A journal is a club: a new economic model for scholarly publishing

References

• Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. (1972) ‘Production, information costs, and economic organization’, American Economic Review, 62, 5, pp.777–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. and Roberts, J. (2008) ‘Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice’, Research Policy, 37, 2, pp.353–69.10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities, Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More, Hyperion Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. (2014) Opening Access to Research, working paper, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, April.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W., Panzar, J. and Willig, R. (1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure, Harcourt Brace, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Berglas, E. (1976) ‘On the theory of clubs’, American Economic Review, 66, pp.116–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, T. (2001) ‘Free labour for costly journals’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, pp.183–98.10.1257/jep.15.4.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, C. and Bergstrom, T. (2001) ‘The economics of scholarly journal publishing’, available from http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/publishing/.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, C. and Bergstrom, T. (2004) ‘The costs and benefits of library site licenses to academic journals’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 101, pp.897–902.10.1073/pnas.0305628101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, C. and Bergstrom, T. (2006) ‘The economics of ecology journals’, Frontiers of Ecology and the Environment, 4, 9, pp.488–95.10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[488:TEOEJ]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binfield, P. (2013) ‘Open access mega-journals’, available from http://creativecommons.org.nz/2013/10/open-access-megajournals-have-they-changed-everything/ [accessed January 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Björk, B. (2012) ‘The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: a failed experiment?’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 8, pp.1496–504.10.1002/asi.v63.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (2009) A Cooperative Species, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. (1965) ‘An economic theory of clubs’, Economica, 32, 125, pp.1–14.10.2307/2552442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buranyi, S. (2017) ‘Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?’, Guardian, available from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science [accessed June 27].
   Google Scholar
• Buterin, V. (2015) ‘Visions part I: the value of blockchain technology’, available from https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/04/13/visions-part-1-the-value-of-blockchain-technology/ [accessed March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2003) Open Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, J. (2012) ‘Low acceptance rates, commercial publishing, and the future of scholarly communication’, Economics Bulletin, 32, 4, p.A37.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, J. and Wooders, M. (2009) ‘“But what have you done for me lately?” Commercial publishing, scholarly communication and open access’, Economic Analysis & Policy, 39, 1, pp.71–87.
   Google Scholar
• De Solla Price, D. (1963) Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, Little Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, E. (2016) The Viennese Students of Civilization: The Meaning and Context of Austrian Economics Reconsidered, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781316411162
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, E. (1982) The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. (2003) ‘Publishing as prostitution: choosing between one’ own ideas and academic success’, Public Choice, 116, pp.205–23.10.1023/A:1024208701874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischmann, B., Madison, M. and Strandburg, K. (2014) Governing Knowledge Commons, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N. and Røstvik, C. (2017) Untangling Academic Publishing: a History of the Relationship between Commercial Interests, Academic Prestige and the Circulation of Research, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.546100.
   Google Scholar
• Fyffe, R. and Shulenburger, D. (2002) ‘Economics as if science mattered: the BioOne business model and the transformation of scholarly publishing’, Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 26, 3, pp.231–39.10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00246-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans, J. (ed.) (2000) Publishing Economics: Analyses of the Academic Journal Market in Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, J. (2017) Scholarly Publishing and its Discontents, Core Economics Publishing, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. (1954) The Scientific Revolution: 1500–1800, Longmans, Green & Co., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Harnad, S. (1995) ‘The post-Gutenberg galaxy: how to get there from here’, Information Society, 11, 4, pp.285–91.10.1080/01972243.1995.9960203
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2015) ‘Public intellectuals: La lutte continue?’, Media International Australia, 156, pp.108–22.10.1177/1329878X1515600113
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. and Potts, J. (2014) Cultural Science: A Natural History of Stories, Demes, Knowledge and Innovation, Bloomsbury, London.
   Google Scholar
• Harvie, D. (2004) ‘Commons and communities in the university: some notes and some examples’ Commoner, available from http://www.commoner.org.uk/08harvie.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. (2001) ‘Crisis and transition: the economics of scholarly communication’, Learned Publishing, 14, 3, pp.167–76.10.1087/leap.2001.14.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. (2011) ‘The costs and potential benefits of alternative scholarly publishing models’, Information Research, 16, p.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. and Oppenheim, C. (2010) ‘The economic implications of alternative publishing models’, Prometheus, 28, 1, pp.41–54.10.1080/08109021003676359
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. and Sheehan, P. (2009) ‘Estimating the potential impacts of open access to research findings’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 39, 1, pp.127–42.10.1016/S0313-5926(09)50048-3
   Google Scholar
• Kahin, B. and Varian, H. (eds) (2000) Internet Publishing and Beyond: the Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, R., Spector, L. and McKim, G. (2002) ‘Locally controlled scholarly publishing via the internet: the guild model’, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39, 1, pp.228–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, D. (1963) ‘The economics of publishing’, Daedalus, 92, 3, pp.42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lanham, R. (2006) The Economics of Attention, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, M. and Snyder, C. (2014) ‘The economics of open-access journals’, available from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=914525.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, L. (2015) ‘Knowledge Unlatched: a global library consortium model for funding open access scholarly books’ in Hartley, J. and Qu, W. (eds) Re-Orientation: Trans-cultural, Trans-lingual Transmedia: Studies in Narrative, Language, Identity and Knowledge, Fudan University Press, Shanghai, pp.234–55.
   Google Scholar
• Neylon, C. (2015) ‘The limits on open: why knowledge is not a public good: and what to do about it’, available from http://cameronneylon.net/blog/the-limits-on-open-why-knowledge-is-not-a-public-good-and-what-to-do-about-it/.
   Google Scholar
• Neylon, C. (2016) ‘Communities need journals’, Notes and Records, 70, 4, pp.383–5.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. (2012) Orality and Literacy: Technologizing the Word, Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511807763
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. and Hess, C. (eds) (2007) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. and Ostrom, V. (1999) ‘Public goods and public choices’ in McGinnis, M. (ed.) Polycentricity and Local Public Economics, Michigan University Press, Ann Arbour, pp.75–98.
   Google Scholar
• Pagel, M. (2012) Wired for Culture, Norton, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, J., Cunningham, S., Hartley, J. and Ormerod, P. (2008) ‘Social network markets: a new definition of the creative industries’, Journal of Cultural Economics, 32, 3, pp.167–85.10.1007/s10824-008-9066-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, E. (2006) Community Media: A Global Introduction, Rowman & Littlefield, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. (1954) ‘The pure theory of public expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 4, pp.387–9.10.2307/1925895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. (2013) ‘Buchanan clubs’, Constitutional Political Economy, 24, 4, pp.265–84.10.1007/s10602-013-9148-5
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. and Tschirhart, J. (1980) ‘The economic theory of clubs: an evaluative survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, 18, pp.1481–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. and Tschirhart, J. (1997) ‘Club theory: thirty years later’, Public Choice, 93, pp.335–55.10.1023/A:1017952723093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotchmer, S. (2002) ‘Local public goods and clubs’ in Auerbach, A. and Feldstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Public Economics, 4, pp.1998–2042.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2010) ‘The shock of inclusion’, Edge, available from https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11609.
   Google Scholar
• Sturrock, J. (1998) ‘Le pauvre Sokal’, London Review of Books, 20, 14, pp.8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, M. (2015) Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy, O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, I. (1957/2001) The Rise of the Novel, University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Willinsky, J. (2005) ‘Scholarly associations and the economic viability of open access publishing’, Open Journal System Demonstration Journal, 1, p.1.
   Google Scholar
• Willinsky, J. (2006) The Access Principle: the Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Willinsky, J. (2009) ‘The stratified economics of open access’, Information Economics and Policy, 39, 1, pp.53–70.
   Google Scholar