Avoiding evolutionary inefficiencies in innovation networks

References

• Abernathy, W. and Utterback, J. (1975) ‘A dynamic model of process and product innovation’, Omega, 3, 6, pp.639–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrweiler, P., Gilbert, N. and Pyka, A. (2011) ‘A new model for university–industry links in knowledge-based economies’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, pp.218–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrweiler, P., Schilperoord, M., Pyka, A. and Gilbert, N. (2014) ‘Testing policy options for Horizon 2020 with SKIN’ in Ahrweiler, P., Gilbert, N. and Pyka, A. (eds) Simulating Knowledge Dynamics in Innovation Networks, Understanding Complex Systems, Springer, Berlin, pp.155–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G. (2000) ‘Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, pp.425–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1951/1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1959) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, Economics Division P-1856, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica CA.
   Google Scholar
• Barabasi, A. and Albert, R. (1999) ‘Emergence of scaling in random networks’, Science, 286, 5439, pp.509–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, T. and Pyka, A. (2011) ‘Innovation networks’ in Krafft, J. and Dietrich, M. (eds) Handbook on the Theory of Firms, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.466–84.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (1992) Structural Holes, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Cantner, U. and Pyka, A. (2001) ‘Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective’, Research Policy, 30, pp.759–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capozzi, M. (2010) ‘Leadership and innovation’, Development Outreach, 21, 1, pp.25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1989) ‘Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D’, Economic Journal, 99, pp.569–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. and Morgan, K. (1998) The Associational Economy: Firms, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, R. (1988) ‘Technological opportunities and industrial organization’ in Dosi, G. et al. (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp.295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. and March, J. (1963) A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1982) ‘Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technological change’, Research Policy, 11, pp.147–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1988) ‘The nature of the innovative process’ in Dosi, G. et al. (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp.221–38.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, G. (1991) ‘Deregulation, innovative entry and structural diversity as a source of stable and rapid economic growth’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, pp.49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Erdmann, G. (1993) Elemente Einer Evolutorischen Innovationstheorie, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Ergas, H. (1987) ‘The importance of technology policy’ in Dasgupta, P. and Stoneman, P. (eds) Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission (2008) The Concept of Clusters and Cluster Policies and their Role for Competitiveness and Innovation: Main Statistical Results and Lessons Learned, INNOVA/PRO INNO paper 9, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987) Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Gilsing, V. and Nooteboom, B. (2006) ‘Exploration and exploitation in biotechnology industries: the case of pharmaceutical biotechnology’, Research Policy, 35, pp.1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusch, H. and Pyka, A. (2007) ‘Principles of neo-Schumpeterian economics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31, pp.275–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. and Allen, T. (1982) ‘Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups’, R&D Management, 12, pp.7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, S. and Rosenberg, N. (1986) ‘An overview of innovation’ in Landau, R. and Rosenberg, N. (eds) The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, National Academic Press, Washington DC, pp.275–305.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Hart, Schaffner and Marx Prize Essay 31, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. (ed.) (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2004) Sectoral Systems of Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, S. (1994) ‘Evolutionary economics and technology policy’, Economic Journal, 104, pp.931–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, S. (1995) ‘Technology systems and technological policy in an evolutionary framework’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, pp.25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, S. and Georghiou, L. (1997) Equilibrium and Evolutionary Foundations of Technology Policy, Discussion Paper 3, Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, F. (2004) ‘The role of the state in evolutionary economics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, pp.847–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mytelka, L. and Smith, K. (2002) ‘Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process’, Research Policy, 31, pp.1467–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (ed.) (1993) National Systems of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (2009) ‘Building effective innovation systems versus dealing with market failures as ways of thinking about technology policy’ in Foray, D. (ed.) The New Economics of Technology Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2009) Open Innovation in Global Networks, OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Pelikan, P. (2003) ‘Why economic policies need comprehensive evolutionary analysis’ in Pelikan, P. and Wegner, G. (eds) The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.15–45.
   Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. (2000) ‘Informal networking and industrial life cycles’, Technovation, 20, pp.25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. (2002) ‘Innovation networks in economics – from the incentive-based to the knowledge-based approaches’, European Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 3, pp.152–63.
   Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. and Windrum, P. (2003) ‘The self-organization of strategic alliances’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12, pp.245–68.
   Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. and Catherine, D. (2008) ‘Innovation networks in biotechnology’ in Patzelt, H. Brenner, T. and Audretsch, D. (eds) Handbook of Bioentrepreneurship, Springer, Berlin, pp.51–80.
   Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. and Pyka, A. (2004) ‘Economic development by the creation of new sectors’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 1, pp.1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1912) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen entwicklung, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1976) ‘From substantial to procedural rationality’ in Latsis, S. (ed.) Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.129–48.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1985) ‘What we know about the creative process’ in Kuhn, R. (ed.) Frontiers in Creative and Innovative Management, Ballinger, Cambridge MA, pp.3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1776) The Wealth of Nations, Penguin Classics [reprinted 1986].
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. (1956) ‘A contribution to the theory of economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 1, pp.65–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, R. (1957) ‘Technical change and the aggregate production function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 3, pp.312–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. (1988) ‘Technological change and the nature of the firm’ in Dosi, G. et al. (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp.263–81.
   Google Scholar