Comparison of vision performance of spectacles prescribed to 0.05D versus 0.25D steps

References

• Naidoo KS, Leasher J, Bourne RR et al. Global vision impairment and blindness due to uncorrected refractive error, 1990–2010. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 227–234. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 614–618. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G. Relation between spherical refractive error and visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 591–598. doi:10.1097/00006324-199108000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman CE, Evans BJ. Investigation of the causes of non-tolerance to optometric prescriptions for spectacles. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00682.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz L, Schrader S, Ruben R et al. Can the red-green duochrome test be used prior to correcting the refractive cylinder component? Plos One 2015; 10: e0118874. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momeni-Moghaddam H, Goss DA. Comparison of four different binocular balancing techniques. Clin Exp Optom 2014; 97: 422–425. doi:10.1111/cxo.12198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimouni M, Shamir RR, Cohen AD et al. A comparison of different scoring terminations rules for visual acuity testing: from a computer simulation to a clinical study. Curr Eye Res 2019; 44: 790–795. doi:10.1080/02713683.2019.1589524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi A, Cagenello R. On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1993; 34: 120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah N, Dakin SC, Redmond T et al. Vanishing optotype acuity: repeatability and effect of the number of alternatives. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 17–22. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00806.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah N, Dakin SC, Whitaker HL et al. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test–retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2014; 55: 1386–1392. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2010; 51: 5537–5545. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papas EB, Keay L, Golebiowski B. Estimating a just-noticeable difference for ocular comfort in contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2011; 52: 4390–4394. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-7051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang NC, Gray LS, Winn B et al. Clinical evaluation of patient tolerance to autorefractor prescriptions. Clin Exp Optom 1998; 81: 112–118. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.1998.tb06729.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 367–375. doi:10.1097/00006324-199706000-00019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Schmid KL, Edwards KP et al. The effect of under and over refractive correction on visual performance and spectacle lens acceptance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 255–261. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00588.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller AD, Kris MJ, Griffiths AC. Effect of small focal errors on vision. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 521–526. doi:10.1097/00006324-199707000-00020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Cousens SN. The effect of optical defocus on the test–retest variability of visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2004; 45: 1076–1079. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walline JJ, Bailey MD, Zadnik K. Vision-specific quality of life and modes of refractive error correction. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 648–652. doi:10.1097/00006324-200012000-00011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OPSM Australia [Internet]. Clarifye. 2020 [accessed 2023 Jan 20]. https://www.opsm.com.au/clarifye-digital-eye-exam.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 577–579. doi:10.1097/00006324-199508000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar