Feasibility of providing collaborative glaucoma care from a community optometry perspective: a mixed-methods assessment

References

• Steinmetz JD, Bourne RRA, Briant PS et al. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the right to sight: an analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Global Health 2021; 9: e144–60. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel S, Xie J, Foreman J et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the Australian national eye health survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2019; 103: 191–195. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirani M, Crowston JG, Taylor PS et al. Economic impact of primary open-angle glaucoma in Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 39: 623–632. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02530.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray SF, Spencer IC, Spry PG et al. The Bristol shared care glaucoma study – validity of measurements and patient satisfaction. J Public Health (Bangkok) 1997; 19: 431–436. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray SF, Spry PGD, Brookes ST et al. The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: outcome at follow up at 2 years. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 456. doi:10.1136/bjo.84.5.456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzer-Goor KM, van Sprundel E, Lemij HG et al. Cost-effectiveness of monitoring glaucoma patients in shared care: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10: 312. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spry PG, Spencer IC, Sparrow JM et al. The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 707–712. doi:10.1136/bjo.83.6.707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agency for Clinical Innovation. Community Eye Care (C-EYE-C) Model for Glaucoma and Diabetic Retinopathy. Chatswood, NSW; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ford BK, Angell B, Liew G et al. Improving patient access and reducing costs for glaucoma with integrated hospital and community care: a case study from Australia. Int J Integr Care 2019; 19: 5. doi:10.5334/ijic.4642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson D. The multidisciplinary glaucoma monitoring clinic at the Royal Victorian eye and ear hospital. Aust Orthoptic J 2013; 45: 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Yapp M, Hennessy MP et al. Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia. Clin Exp Optometry 2019; 103: 675–683. doi:10.1111/cxo.13030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Kalloniatis M. Clinical outcomes of the centre for eye health: an intra-professional optometry-led collaborative eye care clinic in Australia. Clin Exp Optometry 2021; 104: 795–804. doi:10.1080/08164622.2021.1878821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly A, Wong E, Huang J et al. Glaucoma community care: does ongoing shared care work? Int J Integr Care 2020; 20: 5. doi:10.5334/ijic.5470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Hennessy MP, Kalloniatis M et al. Implementing collaborative care for glaucoma patients and suspects in Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 46: 826–828. doi:10.1111/ceo.13187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medicare Benefits Schedule Review Taskforce. Taskforce endorsed report from the optometry services clinical committee. In: Medicare Benefits Schedule Review Taskforce, editor. MBS Review - Final taskforce reports, findings and recommendations. Canberra, ACT, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Collaborative Care of glaucoma patients and suspects by ophthalmologists and optometrists in Australia. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Optometry Australia. Clinical practice guide for the diagnosis and management of open angle glaucoma. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Clinical Management Research. Consolidated framework for implementation research Ann Arbor. Centre for Clinical Management Research; 2021. https://cfirguide.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. Implementation Sci 2015; 10: 21. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernández ME et al. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implementation Sci 2019; 14: 42. doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi H, Copeland SP, Turner AW. Increasing the impact of teleophthalmology in Australia: analysis of structural and economic drivers in a state service. Aust J Rural Health 2017; 25: 45–52. doi:10.1111/ajr.12277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHMRC (National Health and Medical Research Council). NHMRC Guidelines for the screening, prognosis, diagnosis, management and prevention of glaucoma 2010. Canberra, ACT, Australia; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Malik R, Baker H, Russell RA et al. A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002067. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Jofre-Bonet M, Panca M et al. An economic comparison of hospital-based and community-based glaucoma clinics. Eye (Lond) 2012; 26: 967–971. doi:10.1038/eye.2012.73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu TC, Semsarian CR, White A et al. Journey to glaucoma care – trusting but uncertain and uninformed: a qualitative study. Clin Exp Optometry 2020; 103: 484–489. doi:10.1111/cxo.12955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar