831
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Clinical application of the Swiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer for corneal sensitivity measurement

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 14-22 | Received 16 Aug 2022, Accepted 10 Mar 2023, Published online: 05 Apr 2023

References

  • Rózsa AJ, Beuerman RW. Density and organization of free nerve endings in the corneal epithelium of the rabbit. Pain 1982; 14: 105–120. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(82)90092-6
  • Acosta MC, Tan ME, Belmonte C, et al. Sensations evoked by selective mechanical, chemical, and thermal stimulation of the conjunctiva and cornea. IOVS 2001; 42: 2063–2067.
  • Müller LJ, Marfurt CF, Kruse F, et al. Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function. Exp Eye Res 2003; 76: 521–542. doi:10.1016/S0014-4835(03)00050-2
  • Belmonte C, Nichols JJ, Cox SM, et al. TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report. Ocul Surf 2017; 15: 404–437. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.002
  • Jordan A, Baum J. Basic tear flow. Does it exist? Ophthalmology 1980; 87: 920–930. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(80)35143-9
  • Doane MG. Blinking and the mechanics of the lacrimal drainage system. Ophthalmology 1981; 88: 844–851. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(81)34940-9
  • Wu Z, Begley CG, Situ P, et al. The effects of increasing ocular surface stimulation on blinking and sensation. IOVS 2014; 55: 1555–1563. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13780
  • Roszkowska AM, Colosi P, Ferreri FMB, et al. Age-related modifications of corneal sensitivity. Ophthalmologica 2004; 218: 350–355. doi:10.1159/000079478
  • Acosta MC, Alfaro ML, Borrás F, et al. Influence of age, gender and iris color on mechanical and chemical sensitivity of the cornea and conjunctiva. Exp Eye Res 2006; 83: 932–938. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2006.04.018
  • Murphy PJ, Patel S, Kong N, et al. Noninvasive assessment of corneal sensitivity in young and elderly diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. IOVS 2004; 45: 1737–1742. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0689
  • Golebiowski B, Papas EB, Stapleton F. Factors affecting corneal and conjunctival sensitivity measurement. OVS 2008; 85: E241–246. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181694f96
  • Nosch DS, Käser E, Bracher T, et al. Age-related changes in corneal sensitivity. Cornea 2022; online ahead of print.
  • Spadea L, Salvatore S, Vingolo EM. Corneal sensitivity in keratoconus: a review of the literature. Sci World J 2013; 2013: 1–7. doi:10.1155/2013/683090
  • Chao C, Golebiowski B, Stapleton F. The role of corneal innervation in LASIK-induced neuropathic dry eye. Ocul Surf 2014; 12: 32–45. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2013.09.001
  • Mathers WD, Jester JV, Lemp MA. Return of human corneal sensitivity after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 210–211. doi:10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130220030
  • Al-Aqaba MA, Otri AM, Fares U, et al. Organization of the regenerated nerves in human corneal grafts. Am J Ophtalmol 2012; 153: 29–37.e4. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.006
  • Stapleton F, Marfurt C, Golebiowski B, et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on neurobiology. IOVS 2013; 54: TFOS71. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13226
  • Tavakoli M, Petropoulos IN, Malik RA. Assessing corneal nerve structure and function in diabetic neuropathy: cornea and diabetic neuropathy: a review. Clin Exp Optom 2012; 95: 338–347. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00743.x
  • Cochet P, Bonnet R. L’esthéseiométrie cornéenne. Réalisation et intérêt pratique. Bulletin Societés d’Ophtalmologie de France. 1961; 6: 541–550.
  • Murphy PJ, Lawrenson JG, Patel S, et al. Reliability of the Non-Contact Corneal Aesthesiometer and its comparison with the Cochet–Bonnet aesthesiometer. OPO 1998; 18: 532–539. doi:10.1016/S0275-5408(98)00021-0
  • Millodot M, Larson W. Effect of bending of the nylon thread of the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer upon the recorded pressure. The Contact Lens 1967; 1: 5–6.
  • Golebiowski B, Papas E, Stapleton F. Assessing the sensory function of the ocular surface: implications of use of a non-contact air jet aesthesiometer versus the Cochet–Bonnet aesthesiometer. Exp Eye Res 2011; 92: 408–413. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2011.02.016
  • Lum E, Murphy PJ. Effects of ambient humidity on the Cochet–Bonnet aesthesiometer. Eye 2018; 32: 1644–1651. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0150-z
  • Chao C, Stapleton F, Badarudin E, et al. Ocular Surface Sensitivity Repeatability with Cochet-Bonnet Esthesiometer. OVS 2015; 92: 183–189. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000472
  • Belmonte C, Acosta M, Schmelz M, et al. Measurement of corneal sensitivity to mechanical and chemical stimulation with a CO2 esthesiometer. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1999; 40: 513–519.
  • Stapleton F. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity to air stimuli. BJO 2004; 88: 1547–1551. doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.044024
  • Feng Y, Simpson TL. Nociceptive sensation and sensitivity evoked from human cornea and conjunctiva stimulated by CO 2. IOVS 2003; 44: 529–532. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0003
  • Murphy P, Morgan P, Patel S, et al. A new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer. OPO 1996; 16: 101–107. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.1996.95001026.x
  • Vega JA, Simpson TL, Fonn D. A noncontact pneumatic esthesiometer for measurement of ocular sensitivity: a preliminary report. Cornea 1999; 18: 675–681. doi:10.1097/00003226-199911000-00009
  • Nosch DS, Pult H, Albon J, et al. Does air gas aesthesiometry generate a true mechanical stimulus for corneal sensitivity measurement? Clin Exp Optom 2018; 101: 193–199. doi:10.1111/cxo.12603
  • Golebiowski B, Lim M, Papas E, et al. Understanding the stimulus of an air-jet aesthesiometer: computerised modelling and subjective interpretation. OPO 2013; 33: 104–113. doi:10.1111/opo.12025
  • Ehrmann K, Saha M, Falk D. A novel method to stimulate mechanoreceptors and quantify their threshold values. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2018; 4: 025004. doi:10.1088/2057-1976/aa9b8d
  • Nosch DS, Oscity M, Steigmeier P, et al. Working principle and relevant physical properties of the Swiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer for Corneal Sensitivity (SLACS) evaluation. OPO 2022; 42: 609–618. doi:10.1111/opo.12962
  • Schiffman RM. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 615–621. doi:10.1001/archopht.118.5.615
  • Golebiowski B, Papas E, Stapleton F. Corneal mechanical sensitivity measurement using a staircase technique. OPO 2005; 25: 246–253. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00295.x
  • Russell RA, Crabb DP, Malik R, et al. The relationship between variability and sensitivity in large-scale longitudinal visual field data. IOVS 2012; 53: 5985–5990. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10428
  • Murphy PJ, Armstrong E, Woods LA. A comparison of corneal and conjunctival sensitivity to a thermally cooling stimulus. In: Sullivan D, Stern M Tsubota K, et al., editors. Lacrimal gland, tear film, and dry eye syndromes 3. Vol. 506. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2002. p. 719–722.
  • Situ P, Simpson TL, Fonn D. Eccentric variation of corneal sensitivity to pneumatic stimulation at different temperatures and with CO2. Exp Eye Res 2007; 85: 400–405. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2007.06.006
  • Patel DV, Tavakoli M, Craig JP, et al. Corneal sensitivity and slit scanning in vivo confocal microscopy of the subbasal nerve plexus of the normal central and peripheral human cornea. Cornea 2009; 28: 735–740. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318193e0e3
  • Golebiowski B, Chao C, Stapleton F, et al. Corneal nerve morphology, sensitivity, and tear neuropeptides in contact lens wear. OVS 2017; 94: 534–542. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001063