Effects of induced aniseikonia on binocular visual acuity

References

• Kramer PW, Lubkin V, Pavlica M, et al. Symptomatic aniseikonia in unilateral and bilateral pseudophakia. A projection space eikonometer study. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 1999; 14: 183–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• South J, Gao T, Collins A et al. Aniseikonia and anisometropia: implications for suppression and amblyopia. Clin Exp Optom 2019; 102: 556–565. doi:10.1111/cxo.12881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krarup T, Nisted I, Kjaerbo H et al. Measuring aniseikonia tolerance range for stereoacuity - a tool for the refractive surgeon. Acta Ophthalmol 2021; 99: e43–53. doi:10.1111/aos.14507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutstein RP, Fullard RJ, Wilson JA et al. Aniseikonia induced by cataract surgery and its effect on binocular vision. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: 201–207. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Lee J, Lu J, et al. Effects of simulated anisometropia and aniseikonia on stereopsis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020; 40: 323–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugarte M, Williamson TH. Aniseikonia associated with epiretinal membranes. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1576–1580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y, et al. Aniseikonia and foveal microstructure after retinal detachment surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2014; 55: 4880–4885.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez JR, Ponce AR, Jiménez del Barco L, et al. Impact of induced aniseikonia on stereopsis with random-dot stereogram. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highman VN. Stereopsis and aniseikonia in uniocular aphakia. Br J Ophthalmol 1977; 61: 30–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oguchi Y, Mashima Y. The influence of aniseikonia on the VEP by random-dot stereogram. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1989; 67: 127–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham K, Katsou MF, Rae S. Advising patients on visual fitness to drive: implications of revised DVLA regulations. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 99: 545–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Wilkinson ME. Vision and driving: the United States. J Neuroophthalmol 2010; 30: 170–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdan-Ashoori P, Ten Hove M. Vision and driving: Canada. J Neuroophthalmol 2010; 30: 177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assessing Fitness to Drive for commercial and private vehicle drivers 2016. Medical standards for licensing and clinical management guidelines, a resource for health professionals in Australia. As amended up to August 2017. Sydney, Australia: Austroads, National Transport Commision Australia; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Katsumi O, Tanino T, Hirose T. Effect of aniseikonia on binocular function. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1986; 27: 601–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin GS, Muñoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2000; 41: 3327–3334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan LL. New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at far and near distances. Am J Ophthalmol 1959; 48: 807–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris IF, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, et al. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94: 91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976; 53: 740–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carkeet A. Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced-choice options. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 529–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey IL. Designation of visual acuity in logarithmic units. Optom Monthly 1980; 71: 80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie-Kitchin JE, Brown B. Repeatability and intercorrelations of standard vision tests as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 412–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siman-Tov Z, Lev M, Polat U. Binocular summation is affected by crowding and tagging. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 4843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Troutbeck R. Effect of visual impairment on driving. Hum Factors 1994; 36: 476–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Garth D, Grounds G, et al. Pupil dilatation does affect some aspects of daytime driving performance. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 1387–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Carberry TP. Bilateral cataract surgery and driving performance. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 1277–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carkeet A, Wood JM, Robinson A, et al. Driving speed is altered by monocular neutral density filters: the Enright phenomenon. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 38–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carkeet A, Wood JM, McNeill KM, et al. The Enright phenomenon. Stereoscopic distortion of perceived driving speed induced by monocular pupil dilation. J Optom 2017; 10: 233–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar