Knowledge translation for the everyday optometrist

References

• Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44:166–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crombie IK, Davies HTO. Beyond health outcomes: the advantages of measuring process. J Eval Clin Pract. 1998;4:31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin HR, Pronovost P, Diette GB. The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001;13:469–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt TD, Ramanathan SA, Hannaford NA, et al. CareTrack Australia: assessing the appropriateness of adult healthcare: protocol for a retrospective medical record review. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–2645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, et al. Assessing the appropriateness of healthcare delivery in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;197:100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299:211–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L, et al. iCareTrack: measuring the appropriateness of eyecare delivery in Australia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley J, Huisignh CE, Swain TA, et al. Compliance with primary open-angle glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma suspect preferred practice patterns in a retail-based eye clinic. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:1068–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann L, Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J Assoc Inform Sci Tech. 2015;66:2215–2222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramin S, Pakravan M, Habibi G, et al. Scientometric analysis and mapping of 20 years of glaucoma research. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9:1329–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnahedh T, Suttle CM, Alabdelmoneam M, et al. Optometrists show rudimentary understanding of evidence-based practice but are ready to embrace it: can barriers be overcome? Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98:263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard T, Synnot A, Elliott J, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation. Syst Rev. 2019;8:325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to Implementation Science. Implementation Sci. 2006;1:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield JM, Spring B, Brownson RC et al. Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice. Milbank Q. 2009;87:368–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 1992;268:2420–2425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiely PM, Slater J. Optometry Australia entry-level competency standards for optometry 2014. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98:65–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jernberg T, Johanson P, Held C, et al. Association between adoption of evidence-based treatment and survival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2011;305:1677–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emparanza JI, Cabello JB, Burls AJE. Does evidence-based practice improve patient outcomes? An analysis of a natural experiment in a Spanish hospital. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:1059–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. 3rd ed ed. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brown CE, Wickline MA, Ecoff L, et al. Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice at an academic medical centre. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:371–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagoto S L., Spring B., Coups E J., et al. Barriers and facilitators of evidence-based practice perceived by behavioural science health professionals. J Clin Psychol. 2007;63:695–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiwe S, Kajermo KN, Lenne R, et al. Evidence-based practice: attitudes, knowledge and behaviour among allied health care professionals. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:198–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, et al. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation - A scoping review. Healthcare. 2016;4:36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun J, Kovner CT, Witkoski Stimpfel A. Barriers and facilitators of nurses’ use of clinical practice guidelines: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;60:54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Besters CF, et al. Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: a survey among general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous KF, Kalloniatis M, Hayen A, et al. Application of clinical techniques relevant for glaucoma assessment by optometrists: concordance with guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34:580–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines for the screening, prognosis, diagnosis, management and prevention of glaucoma. Canberra, ACT: NHMRC; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:1045–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E472–E478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelov E, Armstron JJ, Nguyen M, et al. Assessing the methodological quality of glaucoma clinical practice guidelines and their recommendations on microinvasive glaucoma surgery: a systematic review. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:e44–e49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patterns Panel. Preferred practice patterns: primary open-angle glaucoma. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier inc; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Opthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Glaucoma Panel. Preferred practice pattern: primary angle closure. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Glaucoma: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline 81. United Kingdom: NICE; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Ophthalmological Society Glaucoma Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian ophthalmological society evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of glaucoma in the adult eye. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009;44:S7–S54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optometry Board of Australia [Internet]. Registration standard: continuing professional development. Melbourne, VIC: AHPRA; c2020 [cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.optometryboard.gov.au/Registration-Standards/CPD.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Downie LE, Keller PR, Vingrys AJ. An evidence-based analysis of Australian optometrists’ dry eye practices. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:1385–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie LE, Rumney N, Gad A, et al. Comparing self-reported optometric dry eye clinical practices in Australia and the United Kingdom: is there scope for practice improvement? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36:140–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass A, Keller PR, He M, et al. Knowledge, perspectives and clinical practices of Australian optometrists in relation to childhood myopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103:155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Anderson AJ, Downie LE. Insights into Australian optometrists’ knowledge and attitude towards prescribing blue light-blocking ophthalmic devices. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:194–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie LE, Keller PR. The self-reported clinical practice behaviors of Australian optometrists as related to smoking, diet and nutritional supplementation. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price DW, Wagner DP, Krane NK, et al. What are the implications of implementation science for medical education? Med Educ Online. 2015;20:27003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, et al. A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel? Implementation Sci. 2010;5:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetroe J, Graham ID, Foy R, et al. Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 2008;86:125–155.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Bridging the “know-do” gap: meeting on knowledge translation in global health [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services; 2006 [cited 2020 Jun 4]. Available from: file:///F:/Journal%20Articles/Implementation_KT/Knowledge%20Translation/WHO_bridging-the-know-do-gap.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Cochrane Collaboration [Internet]. Cochrane knowledge translation framework. Cochrane community: the cochrane collaboration; c2017 [cited 2020 Jun 9]. Available from: https://community.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/Cochrane%20Knowledge%20Translation%20Framework%281%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute of Health Research [Internet]. Ottawa ON: CIHR; c2018 [cited 2019 Nov 21]. Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29529.html.
   Google Scholar
• Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Yoon PW, et al. The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? Genet Med. 2007;9:665–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research - “Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007;297:403–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare W, WoldeMussie E, Lai R, et al. Efficacy and safety of memantine, an NMDA-type open-channel blocker, for reduction of retinal injury associated with experimental glaucoma in rat and monkey. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;45(Suppl 3):S284–289. discussion S295-286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yücel YH, Gupta N, Zhang Q, et al. Memantine protects neurons from shrinkage in the lateral geniculate nucleus in experimental glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:217–225.
   Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA, et al. Oral memantine for the treatment of glaucoma: design and results of 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1874–1885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyhan AA. Lost in translation: the valley of death across preclinical and clinical divide – identification of problems and overcoming obstacles. Transl Med Commun. 2019;4:18.
   Google Scholar
• Guymer C, Wood JP, Chidlow G, et al. Neuroprotection in glaucoma: recent advances and clinical translation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;47:88–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khouri AS, Serle JB, Bacharach J, et al. Once-daily Netarsudil versus twice-daily timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: the randomized phase 3 ROCKET-4 study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;204:97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asrani S, Robin AL, Serle JB, et al. Netasudil/Latanoprost fixed-dose combination for elevated intraocular pressure: three-month data from a randomised phase 3 trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:248–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Ong T, Sforzolini BS, et al. A randomised, controlled comparison of latanoprostene bunod and latanoprost 0.005% in the treatment of ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma: the VOYAGER study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:738–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Martin KR, Peace J, et al. Comparison of Latanoprostene Bunod 0.024% and Timolol Maleate 0.5% in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the LUNAR study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Sforzolini BS, Vittitow JL, et al. Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% versus timlol maleate 0.5% in subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the APOLLO study. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:965–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers MC, Florez ID, McNair SA, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: tools to support high quality patient care. Semin Nucl Med. 2019;49:145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akl EA, Meerpohl JJ, Elliott J, et al. Living systematic reviews: 4. Living guideline recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;91:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige E, Agostino J, Phillips C, et al. Living guidelines for absolute cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28:829–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel JP, Dowswell T, Lewin S, et al. Developing and applying a ‘living guidelines’ approach to WHO recommendations on maternal and perinatal health. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC. Measuring the appropriateness of eye care delivery in Australia [dissertation]. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Feng R, Luk SMH, Wu CHK, et al. Perceptions of training in gonioscopy. Eye. 2019;33:1798–1802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensing M. Implementation science in healthcare: introduction and perspective. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundh wesen. 2015;109:97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz A. Implementation practice [Internet]. North Carolina: National Implementation Research Network. 2019 May – [cited 2021 Jan 16]. Available from: https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/practicing-implementation
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Sci. 2015;10:53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field B, Booth A, Ilott I, et al. Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: a citation analysis and systematic review. Implementation Sci. 2014;9:172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitson A, Straus SE. The knowledge-to-action cycle: identifying the gaps. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E73–E77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci. 2011;6:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies G, et al. Tailored intervention to address determinants of practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. cited 2020 Feb 12. Available from https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub3/epdf/full
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas J. Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;703:226–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon SA, Ghosh G. Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice? Eye (Lond). 2001;15:458–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giguere A, Legare F, Grimshaw J, et al. Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:Art. No.: CD004398.
   Google Scholar
• Langeggen I, Ellertsen G, Ormstad HK, et al. Knowledge translation of vision rehabilitation in a multidisciplinary stroke unit. Scand J Optom Vis Sci. 2016;9:16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan EM, Cassie H, Pooley J, et al. Areas for improvement in community optometry: flashes and floaters take priority. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:411–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DC, Berry A, Djuricich AM, et al. What is Implementation Science and what forces are driving a change in medical education? Am J Med Qual. 2017;32:438–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta MJ, Makrai E, Verspoor KM, et al. Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;104:8–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gocuk SA, Lee J-H, Keller PR, et al. Clinical audit as an educative tool for optometrists: an intervention study in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41:53–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runciman WB, Coiera EW, Day RO, et al. Towards the delivery of appropriate health care in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;197:78–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optometry Board of Australia [Internet]. Continuing professional development provider manual. 2012 [cited Feb 20 2020]. Available from: https://www.optometryboard.gov.au/Registration-Standards/CPD.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor A. Using patient decision aids to promote evidence-based decision making. BMJ Evid-Based Med. 2001;6:100–102.
   Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Glaszious P, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based Medicine E-Book. 5th. Elsevier: Edinburgh; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Heraghty J, Cummins R. A layered approach to raising public awareness of macular degeneration in Australia. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1655–1659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar