ in Beccatini, G., Bellandi, M., dei Ottati, G. and Sforzi, F. (eds) From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.184–209.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (1994) ‘Academic–industry relations: a sociological paradigm for economic development’ in Leydesdorff, L. and van den Besselaar, P. (eds) Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, Pinter, London, pp.139–51.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2002) MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science, Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203216675
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2008) The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government in Action, Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203929605
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1995) ‘The Triple Helix – university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development’, EASST Review, 14, 1, pp.14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) ‘The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations’, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp.109–23.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Terra, B. (2000) ‘The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm’, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp.313–30.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union (2011) Connecting Universities to Regional Growth: A Practical Guide, available from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/universities2011/universities2011_en.pdf [ accessed April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Verspagen, B. (eds) (2009) Innovation, Path Dependency and Policy. The Norwegian Case, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M., Kostas, S., Driver, S. and Mello, C. (1998) ‘Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans’, Nature, 391, 6669, pp.806–11.10.1038/35888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2004) The Economics of Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987) Technology Policy, and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. and Perez, C. (1988) ‘Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour’ in Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (eds) Technological Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp.38–66.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (1997) The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fujisue, K. (1998) ‘Promotion of academia–industry cooperation in Japan – establishing the “law of promoting technology transfer from university to industry” in Japan’, Technovation, 18, 6, pp.371–81.10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00055-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, B. (2010) ‘Innovative network in transition: from the fittest to the richest’, available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1649967 [ accessed April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. and Gingras, Y. (2000) ‘The place of universities in the system of knowledge production’, Research Policy, 29, 2, pp.273–78.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00065-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hallencreutz, D. and Lundequist, P. (2003) ‘Spatial clustering and the potential for policy practice: experiences from cluster-building processes in Sweden’, European Planning Studies, 11, 5, pp.533–47.10.1080/09654310303654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova, I. and Leydesdorff, L. (2014a) ‘Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, pp.143–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova, I. and Leydesdorff, L. (2014b) ‘Redundancy generation in university–industry–government relations: the Triple Helix modeled, measured, and simulated’, Scientometrics, 99, 3, pp.927–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, M. (2006) ‘Utilization of social science knowledge in science policy: systems of innovation, Triple Helix and VINNOVA’, Social Science Information, 45, 3, pp.431–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2009a) ‘W. Ross Ashby’s information theory: a bit of history, some solutions to problems, and what we face today’, International Journal of General Systems, 38, 2, pp.189–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2009b) ‘Information of interactions in complex systems’, International Journal of General Systems, 38, 6, pp.669–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K., Park, H., So, M. and Leydesdorff, L. (2012) ‘Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea’, Scientometrics, 90, 1, pp.163–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton Smith, H. and Ho, K. (2006) ‘Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories’ spin-off companies’, Research Policy, 35, 10, pp.1554–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengyel, B. and Leydesdorff, L. (2011) ‘Regional innovation systems in Hungary: the failing synergy at the national level’, Regional Studies, 45, 5, pp.677–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewontin, R. (2000) The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2006) The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated, Universal Publishers, Boca Raton FL.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2010) ‘The knowledge-based economy and the Triple Helix model’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, pp.367–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Bornmann, L. (2012) ‘Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 7, pp.1442–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Deakin, M. (2011) ‘The Triple-Helix model of smart cities: a neo-evolutionary perspective’, Journal of Urban Technology, 18, 2, pp.53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., Dolfsma, W. and Van der Panne, G. (2006) ‘Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of Triple-Helix relations among “technology, organization, and territory”’, Research Policy, 35, 2, pp.181–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Fritsch, M. (2006) ‘Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics’, Research Policy, 35, 10, pp.1538–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Ivanova, I. (2014) ‘Mutual redundancies in inter-human communication systems: steps towards a calculus of processing meaning’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 2, pp.386–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Meyer, M. (2010) ‘The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh-Dole effect’, Scientometrics, 83, 2, pp.355–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Rafols, I. (2011) ‘How do emerging technologies conquer the world? An exploration of patterns of diffusion and network formation’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 5, pp.846–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Strand, Ø. (2013) ‘The Swedish system of innovation: regional synergies in a knowledge-based economy’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 9, pp.1890–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Sun, Y. (2009) ‘National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: university–industry–government versus international co-authorship relations’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 4, pp.778–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and van den Besselaar, P. (eds) (1994) Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Zhou, P. (2014) ‘Measuring the knowledge-based economy of China in terms of synergy among technological, organizational, and geographic attributes of firms’, Scientometrics, 98, 3, pp.1703–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, C. (1982) ‘The Triple Helix – NIH, industry, and the academic world’, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 55, pp.239–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, P. (2011) ‘Is silence still golden? Mapping the RNAi patent landscape’, Nature Biotechnology, 29, 6, pp.493–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988) ‘Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation’ in Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (eds) Technological Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp.349–69.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L. and Winter, S. (1999) ‘“History-friendly” models of industry evolution: the computer industry’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8, 1, pp.3–35.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, W. (1954) ‘Multivariate information transmission’, Psychometrika, 19, 2, pp.97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., Grant, K., Morlacchi, P. and Weckowska, D. (2014) ‘Triple Helix indicators as an emergent area of enquiry: a bibliometric perspective’, Scientometrics, 99, 1, pp.151–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. and Sent, E. (2007) ‘The commercialization of science, and the response of STS’ in Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M. and Wajcman, J. (eds) Handbook of Science, Technology and Society Studies, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp.635–89.
   Google Scholar
• MIT Technology Licensing Office (2006) Licensing for RNAi Patents, available from http://web.mit.edu/tlo/www/industry/RNAi_patents_technology.html [ accessed April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (ed.) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, D. (1977) America by Design, Knopf, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F. and Powell, W. (2002) ‘A comparison of US and European university–industry relations in the life sciences’, Management Science, 48, 1, pp.24–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Hong, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2005) ‘A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and The Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators’, Scientometrics, 65, 1, pp.3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruzzelli, A. (2011) ‘The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations: a joint-patent analysis’, Technovation, 31, 7, pp.309–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W., White, D., Koput, K. and Owen Smith, J. (2005) ‘Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences’, American Journal of Sociology, 110, 4, pp.1132–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. and Scharnhorst, A. (eds) (2009) Innovation Networks: New Approaches in Modelling and Analyzing, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, M., Zawdie, G. and Malairaja, C. (2008) ‘The Triple Helix strategy for universities in developing countries: the experiences in Malaysia and Algeria’, Science and Public Policy, 35, 6, pp.431–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sábato, J. (1975) El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia-technología-desarrollo-dependencia, Paidós, Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. ([1939] 1964) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of Capitalist Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, T. (2002) ‘The Triple Helix and new production of knowledge: prepackaged thinking on science and technology’, Social Studies of Science, 32, 4, pp.599–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soete, L. and ter Weel, B. (1999) ‘Schumpeter and the knowledge-based economy: on technology and competition policy’, Research Memoranda 004, MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, available from http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/rmpdf/1999/rm1999-004.pdf [ accessed April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (1997) The Regional World – Territorial Development in a Global Economy, Guilford Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, Ø. and Leydesdorff, L. (2013) ‘Where is synergy in the Norwegian innovation system indicated? Triple Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 3, pp.471–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, J. and Hopkins, M. (2006) ‘Towards a method for evaluating technological expectations: revealing uncertainty in gene silencing technology discourse’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18, 3, pp.345–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulanowicz, R. (1986) Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology, Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ulanowicz, R. (2009) A Third Window: Natural Life Beyond Newton and Darwin, Templeton Foundation Press, West Conshohocken PA.
   Google Scholar
• Venditti, M., Reale, E. and Leydesdorff, L. (2013) ‘Disclosure of university research to third parties: a non-market perspective on an Italian university’, Science and Public Policy, 40, 6, pp.792–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. (1979) ‘The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, 4, pp.255–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viale, R. and Campodall’Orto, S. (2002) ‘An evolutionary Triple Helix to strengthen academy–industry relations: suggestions from European regions’, Science and Public Policy, 29, 3, pp.154–68.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (1984) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Windrum, P. (1999) ‘Simulation models of technological innovation: a review’, American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 10, pp.1531–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, R. (2008) Information Theory and Network Coding, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar