TELEVISION FUTURES IN AUSTRALIA

NOTES AND REFERENCES

• David , Court . 1994 . Booting up the information economy . EBR: The Content Letter , 4 : 1
   Google Scholar
• Stuart , Cunningham . 1992 . Framing Culture , St. Leonards : Allen & Unwin .
   Google Scholar
• Jeff , Malpas and Gary , Wickham . 1995 . Governance and failure: on the limits of sociology . Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology , 31 ( 3 ) : 37 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• James , Carey and John , Quirk . 1989 . “ The mythos of the electronic revolution ” . In Communication as Culture , Edited by: James , Carey . 113 – 141 . Boston : Unwin Hyman .
   Google Scholar
• Carolyn Marvin, When Old Technologies Were New, Oxford University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• op. cit., pp. 1, 2, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Quoted by Daniel Czitrom, Media and the American Mind, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1982, p.77.
   Google Scholar
• Court, op. cit., p.1.
   Google Scholar
• Russell , Neuman W. 1991 . The Future of the Mass Audience , 172 New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• George , Landow . 1992 . Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology , Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press .
   Google Scholar
• See James Carey, ‘Harold Adams Innis and Marshall McLuhan’, in N. Rosenthal et al., McLuhan: Pro and Con, Pelican, Baltimore, 1972, pp.270–308; Ian Angus and Brian Shoesmith, Dependency/Space/Policy. Continuum, 7 (1), Centre for Research in Culture and Communications, Perth, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Hayne, ‘New technologies and broadcasting policies’, Communications Research Forum, Bureau of Transport and Communications Economics, Sydney, October 1995, p.21.
   Google Scholar
• ibid, p.13.
   Google Scholar
• ibid, p.25.
   Google Scholar
• Federation of Australian Commercial Television Stations (FACTS), Facts of Australian Content in Television Programme Schedules, FACTS, Sydney, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Jo Hawke, ‘Privatising the public interest: the public and the Broadcasting Services Act 1992’, in J. Craik, J. James Bailey and A. Moran (eds), Public Voices: Private Interests. Australia's Media Policy, Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, 1995, p.40.
   Google Scholar
• Tim Dwyer, ‘Pay TV policies: Are Audiences the “users” who will pay?’, in Craik, James Bailey and Moran (eds), op.cit., pp.102.
   Google Scholar
• Toby Miller, ‘Striving for difference: Commercial radio policy’, in Craik, James Bailey and Moran (eds), op.cit., p. 100.
   Google Scholar
• Barbara Herrnstein Smith, Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1988, p.112.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (ABT), Oz Content An Inquiry into Australian Content on Australian Television, Vol.1, ABT, Sydney, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Hunter, Rethinking the School, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1992, p.46.
   Google Scholar
• Tom O'Regan, Australian Television Culture, Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, 1993, pp.10–13.
   Google Scholar
• ibid, pp. 87–91.
   Google Scholar
• ibid, pp.57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Colin Hoskins and Rolf Minis, ‘Reasons for the US dominance of the international trade in television programmes’, Media, Culture and Society, 10(4), 1988, pp.499–515.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins and Minis argued that because the US had the least imported programming proportionally producers outside the US faced in the US market the highest cultural discount. This seemed to suggest that the US erected cultural barriers to the circulation of overseas programming where they needed to account for the economic incentives to indigenize — sometimes at significantly greater expense than to use cheaper English language imports.
   Google Scholar
• Television Business International, World Guide, TBI, 1990, p.508.
   Google Scholar
• FACTS, op.cit., p.10.
   Google Scholar
• Steven S. Wildman and Stephen E. Siwek, International Trade in Films and Television Programs, Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, Mass., 1988, p.37.
   Google Scholar
• op.cit, p.8.
   Google Scholar