Inter-week variation of meibometry and tear break-up time in healthy subjects

References

• Chew CK, Hykin PG, Jansweijer C, et al. The casual level of meibomian lipids in humans. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12:255–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoi N, Mossa F, Tiffany JM, et al. Assessment of meibomian gland function in dry eye using meibometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:723–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2006–2049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho P, Brown B. Review of the tear break-up time and a closer look at the tear break-up time of Hong Kong Chinese. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70:30–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley CG, Himebaugh N, Renner D, et al. Tear breakup dynamics: a technique for quantifying tear film instability. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Begley CG, Chalmers R, et al. Temporal progression and spatial repeatability of tear breakup. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:723–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena-Verdeal H, Garcia-Resua C, Ramos L, et al. Diurnal variations in tear film break-up time determined in healthy subjects by software-assisted interpretation of tear film video recordings. Clin Exp Optom. 2016;99:142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz P, Tichy A, Nell B. Review of the measuring precision of the new meibometer MB550 through repeated measurements in dogs. Vet Ophthalmol. 2008;11:368–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Resua C, Pena-Verdeal H, Giraldez MJ, et al. Clinical relationship of meibometry with ocular symptoms and tear film stability. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40:408–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew CK, Jansweijer C, Tiffany JM, et al. An instrument for quantifying meibomian lipid on the lid margin: the meibometer. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12:247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebbag L, Kass PH, Maggs DJ. Reference values, intertest correlations, and test-retest repeatability of selected tear film tests in healthy cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015;246:426–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofri R, Orgad K, Kass PH, et al. Canine meibometry: establishing baseline values for meibomian gland secretions in dogs. Vet J. 2007;174:536–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama N, Kawashima M, Kaido M, et al. Analysis of meibum before and after intraductal meibomian gland probing in eyes with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2015;34:1206–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:276–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1930–1937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:539–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Du C, Zhu D, et al. Daytime variations of tear osmolarity and tear meniscus volume. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38:282–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemp MA, Bron AJ, Baudouin C, et al. Tear osmolarity in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:792–798 e791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan B. Challenges in using signs and symptoms to evaluate new biomarkers of dry eye disease. Ocul Surf. 2014;12:2–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puinhas A, Sampaio P, Castanheira EM, et al. Comparison of IgA, TNF-alpha and surface tension of the tear film in two different times of the day. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36:140–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SC, Sanabria O, et al. Evaluation of subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear-film disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea. 1998;17:38–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto Y, Sato EA, Ibrahim OM, et al. The application of in vivo laser confocal microscopy to the diagnosis and evaluation of meibomian gland dysfunction. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1263–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagymihalyi A, Dikstein S, Tiffany JM. The influence of eyelid temperature on the delivery of meibomian oil. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:367–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller KL, Walt JG, Mink DR, et al. Minimal clinically important difference for the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:94–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl U, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Osmolality and tear film dynamics. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22:640–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Resua C, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Lira M, et al. Clinical assessment of the lower tear meniscus height. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29:487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray WA, O’Day DM. Statistical analysis of multi-eye data in ophthalmic research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:1186–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Bevan R, Farrell JC. Diurnal variation in precorneal tear film stability. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65:151–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lira M, Oliveira ME, Franco S. Comparison of the tear film clinical parameters at two different times of the day. Clin Exp Optom. 2011;94:557–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitton E, Keech A, Jones L, et al. Subjective and objective variation of the tear film pre- and post-sleep. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:740–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson ME, Murphy PJ. The effect of instilled fluorescein solution volume on the values and repeatability of TBUT measurements. Cornea. 2005;24:811–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Nelson JD, Azar DT, et al. TFOS DEWS II report executive summary. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:802–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox SM, Nichols KK, Nichols JJ. Agreement between automated and traditional measures of tear film breakup. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92:e257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez J, Rodriguez-Vallejo M, Martinez J, et al. Agreement and repeatability of objective systems for assessment of the tear film. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256:1535–1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker PM, Lane KJ, Ousler GW 3rd, et al. Diurnal variation of visual function and the signs and symptoms of dry eye. Cornea. 2010;29:607–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MTM, Tien L, Han A, et al. Impact of blinking on ocular surface and tear film parameters. Ocul Surf. 2018;16:424–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inomata T, Iwagami M, Hiratsuka Y, et al. Maximum blink interval is associated with tear film breakup time: a new simple, screening test for dry eye disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto T, Zheng X, Klyce SD, et al. A new method for tear film stability analysis using videokeratography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:607–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar