Residential Intensification at the Interface of Market-Driven Development and Planning: Uneven Residential Intensification Outcomes in Toronto

References

• Aalbers, M.B., 2016. The financialization of housing: A political economy approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, H.R., 1909. The case for town planning. London: The National Planning and Town Planning Council.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E.R., 2014. Land-property markets and planning: A special case. Land use policy, 41, 533–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor, D.H. and Dorn, D., 2013. The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American economic review, 103, 1553–1597. doi:10.1257/aer.103.5.1553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacher, J.C., 1973. Keeping to the marketplace: the evolution of Canadian housing policy. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badger, E. and Quealy, K., 2019. Watch four decades of inequality drive American cities apart: the biggest metropolitan areas are now the most unequal. New York Times, December 2. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/02/upshot/wealth-poverty-divide-american-cities.html?algo=top_conversion&fellback=false&imp_id=911095224&action=click&module=MostPopular&pgtype=hompage
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, G., 2012. Neoliberal planning: does it really exist? In: T.-K. Tuna and G. Baeten, eds.. Contradictions of neoliberal planning: cities, policies, and politics. Dordrecht: Springer, 205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., Ed., 2017. Smart growth in a changing world. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. and McGreal, S., Eds, 1995. European cities: planning systems and property markets. London: E. and F.N. Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, L.S., 1967. Private redevelopment of the central city: processes of structural change in the city of Toronto. Chicago, IL: Department of Geography, University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, S., 2004. The emergence of ‘smart growth’ intensification in Toronto: environment and economy in the new official plan. Local Environment, 9, 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Burchfield, M. and Kramer, A., 2015. Growing pains: understanding the new reality of population and dwelling patterns in the Toronto and Vancouver regions. Toronto: Neptis Foundation. https://neptis.org/sites/default/files/growing_pains_neptisreport_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, B.W., 1989. Post-war trends in Canadian housing policy. Urban History Review, 18, 64–74. doi:10.7202/1017825ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCEA and CUI (Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis and Canadian Urban Institute), 2019. Toronto housing market analysis: from insight to action (PH 2.5 Appendix 1). Toronto: CCEA and CUI. https://toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-124480.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Darchen, S., 2013. The creative city and the redevelopment of the Toronto entertainment district: A BIA-led regeneration process. International Planning Studies, 18, 188–203. doi:10.1080/13563475.2013.774147
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, J., 2010. In the wrong place at the wrong time? Assessing some planning, transport and housing market limits to urban consolidation policies. Urban Policy and Research, 28, 487–504. doi:10.1080/08111146.2010.517158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominion Bureau of Statistics, 1958. Census 1956: population, Volume 1, general characteristics, households and families. Ottawa: DBS.
   Google Scholar
• Duany, A., Speck, J., and Lydon, M., 2010. The smart growth manual. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, A.J., 1992. Migration and social mobility: south East England as an escalator region. Regional studies, 26, 1–15. doi:10.1080/00343409212331346741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P., 2001. Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: what difference do they make? Environment & planning A, 33, 141–160. doi:10.1068/a3375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P., 2007. The urban growth centres strategy in the greater golden horseshoe: lessons from downtowns, nodes, and corridors. Toronto: Neptis Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P., et al., 2018. Achieving walkability in urban growth centres. Waterloo, Ont.: School of Planning, University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. and McSpurren, K., 2007. Smart growth and development reality: the difficult coordination of land use and transportation objectives. Urban Studies, 44, 501–523. doi:10.1080/00420980601176055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P., McSpurren, K., and Appleby, B., 2006. Wasted density? The impact of Toronto’s residential density distribution policies on public-transit use and walking. Environment & planning A, 38, 1367–1392. doi:10.1068/a37414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P. and Saboonian, S., 2019. Large multifunctional suburban centres and the transformation of the suburban realm. Journal of Urbanism, 12, 296–319.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., 2012 [2002]. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, D.K., 2001. Boom, bust and echo: profiting from the demographic shift in the 21st century. Toronto: Stoddard.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. and Hawkins, C., 2008. Giving pedestrians an edge: using street layout to influence transportation choice. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, S.A. and Rodriguez-Pose, A., 2018. Big or small cities? On city size and economic growth. Growth and change, 49, 4–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaubert, C., 2018. Firm sorting and agglomeration. American Economic Review, 108, 3117–3153. doi:10.1257/aer.20150361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertten, F., 2019. Film: push. Malmö, Sweden: WG Film AB.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. and Marvin, S., 2002. Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, I. and Lawrence, G., 2001. Neoliberalism, individualism and prospects for regional renewal. Rural Society, 11, 282–298. doi:10.5172/rsj.11.3.283
   Google Scholar
• Guilluy, C., 2018. No society: la fin de la classe moyenne occidentale. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., 2006. Sustainability: planning’s saving grace or road to perdition? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 208–221. doi:10.1177/0739456X06289359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurran, N. and Bramley, G., 2017. Urban planning and the housing market: international perspectives for policy and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, M. and Moranis, S. (2019) Condos cost more than houses per square foot, but in some markets the gap is closing. Financial Post, September 4. https://business.financialpost.com/real-estate/condos-cost-more-than-houses-per-square-foot-but-in-some-markets-the-gap-is-closing
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., 1980. Great planning disasters. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D., 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler Series B – Human Geography, 71, 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, M., 2000. The acceptability if urban intensification. In: K. Williams, E. Burton, and M. Jenks, eds.. Achieving sustainable urban form. London: Spon Press, 242–250.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D.S., 2017. Masters of the universe: hayek, Friedman, and the birth of neoliberal politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R., 2002. “Common-sense” neoliberalism: progressive conservative urbanism in Toronto Canada. Antipode, 34, 578–601. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, R. and Young, D., 2008. Transportation: the bottleneck of regional competitiveness in Toronto. Environment and Planning C, 26, 728–751. doi:10.1068/c68m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D.F., 1993. Sharing power: public governance and private markets. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R., 1985. Arguments for and against planning. Town Planning Review, 56, 5–20. doi:10.3828/tpr.56.1.e8286q3082111km4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A., 2018. The unaffordable city: housing and transit in North American cities. Cities, 83 (31), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffont, -J.-J., 1989. Externalities. In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, eds.. Allocation, information and markets. London: Palgrave, 112–116.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, U., Keil, R., and Kipfer, S., 2010. Reurbanization in Toronto: condominium boom and social housing revitalization. The Planning Review, 46 (180), 81–90. doi:10.1080/02513625.2010.10557065
   Google Scholar
• Lemon, J., 1985. Toronto since 1918: an illustrated history. Toronto: James Lorimer.
   Google Scholar
• Lilla, M., 2017. The once and future liberal: after identity politics. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Melia, S., Parkhurst, G., and Barton, H., 2011. The paradox of intensification. Transport Policy, 18, 46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron, J., 1988. Housing in postwar Canada: demographic change, household formation, and housing demand. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, M., 2016. From gentrification to youthification? The increasing importance of young age in delineating high-density living. Urban Studies, 53, 2903–2920. doi:10.1177/0042098015603292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario (Government of, Minister of Municipal Affairs), 2017 [2006]. Growth plan for the greater golden horseshoe. Toronto: Government of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Ostler, T., 2014. Downtown Toronto: trends, issues, intensification. Toronto: City of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., 2010. Constructions of neoliberal reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K., 1944. The great transformation: origins of our time. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Porteous, J.D., 1989. Planned to death: the annihilation of a place called Howdendyke. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Rose, A. and Storper, M., 2019. Housing, urban growth and inequalities: the limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality. Urban Studies. doi:10.1177/0042098019859458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolnik, R., 2019. Urban warfare: housing under the empire of finance. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, A., 1972. Government metropolitan Toronto: A social and political analysis, 1953–1971. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, G., 2017. Toronto’s condo-builders: development approaches and spatial preferences. Urban geography, 38, 606–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., 2007. Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6, 52–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T., 2011. Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010. Progress in planning, 76, 177–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S., 2001. The global city: new York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayegh, K.S., 1987. Housing: A Canadian perspective. Ottawa: Academy Book.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, J., 1993. The shape of the city: toronto struggles with modern planning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, J., 2009. The shape of the suburbs: understanding Toronto’s sprawl. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, J., 2015. How we changed Toronto: the inside story of twelve creative, tumulus years in civic life, 1969–1980. Toronto: James Lorimer.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, M., 2005. Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131, 246–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada, 1973. Toronto: population and housing characteristics by census tracts, 95–721. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada, 2006a. 2006 census, profile of census tracts: age and sex. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada, 2006b. 2006 census, profile of census tracts: immigration and place of birth. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada, 2016. Census profile, 2016: Toronto CMA. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Storeys, T., 2019a. 40 per cent of Toronto condos are investor-owned, driving up prices. Toronto Storeys, 8 July. https://torontostoreys.com/2019/07/toronto-condos-investor-owned/
   Google Scholar
• Storeys, T., 2019b. Toronto has the most cranes in North America by a long shot. Toronto Storeys, 29 July. https://torontostoreys.com/2019/07/Toronto-cranes-july-2019/
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J.M., 1977. Great cities and their traffic. London: Gollancz.
   Google Scholar
• Thornley, A., 1991. Urban planning under thatcherism: the challenge of the market. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuna, T.-K. and Baeten, G., Eds, 2012. Contradictions of neoliberal planning: cities, policies, and politics. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, R.A., 2001. The social ecology of the post-Fordist/globalized city? Economic restructuring and socio-spatial polarization in the Toronto urban region. Urban Studies, 38, 407–447. doi:10.1080/00420980120027438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C.J., 1998. Public choice, Pigouvian and Coasian planning theory. Urban Studies, 35, 53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., 2016. Planning Toronto: the planners. The plans. Their legacies, 1940–80. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar