The appropriateness of and barriers to glaucoma care delivery by Australian optometrists

References

• Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e1221–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman J, Keel S, McGuiness M, et al. Future burden of vision loss in Australia: projections from the National Eye Heatlh Survey. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2020;48:730–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel S, Xie J, Foreman J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the Australian National Eye Health Survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:191–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomised trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:701–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Leske M, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1268–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt TD, Ramanathan SA, Hannaford NA, et al. CareTrack Australia: assessing the appropriateness of adult healthcare: protocol for a retrospective medical record review. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L, et al. Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299:211–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–2645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fremont AM, Lee PP, Mangione CM, et al. Patterns of care for open-angle glaucoma in managed care. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:777–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley J, Huisignh CE, Swain TA, et al. Compliance with primary open-angle glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma suspect preferred practice patterns in a retail-based eye clinic. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:1068–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla A, Patel I, Yuen C, et al. Patterns of adherence to NICE glaucoma guidance in two different service delivery models. Eye. 2012;26:1412–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myint J, Edgar DF, Kotecha A, et al. Barriers perceived by UK-based community optometrists to the detection of primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30:847–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce G, Tatham AJ. Glaucoma management in primary care: barriers perceived by optometrists in Scotland. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:629–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett C, O’Brien C, Butler JS, et al. Barriers to glaucoma case finding as perceived by optometrists in Ireland. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101:90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Sci. 2012;7:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins L, Francis JJ, Islam R, et al. A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Sci. 2017;12:77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L, et al. iCareTrack: measuring the appropriateness of eyecare delivery in Australia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damji KF, Behki R, Wang L. Canadian perspectives in glaucoma management: setting target intraocular pressure range. Can J Ophthalmol. 2003;38:189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Ophthalmological Society Glaucoma Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Ophthalmological Society evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of glaucoma in the adult eye. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009;44:S7–S54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical decisions in glaucoma. St Louis: The CV Mosby Co; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Vrieze SI. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychol Methods. 2012;17:228–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Health workforce locator. [Internet]. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2020. [cited 2021 Jun 10]. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/apps-and-tools/health-workforce-locator/health-workforce-locator.
   Google Scholar
• Huijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Crone MR, et al. Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research. Implementation Sci. 2014;9:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buetow SA. Thematic analysis and its reconceptualization as ‘saliency analysis’. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15:123–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optometry Board of Australia. Registrant data: reporting period 01 January 2020 to 31 March 2020. Australia: AHPRA; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. Heatlh workforce data: optometry Factsheet 2016. Australia: Department of Health; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, et al. Assesing the appropriateness of healthcare delivery in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;197:100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SS, Sanka K, Mettu PS, et al. Resident compliance with the American academy of ophthalmology preferred practice pattern guidelines for primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2462–2469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebardast N, Solus JF, Quigley HA, et al. Comparison of resident and glaucoma faculty practice patterns in the care of open-angle glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihlstin M, Juzych MS, Kromrei HT, et al. Resident compliance With the American academy of ophthalmology preferred practice patterns for primary open-angle glaucoma suspect. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:963–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai CH, Eghdam A, Davoody N, et al. Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life (Basel). 2020;10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht KG, Lee PP. Conformance with preferred practice patterns in caring for patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1668–1671.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog LH, Albrecht KG, LaBree L, et al. Glaucoma care and conformance with preferred practice patterns. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1009–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Friedman DS, Hanhn SR. Evaluation of Practice Patterns for care of open-angle glaucoma compared with claims data: the glaucoma adherence and persistency study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1599–1606.
   Google Scholar
• Castejón-Cervero MA, Jiménez-Parras R, Fernandez-Arias I, et al. Evaluation of compliance with the EGS guidelines in Spain, using Achievable Benchmarks of Care (ABC®) methodology: the IMCA Study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21:149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines for the screening, prognosis, diagnosis, management and prevention of glaucoma. Canberra (ACT): NHMRC; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Feng R, Luk SMH, Wu CHK, et al. Perceptions of training in gonioscopy. Eye. 2019;33:1798–1802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous KF, Kalloniatis M, Hayen A, et al. Application of clinical techniques relevant for glaucoma assessment by optometrists: concordance with guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34:580–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atieno OP. An analysis of the strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. Probl Educ 21st Century. 2009;13:13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Shah R. How well does record abstraction quantify the content of optometric eye examinations in the UK? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29:383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung F-H, Savithiri R. Spotlight on focus groups. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55:218–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualisation and operationalisation. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar