Clinical indicators for diabetic eyecare delivered by optometrists in Australia: a Delphi study

References

• McGinty J, Anderson G. Predictors of physician compliance with American heart association guidelines for acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care Nurs Q 2008; 31: 161–172. doi:10.1097/01.CNQ.0000314476.64377.12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. UK: Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA et al. Caretrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 100–105. doi:10.5694/mja12.10510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L et al. Icaretrack: measuring the appropriateness of eyecare delivery in Australia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020; 40: 433–441. doi:10.1111/opo.12699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Clinical Studies. Evidence–practice gaps report. Melbourne; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman J, Xie J, Keel S et al. The prevalence and causes of vision loss in indigenous and non-indigenous Australians: the national eye health survey. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 1743–1752. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AX, Hsueh J, Han MM et al. Examination practices and referral of patients with diabetic retinopathy by optometrists in routine clinical care. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2019; 50: 608–612. doi:10.3928/23258160-20191009-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L et al. Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 646. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4493-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyawali R, Ho KC, Toomey M et al. Level of appropriate primary diabetic eyecare delivered and achievable in optometry practices in Australia. Clin Exp Optom 2023; 106: 1–7. doi:10.1080/08164622.2022.2033107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy. Canberra: NHMRC; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna S, Baggoley G, Fist G et al. Optometry Australia - guidelines on the examination and management of patients with diabetes. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 120–126. doi:10.1111/cxo.12340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? Jama 1988; 260: 1743–1748. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A et al. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf 2003; 326: 816–819. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7393.816.
   Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Rahardjo D, Stapleton F et al. Can the appropriateness of eye care be measured through cross-sectional retrospective patient record review in eye care practices in Australia? The iCaretrack feasibility study. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e024298. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schang L, Blotenberg I, Boywitt D. What makes a good quality indicator set? A systematic review of criteria. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33: mzab107. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzab107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper P, Boucher MC, Cruess A et al. Canadian ophthalmological society evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol 2012; 47: S1–S54. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2011.12.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyawali R, Toomey M, Stapleton F et al. Systematic review of diabetic eye disease practice guidelines: more applicability, transparency and development rigor are needed. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 140: 56–68. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoaku WM, Ghanchi F, Bailey C et al. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema pathways and management: UK consensus working group. Eye (Lond) 2020; 34: 1–51. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-0961-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda K, Kaso M, Ohtera S et al. Updating quality indicators for low-risk labour care in Japan using current clinical practice guidelines: a modified Delphi method. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e023595. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melissa CB, Michelle EK, George PB et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010; 182: E839. doi:10.1503/cmaj.090449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles LK, Hooper TD, Hibbert PD et al. Clinical indicators for common paediatric conditions: processes, provenance and products of the CareTrack kids study. PloS One 2019; 14: e0209637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti R, Harper CA, Keeffe JE. Diabetic retinopathy management guidelines. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2012; 7: 417–439. doi:10.1586/eop.12.52.
   Google Scholar
• Yau JWY, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 556–564. doi:10.2337/dc11-1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel S, Xie J, Foreman J et al. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Australian adults with self-reported diabetes: the national eye health survey. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 977–984. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomey M, Ho KC, Gyawali R et al. The appropriateness of and barriers to glaucoma care delivery by Australian optometrists. Clin Exp Optom 2022; 105: 593–601. doi:10.1080/08164622.2021.2004861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JI, Regillo CD, Sadda SR et al. Artificial intelligence detection of diabetic retinopathy: subgroup comparison of the EyeArt system with ophthalmologists’ dilated examinations. Ophthalmol Sci 2022; 3: 100228. doi:10.1016/j.xops.2022.100228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Virgili G, Menchini F, Casazza G et al. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of macular oedema in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 1: Cd008081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008081.pub3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang V, Symons RCA, Guest D et al. An overview of optometrists’ diabetic retinopathy practice patterns - a cross-sectional survey. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2021; 41: 885–895. doi:10.1111/opo.12798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CW, Glassman AR, Beaulieu WT et al. Effect of initial management with aflibercept vs laser photocoagulation vs observation on vision loss among patients with diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula and good visual acuity: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321: 1880–1894. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.5790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch C, Fraser-Bell S, Zur D et al. Real-world outcomes of observation and treatment in diabetic macular edema with very good visual acuity: the obtain study. Acta Diabetol 2019; 56: 777–784. doi:10.1007/s00592-019-01310-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey PP, Murchison AP, Pizzi LT et al. Impact of physician communication on diabetic eye examination adherence: results from a retrospective cohort analysis. Retina 2016; 36: 20–27. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Optometric Association Evidence-Based Optometry Guideline Development Group. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline: eye care of the patient with diabetes mellitus. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: American Optometric Association; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST et al. Diabetic retinopathy preferred practice pattern. Ophthalmology 2020; 127: 66–P145. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade SV, Davey CJ, Shickle D. Can data in optometric practice be used to provide an evidence base for ophthalmic public health? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 503–511. doi:10.1111/opo.12291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyawali R, Toomey M, Stapleton F et al. Enhancing the appropriateness of eyecare delivery: the iCaretrack approach. Clin Exp Optom 2023; 2023: 1–11. doi:10.1080/08164622.2023.2178286.
   Google Scholar
• James MT, Pannu N, Barry R et al. A modified Delphi process to identify process of care indicators for the identification, prevention and management of acute kidney injury after major surgery. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2015; 2: 47. doi:10.1186/s40697-015-0047-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PloS One 2011; 6: e20476. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J et al. Guidance on conducting and REporting DElphi studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med 2017; 31: 684–706. doi:10.1177/0269216317690685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kötter T, Schaefer FA, Scherer M et al. Involving patients in quality indicator development - a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2013; 7: 259–268. doi:10.2147/PPA.S39803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyawali R, Toomey M, Stapleton F et al. Multiple things going on at the same time: determinants of appropriate primary diabetic eyecare delivery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2022; 42: 71–81. doi:10.1111/opo.12912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomey M, Gyawali R, Stapleton F et al. Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of eye care by optometrists: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2021; 41: 782–797. doi:10.1111/opo.12801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar