Random noise suppression of seismic data by time–frequency peak filtering with variational mode decomposition

References

• Amezquita-Sanchez, J., and H. Adeli. 2015. A new music-empirical wavelet transform methodology for time-frequency analysis of noisy nonlinear and non-stationary signals. Digital Signal Processing 45: 55–68. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2015.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, M., M. Roessgen, and B. Boashash. 1994. Filtering real signals through frequency modulation and peak detection in the time-frequency plane. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 3: 345–8.
   Google Scholar
• Barkat, B., B. Boashash, and L.J. Stankovic. 1999. Adaptive window in the PWVD for the IF estimation of FM signals in additive Gaussian noise. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 3: 1317–20.
   Google Scholar
• Boashash, B. 1992a. Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. I. fundamentals. Proceedings of the IEEE 80: 520–38. doi: 10.1109/5.135376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boashash, B. 1992b. Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. II. algorithms and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 80: 540–68. doi: 10.1109/5.135378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boashash, B., and M. Mesbah. 2004. Signal enhancement by time-frequency peak filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 52: 929–37. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2004.823510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canales, L. 1984. Random noise reduction. Seg Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 3: 329.
   Google Scholar
• Candes, E., L. Demanet, D. Donoho, and L. Ying. 2006. Fast discrete curvelet transforms. Multiscale Modeling and Simulation 5: 861–99. doi: 10.1137/05064182X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, S., and X. Chen. 2005. The second generation wavelet transform and its application in denoising of seismic data. Applied Geophysics 2: 70–4. doi: 10.1007/s11770-005-0034-4
   Google Scholar
• Colominas, M.A., G. Schlotthauer, and M.E. Torres. 2014. Improved complete ensemble emd: A suitable tool for biomedical signal processing. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 14: 19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho, D.L., and J.M. Johnstone. 1994. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81: 425–55. doi: 10.1093/biomet/81.3.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragomiretskiy, K., and D. Zosso. 2014. Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 62: 531–44. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, S.L.M., and T.J. Ulrych. 1988. Application of singular value decomposition to vertical seismic profiling. Geophysics 53: 778–85. doi: 10.1190/1.1442513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, S., Y. Chen, S. Zu, S. Qu, and W. Zhong. 2015. Structure-oriented singular value decomposition for random noise attenuation of seismic data. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 12, no. 11: 262–72. doi: 10.1088/1742-2132/12/2/262
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., F. Ringdal, and T. Kvaerna. 2008. Detection and characterization of seismic phases using continuous spectral estimation on incoherent and partially coherent arrays. Geophysical Journal International 172: 405–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilles, J. 2013. Empirical wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 61: 3999–4010. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2265222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, N.E., Z. Shen, S.R. Long, M.C. Wu, H.H. Shih, Q. Zheng, and H.H. Liu. 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 454: 903–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, L., Y. Li, and B. Yang. 2005. Reduction of random noise for seismic data by time-frequency peak filtering. Progress in Geophysics 20: 724–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, M.A., and C. Shahnaz. 2012. Denoising of ecg signals based on noise reduction algorithms in emd and wavelet domains. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 7: 481–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2011.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., L. Zhan, and L. Shen. 2015. Friction signal denoising using complete ensemble EMD with adaptive noise and mutual information. Entropy 17: 5965–79. doi: 10.3390/e17095965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., B. Zhang, S. Verma, and K.J. Marfurt. 2018. Seismic signal denoising using thresholded variational mode decomposition. Exploration Geophysics 49: 450–61. doi: 10.1071/EG17004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Y. Li, H. Ma, and L. Xu. 2016. Simultaneous seismic random noise attenuation and signal preservation by optimal spatiotemporal TFPF. Journal of Applied Geophysics 128: 123–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Y. Li, and B. Yang. 2007. Recovery of seismic events by time-frequency peak filtering. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 5: 441–4.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Y. Li, B. Yang, H. Ma, and C. Zhang. 2014. Seismic random noise elimination by adaptive time-frequency peak filtering. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 11: 337–41. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2257674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., S. Cao, and Z. Wang. 2017. Application of variational mode decomposition to seismic random noise reduction. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 14: 888–99. doi: 10.1088/1742-2140/aa6b28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., B. Dang, Y. Li, and H. Lin. 2012. Local spatiotemporal time-frequency peak filtering method for seismic random noise reduction. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 10: 756–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Y. Li, H. Lin, and H. Ma. 2014. An amplitude-preserved time-frequency peak filtering based on empirical mode decomposition for seismic random noise reduction. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 11: 896–900. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2281202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., G. Yang, M. Li, and H. Yin. 2016. Variational mode decomposition denoising combined the detrended fluctuation analysis. Signal Processing 125: 349–64. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, W., W. Zhang, and D. Liu. 2006. Local linear coherent noise attenuation based on local polynomial approximation. Geophysics 71: 105–10. doi: 10.1190/1.2236003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, H., J. Ma, and H. Yang. 2009. Comparisons of wavelets, contourlets and curvelets in seismic denoising. Journal of Applied Geophysics 69: 103–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankovic, L., and V. Katkovnik. 1999. The Wigner distribution of noisy signals with adaptive time-frequency varying window. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 47: 1099–108. doi: 10.1109/78.752607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., and Y. Li. 2014. Parabolic-trace time-frequency peak filtering for seismic random noise attenuation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 11: 158–62. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2250906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., and N.E. Huang. 2009. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis 1: 1–41. doi: 10.1142/S1793536909000047
   Google Scholar
• Zahir, M., and B. Hussain. 2000. Adaptive instantaneous frequency estimation of multicomponent FM signal using quadratic time-frequency distributions. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 50: 657–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar