Validity and repeatability of contour-based visotec distance stereoacuity test

References

• Westheimer G. The Ferrier Lecture, 1992. Seeing depth with two eyes: stereopsis. Proc Biol Sci. 1994;257:205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio GF, Poggio T. The analysis of stereopsis. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1984;7:379–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard H. A test for the judgement of distance. Am J Ophthalmol. 1919;2:656–675.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr I, Read JC. Stereoacuity with Frisby and revised FD2 stereo tests. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. The neural coding of stereoscopic depth. Neuroreport. 1997;8:iii–xii.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor AR, Tidbury LP. Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth? Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101:485–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum AL, Stathacopoulos RA. Subjective and objective criteria for recommending surgery in intermittent exotropia. Am Orthoptic J. 1992;42:42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Stathacopoulos RA, Rosenbaum AL, Zanoni D, et al. Distance stereoacuity. Assessing control in intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmol. 1993;100:495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo R, Frosini R, Libero CD, et al. Factors influencing severity of and recovery from anisometropic amblyopia. Strabismus. 2007;15:209–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blakemore C. The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. J Physiol. 1970;211:599–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes JM, Birch EE, Leske DA, et al. New tests of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmol. 2007;114:1215–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singman E, Matta N, Silbert D, et al. Comparison of the INNOVA visual acuity system stereotest with the Frisby-Davis 2 stereotest for the evaluation of distance stereoacuity. Binocul Vis Strabolog. 2013;28:78–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manning ML, Finlay DC, Neill RA, et al. Detection threshold differences to crossed and uncrossed disparities. Vision Res. 1987;27:1683–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam AK, Tse P, Choy E, et al. Crossed and uncrossed stereoacuity at distance and the effect from heterophoria. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:189–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shippman S, Cohen KR. Relationship of heterophoria to stereopsis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:609–610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larson WL. An investigation of the difference in stereoacuity between crossed and uncrossed disparities using Frisby and TNO tests. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:157–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Hatt SR, O’Connor AR, et al. Final version of the Distance Randot Stereotest: normative data, reliability, and validity. J AAPOS. 2010;14:142–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams WE, Leske DA, Hatt SR, et al. Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity. Ophthalmol. 2009;116:281–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seki Y, Wakayama A, Takahashi R, et al. Influence of Test Distance on Stereoacuity in Intermittent Exotropia. Strabismus. 2017;25:12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Wu H. The difference in stereoacuity testing: contour-based and random dot-based graphs at far and near distances. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanCleef K, Read JC, Herbert W, et al. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:507–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu VL, Birch EE, Holmes JM. Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test. J AAPOS. 2006;10:419–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read JC. Stereo vision and strabismus. Eye (Lond). 2015;29:214–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett SL, Birch EE. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders. J AAPOS. 2003;7:333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Wu H. The effect of dot size in random-dot stereograms on the results of stereoacuity measurements. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett SL. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests. J AAPOS. 2005;9:572–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neal TD, Rosenbaum AL, Stathacopoulos RA. Distance stereo acuity improvement in intermittent exotropic patients following strabismus surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1995;32:353–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt SR, Haggerty H, Buck D, et al. Distance stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:219–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhasan M. Clinical evaluation of the MKH-HAASE stereoacuity tests. Vision Dev Rehab. 2018;4:78–86.
   Google Scholar