Ocular surface microvascular response and its relation to contact lens fitting and ocular comfort: an update of recent research

References

• Efron N, Jones L, Bron AJ, et al. The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: report of the contact lens interactions with the ocular surface and adnexa subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS98–TFOS122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim CHL, Stapleton F, Mehta JS. Review of contact lens-related complications. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 2):S1–S10.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Jagpal R. Validation of computer morphs for grading contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:341–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MD. Is there a role for inflammation in contact lens discomfort? Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43:5–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Willcox MD, Bron AJ, et al. The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS7–TFOS13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Drew T, Dhallu S, et al. Impact of soft contact lens edge design and midperipheral lens shape on the epithelium and its indentation with lens mobility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:6190–6197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markoulli M, Papas E, Cole N, et al. Corneal erosions in contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart JK, Stapleton F, Minassian D. Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet. 1991;338:650–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Tan J. Impact of contact lens material, design, and fitting on discomfort. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43:32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Brennan NA, Gonzalez-Meijome J, et al. The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: report of the contact lens materials, design, and care subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS37–TFOS70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N. Contact lens wear is intrinsically inflammatory. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Brennan NA, Morgan PB, et al. Lid wiper epitheliopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;53:140–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorbara L, Maram J, Simpson T, et al. Corneal, conjunctival effects and blood flow changes related to silicone hydrogel lens wear and their correlations with end of day comfort. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41:193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn J, Hall L, Young G. Clinical comparison of optimum and large diameter soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41:405–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn J, Hall L, Mroczkowska S, et al. The influence of end of day silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lens fit on ocular comfort, physiology and lens wettability. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38:339–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boychev N, Laughton DS, Bharwani G, et al. How should initial fit inform soft contact lens prescribing. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39:227–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong TN, Graham AD, Lin MC. Factors in contact lens symptoms: evidence from a multistudy database. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilia D, Lazon DLJ, Peng N, et al. Effect of lens and solution choice on the comfort of contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Chamberlain P, Moody K, et al. Ocular physiology and comfort in neophyte subjects fitted with daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36:118–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedtke C, Bakaraju RC, Ehrmann K, et al. Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39:38–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara NA, Polse KA, Brand RJ, et al. Tear mixing under a soft contact lens: effects of lens diameter. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:659–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Dumbleton KA, Theodoratos P, et al. Association between contact lens discomfort and pre-lens tear film kinetics. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:881–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Yeh TN, Leung T, et al. The relationship of lid wiper epitheliopathy to ocular surface signs and symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:1878–1887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghamdi WM, Markoulli M, Papas EB. The effect of contact lens wear on the cellular morphology of the lid wiper area. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95:491–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pult H, Riede-Pult BH. Impact of soft contact lenses on lid- parallel conjunctival folds. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019;42:415–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Herman JP, Finnemore VM, et al. An evaluation of the efficacy of fluorescein, rose bengal, lissamine green, and a new dye mixture for ocular surface staining. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:61–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Greiner JV, Herman JP, et al. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearers. Clao J. 2002;28:211–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C. Corneal staining: do we really understand what we are seeing? Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Herman JP, Greiner JV, et al. Lid wiper epitheliopathy and dry eye symptoms. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31:2–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maissa C, Guillon M, Garofalo RJ. Contact lens-induced circumlimbal staining in silicone hydrogel contact lenses worn on a daily wear basis. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38:16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brautaset RL, Nilsson M, Leach N, et al. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:312–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson RC, Wolffsohn JS, Nick J, et al. Clinical performance of daily disposable soft contact lenses using sustained release technology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29:127–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheung AT, Hu BS, Wong SA, et al. Microvascular abnormalities in the bulbar conjunctiva of contact lens users. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2012;51:77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Zhong J, DeBuc DC, et al. Functional slit lamp biomicroscopy for imaging bulbar conjunctival microvasculature in contact lens wearers. Microvasc Res. 2014;92:62–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Jiang H, Wang J. Conjunctival vascular adaptation related to ocular comfort in habitual contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;216:99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Xu Z, Jiang H, et al. Altered bulbar conjunctival microcirculation in response to contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43:95–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Hu L, Shi C, et al. Inter-visit measurement variability of conjunctival vasculature and circulation in habitual contact lens wearers and non-lens wearers. Eye Vis (Lond). 2019;6:10.
   Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Hu L, Chen W, et al. Evaluated conjunctival blood flow velocity in daily contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 1):S238–S243.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Shi C, Jiang H, et al. Factors affecting microvascular responses in the bulbar conjunctiva in habitual contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:4108–4114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Z, Wang J, Jiang H, et al. Lid wiper microvascular responses as an indicator of contact lens discomfort. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;170:197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Jiang H, Tao A, et al. Measurement variability of the bulbar conjunctival microvasculature in healthy subjects using functional slit lamp biomicroscopy (FSLB). Microvasc Res. 2015;101:15–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knop E, Korb DR, Blackie CA, et al. The lid margin is an underestimated structure for preservation of ocular surface health and development of dry eye disease. Dev Ophthalmol. 2010;45:108–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guthrie SE, Jones L, Blackie CA, et al. A comparative study between an oil-in-water emulsion and nonlipid eye drops used for rewetting contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41:373–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl U, Jalbert I. Exploring the links between contact lens comfort, osmolarity and lid wiper staining. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41:110–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Lievens CW, Bloomenstein MR, et al. Dual-polymer drops, contact lens comfort, and lid wiper epitheliopathy. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:979–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeniad B, Beginoglu M, Bilgin LK. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy in contact lens users and patients with dry eye. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36:140–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze MM, Srinivasan S, Hickson-Curran SB, et al. Lid wiper epitheliopathy in soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:943–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiraishi A, Yamaguchi M, Ohashi Y. Prevalence of upper- and lower-lid-wiper epitheliopathy in contact lens wearers and non-wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40:220–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moezzi AM, Varikooty J, Luensmann D, et al. The short-term physiological impact of switching reusable silicone hydrogel wearers into a hydrogel daily disposable multifocal. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1193–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Rohr M, Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, et al. Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort, tear stability and ocular physiology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41:117–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best N, Drury L, Wolffsohn JS. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36:232–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui L, Shen M, Wang MR, et al. Micrometer-scale contact lens movements imaged by ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:275–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar