The effect of wave amplitude on S-wave velocity in porous media: an experimental study by Laser Doppler Interferometry

References

• Abeele, K.E.-A.V.D., P.A. Johnson, R.A. Guyer, and K.R. McCall. 1997. On the quasi-analytic treatment of hysteretic nonlinear response in elastic wave propagation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101: 1885–98. doi: 10.1121/1.418198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ba, J., L. Zhang, D. Wang, Z.Y. Yuan, W. Cheng, R.P. Ma, and C.F. Wu. 2018. Experimental analysis on P-wave attenuation in carbonate rocks and reservoir identification. Journal of Seismic Exploration 27: 371–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayon, A., P.N.J. Rasolofosaon. 1996. Three-component recording of ultrasonic transient vibration by optical heterodyne interferometry. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99: 954–61. doi: 10.1121/1.414623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, N.G.W., and K. Hodgson. 1965. Some detailed stress-strain curves for rock. Journal of Geophysical Research 70: 2883–8. doi: 10.1029/JZ070i012p02883.
   Google Scholar
• Dainty, J.C. 1975 Laser speckle and related phenomena, Vol. 9, Topics in Applied Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/BFb0111434.
   Google Scholar
• Ennos, A.E. 1978. IV speckle interferometry. Progress in Optics 16: 233–88. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6638(08)70073-8.
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima, Y., O. Nishizawa, H. Sato, and M. Ohtake. 2003. Laboratory study on scattering characteristics of shear waves in rock samples. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93: 253–63. doi: 10.1785/0120020074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacouot, P., and J.-M. Fournier. 2000. Interferometry in speckl light - theory and applications. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P.A., B. Zinszner, and P.N.J. Rasolofosoan. 1996. Resonance and elastic nonlinear phenomena in rock. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 101: 11553–64. doi: 10.1029/96JB00647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, D.H., and M.N. Toksov. 1980. Thermal cracking and amplitude dependent attenuation. Journal of Geophysical Research 85: 937–42. doi: 10.1029/JB085iB02p00937.
   Google Scholar
• Lebedev, M., A. Bóna, R. Pevzner, and B. Gurevich. 2011. Elastic anisotropy estimation from laboratory measurements of velocity and polarization of quasi-P-waves using laser interferometry. Geophysics 76: WA83–WA89. doi: 10.1190/1.3569110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R.J., and R.W. Haupt. 1994. Static and dynamic elastic moduli in granite: the effect of strain amplitude, in Rock mechanics: models and measurements challenges from industry. In Rock Mech. Nelson Laubach, 473–80.
   Google Scholar
• Mashinskii, E.I. 1999. Amplitude-dependent attenuation of acoustic signals in rocks. RAN. Ser. Fiz. Zemli 11: 63–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mashinskii, E.I. 2001. Nonlinearity of a quasi-static stress-strain relation: the dependence on the level of mechanical energy. Geofizika 2: 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mashinskii, E.I. 2004. Variants of the strain-amplitude dependence of elastic wave velocities in rocks under pressure. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 1: 295–306. doi: 10.1088/1742-2132/1/4/008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashinskii, E.I. 2008. Amplitude-frequency dependencies of wave attenuation in single-crystal quartz: experimental study. Journal of Geophysical Research 113: 1–11. doi: 10.1029/2008JB005719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashinsky, E.I. 1994. Quasi-micro-plasticity processes and nonlinear seismicity. Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth 30: 97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mashinsky, E.I. 2003. Differences between static and dynamic elastic moduli of rocks: physical causes. Russian Geology and Geophysics 44: 953–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mavko, G.M. 1979. Frictional attenuation: an inherent amplitude dependence. Journal of Geophysical Research 84: 4769–75. doi: 10.1029/JB084iB09p04769.
   Google Scholar
• Mavko, G., T. Mukerji, and J. Dvorkin. 2009. The rock physics handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511626753.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, K.R., and R.A. Guyer. 1994. Equation of state and wave propagation in hysteretic nonlinear elastic materials. Geophysical Research Letters 12: 23,887–23,897. doi: 10.1029/94JB01941
   Google Scholar
• Monchalin, J.P. 1986. Optical detection of ultrasound. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 33: 485–99. doi: 10.1109/T-UFFC.1986.26860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monchalin, J.P., J.D. Aussel, R. Héon, C.K. Jen, A. Boudreault, and R. Bernier. 1989. Measurement of in-plane and out-of-plane ultrasonic displacements by optical heterodyne interferometry. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 8: 121–33. doi: 10.1007/BF00565636.
   Google Scholar
• Nishizawa, O., T. Satoh, X. Lei, and Y. Kuwahara. 1997. Laboratory studies of seismic wave propagation in inhomogeneous media using a laser Doppler vibrometer. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 87: 809–23. http://www.bssaonline.org/content/87/4/809.short.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourifard, N., and M. Lebedev. 2018. Research note: the effect of strain amplitude produced by ultrasonic waves on its velocity. Geophysical Prospecting 67: 715–22. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouet, B., and P.N.J. Rasolofosaon. 1990. Seismic physical modeling using laser ultrasonics. In 60th Ann. Internat. Mtg, 841–4. doi: 10.1190/1.1890357.
   Google Scholar
• Scruby, C.B., and L.E. Drain. 1990. Laser ultrasonics: techniques and applications. New York: Taylor and Francis Group. https://www.crcpress.com/Laser-Ultrasonics-Techniques-and-Applications/Scruby-Drain/p/book/9780750300506.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R.S., M.N. Toksoz, and A. Timur. 1983. Strain dependent attenuation: observations and a proposed mechanism. Journal of Geophysical Research 88: 546–54. doi: 10.1029/JB088iB01p00546.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Cate, J.A., and T.J. Shankland. 1996. Slow dynamics in the nonlinear elastic response of Berea sandstone. Geophysical Research Letters 23: 3019–22. doi: 10.1029/96GL02884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutuncu, Azra N., A.L. Podio, A.R. Gregory, M.M. Sharma. 1998. Nonlinear viscoelastic behaviour of sedimentary rocks. Part II: hysteresis effect and influence of type of fluid on elastic moduli Geophysics. Geophysics 63.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, K., and A. Nur. 1979. Pore fluids and seismic attenuation in rocks. Geophysical Research Letters 6: 1–4. doi: 10.1029/GL006i001p00001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, K.W., and A. Nur. 1982. Seismic attenuation: effects of pore fluids and frictional sliding. Geophysics 47: 1–15. http://link.aip.org/link/?GPY/47/1/1. doi: 10.1190/1.1441276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinszner, B., P.A. Johnson, and P.N.J. Rasolofosaon. 1997. Influence of change in physical state on elastic nonlinear response in rock: significance of effective pressure and water saturation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 102: 8105–20. doi: 10.1029/96JB03225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar