315
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on near work-induced transient myopia

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 296-302 | Received 19 Jul 2021, Accepted 14 Dec 2021, Published online: 24 Jan 2022

References

  • Huang HM, Chang DST, Wu PC. The association between near work activities and myopia in children - A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):1–15.
  • Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Hayes JR, et al. Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(3):837–846.
  • Berntsen DA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, et al. Accommodative lag and juvenile-onset myopia progression in children wearing refractive correction. Vision Res. 2011;51(9):1039–1046.
  • Logan NS, Radhakrishnan H, Cruickshank FE, et al. IMI accommodation and binocular vision in myopia development and progression. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62:5.
  • Schmid KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes: a summary and update. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(6):613–621.
  • Gwiazda J. E., Hyman L., Norton T. T., et al. Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(7):2143–2151.
  • Harb E, Thorn F, Troilo D. Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes. Vision Res. 2006;46(16):2581–2592.
  • Lin Z, Vasudevan B, Liang YB, et al. Baseline characteristics of near work-induced transient myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(12):1725–1733.
  • Vera-Díaz FA, Strang NC, Winn B. Nearwork induced transient myopia during myopia progression. Curr Eye Res. 2002;24(4):289–295.
  • Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Li RW, et al. Nearwork-induced transient myopia in preadolescent Hong Kong Chinese. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(5):2284–2289.
  • Chen Y, Drobe B, Zhang C, et al. Accommodation is unrelated to myopia progression in Chinese myopic children. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–8.
  • Ciuffreda KJ, Vasudevan B. Nearwork-induced transient myopia (NITM) and permanent myopia - Is there a link? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28(2):103–114.
  • Lin Z, Vasudevan B, Zhang YC, et al. Reproducibility of near work-induced transient myopia measurements using the WAM-5500 autorefractor in its dynamic mode. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(10):1477–1483.
  • Ciuffreda KJ, Wallis DM. Myopes show increased susceptibility to near work aftereffects. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(10):1797–1803.
  • Ciuffreda KJ, Lee M. Differential refractive susceptibility to sustained near work. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22(5):372–379.
  • Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ, Gilmartin B. Sympathetic inhibition of accommodation after sustained near work in subjects with myopia and emmetropia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(1):114–120.
  • Sivaraman V, Rizwana JH, Ramani K, et al. Near work-induced transient myopia in Indian subjects. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98(6):541–546.
  • Lin Z, Vasudevan B, Liang YB, et al. The association between near work-induced transient myopia and progression of refractive error: a 3-year cohort report from Beijing Myopia Progression Study. J Optom. 2021;14(1):44–49.
  • Otero C, Aldaba M, Vera-Diaz FA, et al. Effect of experimental conditions in the accommodation response in myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(12):1120–1128.
  • Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. An incremental retinal-defocus theory of the development of myopia. Comments Theor Biol. 2003;8(4–5):511–538.
  • Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ. Additivity of near work-induced transient myopia and its decay characteristics in different refractive groups. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(2):836–841.
  • Arunthavaraja M, Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ. Nearwork-induced transient myopia (NITM) following marked and sustained, but interrupted, accommodation at near. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30(6):766–775.
  • Ciuffreda KJ, Ordonez X. Vision therapy to reduce abnormal near work-induced transient myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(5):311–315.
  • Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ, Ludlam DP. Accommodative training to reduce near work-induced transient myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(11):1287–1294.
  • Nan L, Seger K, Crandall M, et al. Effect of customized near addition lenses on transient myopia induced by near-work. Clin Optom. 2010;2010(2):43–49.
  • Jiang BC, Bussa S, Tea YC, et al. Optimal dioptric value of near addition lenses intended to slow myopic progression. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(11):1100–1105.
  • Guo L, Fan L, Tao J, et al. Use of topical 0.01% atropine for controlling near work-induced transient myopia: a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2020;36(2):97–101.
  • Smith III E. Optical treatment strategies to slow myopia progression: effects of the visual extent of the optical treatment zone. Exp Eye Res. 2013;114:77–88.
  • Neil Charman W, Radhakrishnan H. Peripheral refraction and the development of refractive error: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30(4):321–338.
  • Németh J, Tapasztó B, Aclimandos WA, et al. Update and guidance on management of myopia. European Society of Ophthalmology in cooperation with International Myopia Institute. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;1–31. DOI:10.1177/1120672121998960.
  • Chamberlain P, Peixoto-De-Matos SC, Logan NS, et al. A 3-year randomized clinical trial of misight lenses for myopia control. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96(8):556–567.
  • Ruiz-Pomeda A, Pérez-Sánchez B, Valls I, et al. MiSight Assessment Study Spain (MASS). A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(5):1011–1021.
  • Ruiz-Pomeda A, Villa-Collar C. Slowing the progression of myopia in children with the misight contact lens: a narrative review of the evidence. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020;9(4):783–795.
  • Pomeda AR, P Rez-s Nchez B n, Del Pilar Ca Adas Su Rez M, et al. MiSight assessment study Spain: a comparison of vision-related quality-of-life measures between misight contact lenses and single-vision spectacles. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44:S99–S104.DOI:10.1007/s00417-018-3906-z.
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191.
  • Hofstetter HW. A useful age-amplitude formula. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1950;38(12):42–45.
  • Conlon EG, Lovegrove WJ, Chekaluk E, et al. Measuring visual discomfort. Vis cogn. 1999;6(6):637–663.
  • Hoddes E., Zarcone V., Dement W. Development and use of Stanford Sleepiness scale (SSS). Psychophysiology. 1972;14(6):540–545.
  • Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Banks MS. Vergence – accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vis. 2008;8(33):1–30.
  • Sheppard AL, Davies LN. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30(2):143–151.
  • Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH, et al. Accommodation response and visual discomfort. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(6):625–633.
  • Vera J, Diaz-Piedra C, Jiménez R, et al. Driving time modulates accommodative response and intraocular pressure. Physiol Behav. 2016;164:47–53.
  • Durand AC, Gould GM. A method of determining ocular dominance. JAMA. 1910;55(5):369–370.
  • Krumholz DM, Fox RS, Ciuffreda KJ. Short-term changes in tonic accommodation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27(4):552–557.
  • Kang P, McAlinden C, Wildsoet CF. Effects of multifocal soft contact lenses used to slow myopia progression on quality of vision in young adults. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(1):e43–e53.
  • Kollbaum PS, Jansen ME, Tan J, et al. Vision performance with a contact lens designed to slow myopia progression. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(3):205–214.
  • Ruiz-Pomeda A, Fernandes P, Amorim-de-sousa A, et al. Light disturbance analysis in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight ® Assessment Study Spain (MASS). Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019;42(2):200–205.
  • García-Marqués JV, Macedo-De-Araújo RJ, Cerviño A, et al. Comparison of short-term light disturbance, optical and visual performance outcomes between a myopia control contact lens and a single-vision contact lens. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40(6):718–727.
  • García-Marqués J, Macedo-de-araújo R, Lopes-Ferreira D, et al. Tear film stability over a myopia control contact lens compared to a monofocal design. Clin Exp Optom. 2021. Epub ahead. DOI:10.1080/08164622.2021.1878864.
  • Rosa AM, Miranda ÂC, Patrício MM, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess neuroadaptation to multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(10):1287–1296.
  • Charman WN. Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19(2):126–133.
  • He JC, Gwiazda J, Thorn F, et al. The association of wavefront aberration and accommodative lag in myopes. Vision Res. 2005;45(3):285–290.
  • González-Méijome JM, Peixoto-De-Matos SC, Faria-Ribeiro M, et al. Strategies to regulate myopia progression with contact lenses: a review. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(1):24–34.
  • Felipe-Marquez G, Nombela-Palomo M, Cacho I, et al. Accommodative changes produced in response to overnight orthokeratology. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(4):619–626.
  • Pereira-da-mota AF, Costa J, Amorim-de-sousa A, et al. The impact of overnight orthokeratology on accommodative response in myopic subjects. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3687.
  • Gifford K, Gifford P, Hendicott PL, et al. Near binocular visual function in young adult orthokeratology versus soft contact lens wearers. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(3):184–189.
  • Yang Y, Wang L, Li P, et al. Accommodation function comparison following use of contact lens for orthokeratology and spectacle use in myopic children: a prospective controlled trial. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(7):1234–1238.
  • Song Y, Zhu S, Yang B, et al. Accommodation and binocular vision changes after wearing orthokeratology lens in 8- to 14-year-old myopic children. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;(37). DOI:10.1007/s00417-021-05106-2.
  • Han X, Xu D, Ge W, et al. A comparison of the effects of orthokeratology lens, medcall lens, and ordinary frame glasses on the accommodative response in myopic children. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(4):268–271.
  • Gong CR, Troilo D, Richdale K. Accommodation and phoria in children wearing multifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(3):353–360.
  • Cheng X, Xu J, Brennan NA. Accommodation and its role in myopia progression and control with soft contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39(3):162–171.
  • Altoaimi BH, Almutairi MS, Kollbaum PS, et al. Accommodative behavior of young eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(5):416–427.
  • Ruiz-Alcocer J, Madrid-Costa D, Radhakrishnan H, et al. Changes in accommodation and ocular aberration with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(5):288–294.
  • Altoaimi BH, Kollbaum P, Meyer D, et al. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38(2):152–163.
  • Ciuffreda KJ, Rosenfield M, Rosen J, et al. Accommodative responses to naturalistic stimuli. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990;10(2):168–174.
  • Chung K, Mohidin N, O’Leary DJ. Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression. Vision Res. 2002;42(22):2555–2559.
  • Vasudevan B, Esposito C, Peterson C, et al. Under-correction of human myopia - Is it myopigenic?: a retrospective analysis of clinical refraction data. J Optom. 2014;7(3):147–152.
  • Logan NS, Wolffsohn JS. Role of un-correction, under-correction and over-correction of myopia as a strategy for slowing myopic progression. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(2):133–137.
  • Yazdani N, Sadeghi R, Ehsaei A, et al. Under-correction or full correction of myopia? A meta-analysis. J Optometry. 2021;14(1):11–19.
  • Liang X, Wei S, Li SM, et al. Effect of reading with a mobile phone and text on accommodation in young adults. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;(1). DOI:10.1007/s00417-020-05054-3.
  • Faria-Ribeiro M, Amorim-de-sousa A, González-Méijome JM. Predicted accommodative response from image quality in young eyes fitted with different dual-focus designs. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38(3):309–316.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.