Reviewing patent policy: an exercise in futility?

References

• ACIP (Australian Council on Intellectual Property) (2003) Report on a Review of the Patenting of Business Systems, Canberra, available from http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/public-consultations/archive-of-ip-reviews/ip-reviews/Consideration-of-a-position-on-the-patenting-of-business-systems [accessed February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2014) Innovation in Australian Business, 2012–13, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, available from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/8158.0 [accessed February 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Beggs, J. (1981) ‘On the evaluation of the Australian patent system’ in Mandeville, T., Lamberton, D. and Bishop, E. (eds), The Economic Implications of Patents in Australia, Australian Patent Office, Canberra, pp.39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. (2008) Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L., Chatterjee, C. and Higgins, M. (2011) Regulation and Welfare: Evidence from Paragraph IV Generic Entry in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Working Paper 17188, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17188 [accessed February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, S., Goldberg, P. and Jia, P. (2006) ‘Estimating the effects of global patent protection in pharmaceuticals: a case study of quinolones in India’, American Economic Review, 96, 5, pp.1477–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., Nelson, R. and Walsh, J. (2000) Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not), Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552 [accessed February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. (1999) ‘Biotechnology patents, markets and morality’, European Intellectual Property Review, 21, 9, pp.431–41.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. (2010) The Global Governance of Knowledge: Patent Offices and Their Clients, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dutfield, G. (2003) Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries: A 20th Century History, Ashgate, Burlington VT.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, A. (2011) ‘From free entry to patent protection: welfare implications for the Indian pharmaceutical industry’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 1, pp.160–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, T., Nicol, D., and Gruen, N. (2013) Pharmaceutical Patents Review Report, available from http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/pdfs/2013-05-27_PPR_Final_Report.pdf [accessed May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• IP Australia (2015) Australian Intellectual Property Report, available from http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/reports/ip_report_2015/ [accessed February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• IPAC (Industrial Property Advisory Committee) (1984) Patents, Innovation and Competition in Australia, IPAC, Canberra, available from https://web.archive.org/web/20130409083841/http://www.acip.gov.au/library/Patents,%20Innovation%20and%20Competition%20in%20Australia.pdf [accessed February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. and Lerner, J. (2004) Innovation and its Discontents: How Our Broken Patents System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Kahin, B. (2003) ‘The expansion of the patent system: politics and political economy’, First Monday, 6, 1, available from http://www.firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/828 [accessed February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Lamberton, D. and Mandeville, T. (1980) ‘On patents and R&D: some observations on Australian experience’, paper presented at OECD Science and Technology Indicators Conference, STIC/80.58, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1987) ‘Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Special Issue on Microeconomics, 1987, 3, pp.783–831.
   Google Scholar
• Lunney, G. (2004) ‘Patent law, the federal circuit, and the supreme court: a quiet revolution’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 11, pp.1–79.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. (1982) The Individual Inventor in Australia, Department of Economics,University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. (2016) ‘Don Lamberton's dissenting statement of 1984’, Prometheus, 33, 4 doi: 10.1080/08109028.2016.1245948
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. and Penrose, E. (1950) ‘The patent controversy in the nineteenth century’, Journal of Economic History, 10, 1, pp.1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man, B. (2014) Overview of the Intellectual Property Government Open Data, Economic Research Paper 2, IP Australia, available from http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/uploaded-files/reports/IP_Government_Open_Data_Paper_-_Final.pdf [accessed January 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Mandeville, T. (1982a) Engineers and the Patent System: Results of a Survey of Members of the Institute of Engineers, Department of Economics, University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Mandeville, T. (1982b) Results of a Survey of Australian Industry Patent Applicants, Department of Economics, University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Mandeville, T. and Bishop, E. (1982) Economic Effects of the Patent System: Results of a Survey of Patent Attorney Clients, Department of Economics, University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Mandeville, T., Lamberton, D. and Bishop, E. (1981) ‘The use of patent information: economics of disclosure’, paper presented at ANZAAS 51st Congress, Section 24, Economics, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Mandeville, T., Lamberton, D. and Bishop, E. (1982) The Economic Effects of the Australian Patent System: A Commissioned Report to the Industrial Property Advisory Committee, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., and Wagner, S. (1981) ‘Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study’, Economic Journal, 91, 364, pp.907–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, R. and Nelson, R. (1998a) ‘The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate’, Research Policy, 27, 3, pp.273–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, R. and Nelson, R. (1998b) ‘Economic theories about the benefits and costs of patents’, Journal of Economic Issues, 32, 4, pp.1031–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moir, H. (2013a) ‘Empirical evidence on the inventive step’, European Intellectual Property Review, 35, 5, pp.246–52.
   Google Scholar
• Moir, H. (2013b) ‘Fabricating invention: the patent malfunction of Australian patent law’, Agenda, 20, 2, pp.21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, P. (2005) ‘How do patent laws influence innovation? evidence from nineteenth century world fairs’, American Economic Review, 95, 4, pp.1214–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. (1951) The Economics of the International Patent System, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore MD.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission (2010) Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements, Canberra, available from http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/trade-agreements/report [accessed February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission (2015) Intellectual Property Arrangements: Issues Paper, available from http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/intellectual-property/issues [accessed October 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Summerfield, M. (2015) ‘Can the High Court fix Australia’s obviousness problem?’, available from http://blog.patentology.com.au/2015/05/can-high-court-fix-australias.html [accessed October 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. and Silberston, Z. (1973) The Economic Impact of the Patent System: A Study of the British Experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
   Google Scholar
• Thambisetty, S. (2007) ‘Patents as credence goods’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 4, pp.707–40.
   Google Scholar