Seismic random noise attenuation via a two-stage U-net with supervised attention

References

• Anvari, R., A.R. Kahoo, M.S. Monfared, M. Mohammadi, R.M.D. Omer, and A.H. Mohammed. 2021. Random noise attenuation in seismic data using Hankel sparse low-rank approximation. Computers & Geosciences 153: 104802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. 2015. Deblending using a space-varying median filter. Exploration Geophysics 46, no. 4: 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., X. Lu, J. Zhang, X. Chu, and C. Chen. 2021. HINet: Half instance normalization network for image restoration. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 182–192.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, M., L. Fu, and W. Fang. 2022. Seismic noise attenuation via convolution neural network with learningnoise prior. Exploration Geophysics 53, no. 1: 38–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G., and G. Beresford. 1995. Median filter behaviour with seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting 43, no. 3: 329–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J.N., and R.A. Wiggins. 1968. Characteristics of optimum multichannel stacking filters. Geophysics 33, no. 1: 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, J.L., and D.R. Velis. 2016. A simple method inspired by empirical mode decomposition for denoising seismic data. Geophysics 81, no. 6: V403–V413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L.Y., C. Liu, Y. Liu, Z.-S. Zheng, and Q.-H. Wang. 2020. Seismic random noise attenuation based on streaming prediction filter in the f-x domain. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese) 63, no. 1: 329–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., and M. van der Baan. 2015. Microseismic and seismic denoising via ensemble empirical mode decomposition and adaptive thresholding. Geophysics 80, no. 6: KS69–KS80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, S., J. Ma, and H. Yang. 2009. Comparisons of wavelets, contourlets and curvelets in seismic denoising. Journal of Applied Geophysics 69, no. 2: 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennenfent, G., L. Fenelon, and F.J. Herrmann. 2010. Nonequispaced curvelet transform for seismic data reconstruction: A sparsity-promoting approach. Geophysics 75, no. 6: WB203–WB210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, N., H. Ma, X. Dong, and Y. Li. 2020. Background noise suppression using trainable nonlinear reaction diffusion assisted by robust principal component analysis. Exploration Geophysics 51, no. 6: 642–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., S. Liu, X. Dai, G. Hu, X. Huang, Y. Yao, G. Xie, and L. Shao. 2022. Deep metric learning based on meta-mining strategy with semiglobal information. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3202571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Y. Li, Y. Li, and Z. Qian. 2018. Downhole microseismic signal denoising via empirical wavelet transform and adaptive thresholding. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 15, no. 6: 2469–2480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., X. Chen, J. Li, and Y. Chen. 2021. Nonlocal weighted robust principal component analysis for seismic noise attenuation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 59, no. 2: 1745–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., G. Lin, F. Shen, X. Huang, Y. Yao, and H. Shen. 2023. Robust-EQA: Robust learning for embodied question answering with noisy labels. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3251984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J. 2018. Deep learning for attenuation random and coherence noise simultaneously. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, no.2: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J.T., J.H. Wang, and G.C. Liu. 2016. Seismic data noise attenuation and interpolation using singular value decomposition in frequency domain. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum 55, no. 2: 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Mafakheri, J., A.R. Kahoo, R. Anvari, M. Mohammadi, M. Radad, and M.S. Monfared. 2022. Expand dimensional of seismic data and random noise attenuation using low-rank estimation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 15: 2773–2781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, E.A., and S. Treitel. 1967. Principles of digital Wiener filtering. Geophysical Prospecting 15, no. 3: 311–332.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, O.M., and Y. Chen. 2020. Deep denoising autoencoder for seismic random noise attenuation. Geophysics 85, no. 4: V367–V376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H.Y., and Q.C. Li. 2010. SVD (singular value decomposition) seismic wave field noise elimination in frequency domain. Oil Geophysical Prospecting 45, no. 2: 185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., X. Huang, Y. Li, and K. Jensen. 2023. Removing multiple types of noise of distributed acoustic sensing seismic data using attention-guided denoising convolutional neural network. Frontiers in Earth Science. doi:10.3389/feart.2022.986470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.J., Q. Li, X.H. Xu, and L. Cao. 2018. Random noise attenuation method of seismic signal based on the fractional order wavelet domain GSM model. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese) 61, no. 7: 2989–2997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.Q., W.K. Lu, J.L. Liu, M. Zhang, and Y.-K. Miao. 2019. Random seismic noise attenuation based on data augmentation and CNN. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese) 62, no. 1: 421–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., J. Ma, and W. Wang. 2019. Deep learning for denoising. Geophysics 84, no. 6: V333–V350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamir, S.W., A. Arora, S. Khan S, M. Hayat, F.S. Khan, M.-H. Yang, and L. Shao. 2021. Multi-stage progressive image restoration. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 14821–14831.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, M.Y. 2014. Seismic data denoising based on the fractional Fourier transformation. Journal of Applied Geophysics 109: 62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., W. Zuo, Y. Chen, D. Meng, and L. Zhang. 2017. Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26, no. 7: 3142–3155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., W. Zuo, and L. Zhang. 2018. FFDnet: Toward a fast and flexible solution for CNN-based image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27, no. 9: 4608–4622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Y. Li, X. Dong, and B. Yang. 2019. Low-frequency noise suppression method based on improved DnCNN in desert seismic data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 16, no. 5: 811–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Y. Li, and N. Wu. 2022. Coupled noise reduction in distributed acoustic sensing seismic data based on convolutional neural network. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 19: 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar