A comparative study of pupil offset measurement using Pentacam and Keratron Scout in myopic young adults

References

• Lee SB, Hwang BS, Lee J. Effects of decentration of photorefractive keratectomy on the induction of higher order wavefront aberrations. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 731–743. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20091209-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, He X, Chen F. Theoretical analysis of wavefront aberration from treatment decentration with oblique incidence after conventional laser refractive surgery. Opt Express 2010; 18: 22418–22431. doi:10.1364/OE.18.022418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung B, Lee H, Roberts CJ et al. Decentration measurements using Placido corneal tangential curvature topography and Scheimpflug tomography pachymetry difference maps after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019; 45: 1067–1073. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Clear-cornea cataract surgery: pupil size and shape changes, along with anterior chamber volume and depth changes. A Scheimpflug imaging study. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 8: 2141. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S68370
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee H, Roberts CJ, Arba-Mosquera S et al. Relationship between decentration and induced corneal higher-order aberrations following small-incision lenticule extraction procedure. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2018; 59: 2316–2324. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang Y, Chen X et al. Clinical outcomes of corneal refractive surgery comparing centration on the corneal vertex with the pupil center: a meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol 2020; 40: 3555–3563. doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01506-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M et al. Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refractive Surg 2013; 39: 598–604. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fityo S, Bühren J, Shajari M et al. Keratometry versus total corneal refractive power: analysis of measurement repeatability with 5 different devices in normal eyes with low astigmatism. J Cataract Refractive Surg 2016; 42: 569–576. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamorita T, Nakayama N, Uozato H. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal curvature measurements using the Pentacam and Keratron topography systems. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 539–544. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20090512-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna RR, De Sanctis U, Catalano M et al. Placido disk-based topography versus high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug camera for corneal power measurements in keratoconic and post-LASIK eyes: reliability and agreement. Int J Ophthalmol, Engl Ed 2017; 10: 453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorkin N, Ohri A, Jung H et al. Factors affecting central corneal thickness measurement agreement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 105: 1371–1375. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Is topography-guided ablation profile centered on the corneal vertex better than wavefront-guided ablation profile centered on the entrance pupil? J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 139–143. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20111115-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbelaez MC, Vidal C, Arba-Mosquera S. Clinical outcomes of corneal vertex versus central pupil references with aberration-free ablation strategies and lasik. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2008; 49: 5287–5294. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanellopoulos AJ. Topography-guided hyperopic and hyperopic astigmatism femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: long-term experience with the 400 Hz eye-Q excimer platform. Clin Ophthalmol 2012; 6: 895. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S23573
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmol 2016; 123: 1036–1042. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Gatinel D, Reinstein DZ et al. Refractive surgery beyond 2020. Eye 2021; 35: 362–382. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS et al. The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res 2018; 62: 134–149. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M, Chen M, Liu W et al. Comparative study of wave-front aberration and corneal asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short and long term study. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19: 1–9. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1084-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Rowe EL et al. Distribution of pupil offset and angle Kappa in a refractive surgery preoperative population of 750 myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes. J Refract Surg 2021; 37: 49–58. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20201109-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Vicent A, Monsálvez-Romín D, Pérez-Vives C et al. Measurement of angle Kappa with Orbscan II and Galilei G4: effect of accommodation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252: 249–255. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2509-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhao J, Miao H et al. Mild decentration measured by a Scheimpflug camera and its impact on visual quality following SMILE in the early learning curve. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2014; 55: 3886–3892. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Carbonelli M, Sbreglia A et al. Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refractive Surg 2011; 37: 1679–1685. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanellopoulos AJ. Scheimpflug vs scanning-slit corneal tomography: comparison of corneal and anterior chamber tomography indices for repeatability and agreement in healthy eyes. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14: 2583. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S251998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herber R, Lenk J, Pillunat LE et al. Agreement and repeatability of corneal tomography in healthy eyes using a new swept-source OCT, a rotating Scheimpflug camera, and a dual Scheimpflug–Placido system. J Cataract Refractive Surg 2022; 48: 190–198. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Zhang X, Zhou X. Relationship of location between tear film center and corneal vertex following small-incision lenticule extraction. Ophthalmol Ther 2022; 11: 1163–1174. doi:10.1007/s40123-022-00496-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabed IS, Saad A, Guilbert E et al. Measurement of pupil center shift in refractive surgery candidates with caucasian eyes using infrared pupillometry. J Refract Surg 2014; 30: 694–700. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140903-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Zhou X, Qian Y. Decentration following femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism and its impact on visual quality. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19: 1–9. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1153-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arba Mosquera S, Ewering T. New asymmetric centration strategy combining pupil and corneal vertex information for ablation procedures in refractive surgery: theoretical background. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 567–575. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20120703-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin M, Yuan Y, Wang Y et al. Comparison of preoperative angle Kappa measurements in the eyes of cataract patients obtained from Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry, and ray-tracing aberrometry. BMC Ophthalmol 2022; 22: 153. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-02116-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharaee H, Shafiee M, Hoseini R et al. Angle Kappa measurements: normal values in healthy Iranian population obtained with the Orbscan II. Iran Red Crescent Me 2015; 17: 17873. doi:10.5812/ircmj.17873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar