Anterior chamber depth measurement using Pentacam and Biograph in children

References

• Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, et al. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3074–3080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsorbatzoglou A, Németh G, Széll N, et al. Anterior segment changes with age and during accommodation measured with partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1597–1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:677–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camellin M, Calossi A. A new formula for intraocular lens power calculation after refractive corneal surgery. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:187–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Lisa C, et al. Central vault after phakic intraocular lens implantation: correlation with anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, spherical equivalent, and patient age. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena R, Boekhoorn SS, Mulder PG, et al. Long-term follow-up of endothelial cell change after Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(608–613):e601.
   Google Scholar
• Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:257–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett BT, McGraw PV, Murray LA, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement in clinical practice. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:482–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno-Gimeno I, Espana-Gregori E, Gené-Sampedro A, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement in teenagers. Comparison of two techniques. J Optom. 2013;6:161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon OD. Corneal indentation during ultrasonic pachometry. Cornea. 1999;18:214–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:472–485.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Donnell C, Hartwig A, Radhakrishnan H. Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measured using LenStar LS900, Pentacam, and Visante AS-OCT. Cornea. 2012;31:983–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjeloš Rončević M, Bušić M, Cima I, et al. Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gursoy H, Sahin A, Basmak H, et al. Lenstar versus ultrasound for ocular biometry in a pediatric population. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:912–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson ME, Trivedi RH. Axial length measurement techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26:13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rabsilber TM, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. Anterior chamber measurements using Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:456–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaz U, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, et al. Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:48–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, et al. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2224–2232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q., Ding X., Savini G., et al. Anterior chamber depth measurements using Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography: repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Sen E, Inanc M, Elgin U, et al. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with LenStar and Pentacam in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:171–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Pesudovs K, Wen D, et al. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with rotating Scheimpflug photography and partial coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:341–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uçakhan O, Akbel V, Biyikli Z. Bıyıklı Z et al. Comparison of corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth measurements using the manual keratometer, Lenstar LS 900 and the Pentacam. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013;20:201–206.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Vicent A, Pérez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, et al. Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9:1057–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emamian MH, Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, et al. Cohort Profile: shahroud schoolchildren eye cohort study (SSCECS). Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48:27–27f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapstone R, Clark CV. Diurnal variation in the dimensions of the anterior chamber. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1485–1486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holladay JT, Gills JP, Leidlein J, et al. Achieving emmetropia in extremely short eyes with two piggyback posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1118–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosny M, Alio JL, Claramonte P, et al. Relationship between anterior chamber depth, refractive state, corneal diameter, and axial length. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:336–340.
   Google Scholar
• Ning X, Yang Y, Yan H, et al. Anterior chamber depth - a predictor of refractive outcomes after age-related cataract surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19:134.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson P. Effects of intraocular lens position errors on postoperative refractive error. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:305–311.
   Google Scholar
• Gür Güngör S, Akman A, Asena L, et al. Changes in anterior chamber depth after phacoemulsification in pseudoexfoliative eyes and their effect on accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016;46:255–258.
   Google Scholar
• Engren AL, Behndig A. Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:572–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SW, Chan R, Cheng RC, et al. Effect of cycloplegia on axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements in children. Clin Exp Optom. 2009;92:476–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malyugin BE, Shpak AA, Pokrovskiy DF. Accommodative changes in anterior chamber depth in patients with high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1403–1407.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Vicent A, Monsálvez-Romín D, Del Águila-Carrasco AJ, et al. Changes in the anterior chamber during accommodation assessed with a Scheimpflug system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1790–1797.
   Google Scholar
• Ni Y, Liu XL, Wu MX, et al. Objective evaluation of the changes in the crystalline lens during accommodation in young and presbyopic populations using Pentacam HR system. Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4:611–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, McAlinden C, Su B, et al. The effect of cycloplegia on the lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:1691–1696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson A, Davies LN, Mallen EA, et al. A method for profiling biometric changes during disaccommodation. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:E738–748.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Yekta A, Heydarian S, et al. Heritability of anterior chamber indices in rural population. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:1165–1168.
   Google Scholar
• Onay MP, Eǧilmez S, Üretmen Ö, et al. Evaluation of cornea and anterior chamber using pentacam in pediatric cases. Turk Ophthamol Soc. 2011;41:133–137.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, He X, Xiong S, et al. Distribution of anterior chamber parameters in normal chinese children and the associated factors. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:357–363.
   Google Scholar
• Jin P, Li M, He X, et al. Anterior-chamber angle and axial length measurements in normal chinese children. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:692–697.
   Google Scholar
• Orucoglu F, Akman M, Onal S. Analysis of age, refractive error and gender related changes of the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye with Scheimpflug imaging. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2015;38:345–350.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Mohazzab-Torabi S, et al. Anterior chamber angle and anterior chamber volume in a 40- to 64-year-old population. Eye Cont Lens. 2016;42:244–249.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan M, Elgin U, Sen E, et al. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial lengths of myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic children. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39:335–340.
   Google Scholar
• Yekta A, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, et al. Relationship between refractive errors and ocular biometry components in carpet weavers. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós A, González-Méijome J, Jorge J. Influence of fogging lenses and cycloplegia on open-field automatic refraction. Ophthal Phys Optics. 2008;28:387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar