What we know about the scleral profile and its impact on contact lens fitting

References

• van der Worp E. A Guide to Scleral Lens Fitting [monograph online]. Forest Grove, OR: Pacific University; 2010. http://commons.pacicu.edu/mono/4/
   Google Scholar
• Pullum K. Scleral lenses. Chapter 15. In: Bennett ES, Weissman BA. Clinical Contact Lens Practice. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilson; 2005. p. 629–648.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana AK. Comprehensive Ophthalmology. 4th ed. New Delhi, India: New Age International; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bekerman I, Gottlieb P, Vaiman M. Variations in Eyeball Diameters of the Healthy Adults. J Ophthalmol 2014; 2014: 5. Article ID 503645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzmann M, Caroline PJ, Börret R, et al. An analysis of anterior scleral shape and its role in the design and fitting of scleral contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; 41: 205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott PJ. An analysis of the global contours and haptic contact lens fitting. Br J Physiol Opt 1966; 23: 1–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Apt L. An anatomical reevaluation of rectus muscle insertions. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1980; 78: 365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall LA, Young G, Wolffsohn JS, et al. The influence of corneoscleral topography on soft contact lens fit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 6801–6806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall LA, Hunt C, Young G, et al. Factors affecting corneoscleral topography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 3691–3701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi HJ, Lee SM, Lee JY, et al. Measurement of anterior scleral curvature using anterior segment OCT. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 793–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan B, Graham AD, Tsechpenakis G, et al. A novel analytical method using OCT to describe the corneoscleral junction. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 650–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser ES, Visser R, Van Lier HJ. Advantages of toric scleral lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 4: 233–236.
   Google Scholar
• Iskander DR, Wachel P, Simpson PN, et al. Principles of operation, accuracy and precision of an Eye Surface Profiler. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 266–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNaeyer G, Sanders DR, Farajian TS. Surface coverage with single vs. multiple gaze surface topography to fit scleral lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNaeyer G, Sanders DR, van der Worp E, et al. Qualitative assessment of scleral shape patterns using a new wide field ocular surface elevation topographer: the SSSG study. J Cont Lens Res Sci 2017; 1: 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ensley R, Miller H Finding the Perfect Alignment. Review of Cornea & Contact Lenses March/April 2019:8–9.
   Google Scholar
• 2.0 Online Training - SW Operating Guide. https://eagleteye.egnyte.com/fl/q2kFVu7p8E#folder-link/Online%20ESP%20Training%20Resource%20Folder/Documents?p. Accessed August 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bataille L, Molina-Martin A, Piñero DP. Intrasession repeatability of corneal, limbal and scleral measurements obtained with a Fourier transform profilometer. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021; 44: 101382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNaeyer G, Sanders DR. sMap3d Corneo-Scleral Topographer Repeatability in Scleral Lens Patients. Eye Contact Lens 2018; 44: S259–S264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataille L, Molina-Martin A, Piñero DP. Comparative analysis of two clinical diagnostic methods of the corneoscleral geometry. Eye Contact Lens 2021; 47: 546–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandlitz S, Esper P, Stein M, et al. Corneoscleral topography measured with Fourier-based profilometry and Scheimpflug imaging. Optom Vis Sci 2020; 97: 766–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Martínez-Abad A, Soto-Negro R, et al. Differences in corneo-scleral topographic profile between healthy and keratoconus corneas. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2019; 42: 75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNaeyer G, Sanders DR. Collagen crosslinking for Keratoconus can change scleral shape. J Cont Lens Res Sci 2018; 2: e15–e21.
   Google Scholar
• DeNaeyer G, Sanders DR, Michaud L, et al. Correlation of corneal and scleral topography in cases with ectasias and normal corneas. The SSSG Study. J Cont Lens Res Sci 2019; 3: e10–e20.
   Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Soto-Negro R, Martinez-Abad A, et al. Differences in the corneo-scleral profile measured by Fourier domain profilometry between healthy, post-LASIK, and keratoconus eyes. Poster at ESCRS Viena 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Soto-Negro R, Martinez-Abad A, et al. Characterization of corneo-scleral geometry using Fourier domain profilometry in the healthy eye. Eye Contact Lens 2019; 45: 201–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compañ V, Aguilella-Arzo M, Edrington TB, et al. Modeling corneal oxygen with scleral gas permeable lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1339–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud L, van der Worp E, Brazeau D, et al. Predicting estimates of oxygen transmissibility for scleral lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35: 266–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud L, Lipson M, Kramer E, et al. The official guide to scleral lens terminology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2020; 43: 529–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud L, Laine C Predicting scleral lens trial with the use of two devices. Poster at GSLS 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzmann M Scleral shape study - A study of the anterior scleral shape and its role in scleral lens fitting. Master Thesis - Faculty of Aalen University, Germany; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gee S Are all sagittal measurements created equal; SMap, Pentacam, and Eaglet. Poster at GSLS 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Giasson CJ, Morency J, Melillo M, et al. Oxygen tension beneath scleral lenses of different clearances. Optom Vis Sci 2017; 94: 466–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedlicka J. Initial lens selection. Chapter 8 In: Barnett M, Johns LK. Ophthalmology: current and future developments (Volume 4): Contemporary scleral lenses: Theory and application. Sharjah (United Arab Emirates): Bentham eBooks imprint; 2017. p. 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Johns LK, and Barnett M. Scleral Lens Anatomy. Chapter 2 In: Barnett M, Johns LK. Ophthalmology: Current and future developments (Volume 4): Contemporary scleral lenses: Theory and application. Sharjah (United Arab Emirates): Bentham eBooks imprint; 2017. p. 48–67.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett M, and Fadel D. Clinical guide for scleral lens success. Grand Junction (USA): SLS & AILeS; 2018. p. 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fadel D, Vincent S. Optical considerations for scleral contact lenses: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2019; 42: 598–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasquillo KG, Lipson MJ, and Ezekiel DJ, et al. Scleral Lens Complications and Problem Solving. Chapter 12. In: Barnett M, Johns LK. Ophthalmology: Current and future developments (Volume 4): Contemporary scleral lenses: Theory and application. Sharjah (United Arab Emirates): Bentham eBooks imprint; 2017. p. 303–345.
   Google Scholar
• Otten HM, van der Linden BJJJ, Vissr ES. Clinical performance of a new bitangential mini-scleral lens. Optom Vis Sci 2018; 95: 515–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Viñuela J. Predicting the rotation of back-surface toric scleral lenses with corneo-scleral profilometry. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2019; 42: 27.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Viñuela J Back-surface toric scleral lens stabilization as a function of the amount of toricity. Poster at GSLS 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Viñuela J, Stortelder R When and How to Design a Toric Limbal Zone in a Scleral Lens. Poster at AAO 2020.
   Google Scholar
• 2.0 Online Training - Fit Guide. Accessed November 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley C, Harris MG. Options for vaulting Pingueculae in patients who need specialty contact lenses. Poster at GSLS 2020. Accessed August 2020. https://na.eventscloud.com/website/2486/2020-poster-presentations/
   Google Scholar
• Richlin B, Stortelder B. Designing a scleral lens with two recesses to avoid two pingueculae. Poster at GSLS 2020. Accessed August 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Stortelder R, Broos K. Quantifying the Shape of Pinguecula to Design a Scleral Lens Microvault. Poster at GSLS 2018. Accessed August 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Stortelder R, Telamitsi K MicroVault designing utilizing Profilometry. Poster at GSLS 2020. Accessed August 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Nau A, Shorter ES, Harthan JS, et al. Multicenter review of impression-based scleral devices. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2020; 44: 101380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Soto-Negro R. Use of Fourier domain profilometry to optimize fully scleral lens fitting: a case report. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis 2017; 6: 97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Stortelder R. Expert Level Lens Fitting (part 1). Accessed November 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGfjinplAIw&feature=youtu.be
   Google Scholar
• Carrasquillo K, Buffalo L. ESP Quick Look. Accessed November 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5w4swTu4-U
   Google Scholar
• Carrasquillo K, Snepvangers A Fitting Scleral IG with the ESP. [A most powerful combination. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_NOCu-IY3k. Accessed November 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hamano H, Watanabe K, Hamano T, et al. A study of the complications induced by conventional and disposable contact lenses. Clao J 1994; 20: 103–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeny DF. Have silicone hydrogel lenses eliminated hypoxia? Eye Contact Lens 2013; 39: 53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Brennan NA, González-Méijome J, et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens materials, design, and care subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: TFOS37–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, et al. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye Contact Lens 2013; 39: 92–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, et al. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007; 26: 168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung KK, and Weissman B. Soft Contact Lens Application (Chapter 18). In: Bennett ES, Weissman BA. Clinical Contact Lens Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 1–1072.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Willcox MD, Bron AJ, et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Executive Summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: TFOS7–TFOS13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Worp E, Wolffsohn JS, Jones L. When was the last time you fitted a soft lens? Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2020; 43: 415–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G. Evaluation of soft contact lens fitting characteristics. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorbara L, Maram J, Fonn D, et al. Metrics of the normal cornea: anterior segment imaging with the Visante OCT. Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 150–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achong-Coan R, Caroline P, and Kinoshita B, et al. How do normal and keratoconic eyes differ in shape? Global Specialty Lens Symposium 2012, Poster; Las Vegas, USA; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Worp E. The Science and Skill of Fitting a Soft Lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2017; 32: 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Worp E, Mertz C. Sagittal height differences of frequent replacement silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38: 157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Worp E, Lampa M, and Kinoshita B, et al. Variation in sag values in daily disposable, reusable and toric soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021; 44: 101386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G. Mathematical model for evaluating soft contact lens fit. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: e167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stortelder R, Rojas J, Montani G Not just SAG, a theoretical model to compare the SAG of soft lenses. Poster at GSLS 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Young G. Ocular sagittal height and soft contact lens fit. J Br Cont Lens Assoc 1992; 15: 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hall L. What you need to know about sagittal height and scleral lenses. Understanding the shape of the anterior ocular surface is essential to successful scleral contact lens fitting. Contact Lens Spectrum 2015; 30: 26-28, 30, 32, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Sanchez-Zuriaga D, Martinez-Soria F. White-To-White corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness values of emmetropic subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 2012; 34: 167–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinero DP, Plaza Punche AB, Alio JL. Corneal diameter measurements by corneal topography and angle-to-angle measurements by optical coherence tomography: evaluation of equivalence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufer F, Schroder A, Erb C. White-To-White corneal diameter: Normal values in healthy humans obtained with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea 2005; 24: 259–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledelius HC, Stubgaard M. Changes in refraction and corneal curvature during growth and in adult life. Acta Ophthalmologica Scand 1986; 64: 487–491.
   Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Lydon DPM, Wilson C. Corneal topography: a clinical model. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1986; 6: 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YY, Jiang WJ, Teng ZE. Corneal curvature radius and associated factors in Chinese children: the Shandong Children Eye Study. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0117481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyamu E, Osuobeni E. Age, gender, corneal diameter, corneal curvature and central corneal thickness in Nigerians with normal intra ocular pressure. J Optom 2012; 5: 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, et al. Normal eye growth in emmetropic school children. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 819–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd-Ali B, Afzamshah MAS, Mohammed Z, et al. Ocular dimensions of young Malays in Malaysia. J Sains Kesihatan Malaysia 2011; 9: 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Heydarian S, Hashemi H, Shokrollahzadeh F, et al. The normal distribution of corneal eccentricity and its determinants in two rural areas of north and south of Iran. J Curr Ophthalmol 2017; 30: 147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner LF. Sagittal height of the anterior eye and contact lens fitting. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 59: 301–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michaud L, Tremblay C, and Grégoire S, et al. Relationship between ocular sagittal height and soft contact lens sagittal depth to improve fitting and comfort. Poster presented during the American Academy of Optometry meeting; 2017 in Chicago, Las Vegas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Montani G Evaluation of different methods to select the parameters of soft customized contact lenses. Poster GSLS 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Michaud L, Van der Worp E, Giasson CJ, et al. Determining the soft contact lens sagittal depth to optimize fitting and comfort. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; 41: S93–S94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michaud L, Tremblay C, Grégoire S Relationship between ocular sagittal height and soft contact lens sagittal depth to improve fitting and comfort. Poster at GSLS 2018.
   Google Scholar