Developing realistic benchmarks for glaucoma care delivery

References

• Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2017; 5: e1221–1234. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel S, Xie J, Foreman J et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the Australian National eye health survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2019; 103: 191–195. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt TD, Ramanathan SA, Hannaford NA et al. CareTrack Australia: assessing the appropriateness of adult healthcare: protocol for a retrospective medical record review. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e000665. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomised trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 701–713. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Leske M, Bengtsson B et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 1268–1279. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma R, Lee PP, Goldberg I et al. An assessment of the health and economic burdens of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 152: 515–522. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Brennan GP. Does adherence to the guideline recommendation for active treatments improve the quality of care for patients with acute low back pain delivered by physical therapists? Med Care 2007; 45: 973–980. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318070c6cd.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L et al. Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 646. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4493-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KC, Stapleton F, Wiles L et al. iCaretrack: measuring the appropriateness of eyecare delivery in Australia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020; 40: 433–441. doi:10.1111/opo.12699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Commission Resources. Benchmarking in health care. 2nd ed. Oakbrook Terrace (USA): Joint Commission Resources; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd N, Meehan TJ, Davidson F et al. An evaluation of a benchmarking initiative in extended treatment mental health services. Aust Health Rev 2010; 34: 328–333. doi:10.1071/AH09698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefe CI, Weissman NW, Allison JJ et al. Methodology matters-XII. Identifying achievable benchmarks of care: concepts and methodology. Int J Qual Health Care 1998; 10: 443–447. doi:10.1093/intqhc/10.5.443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gude WT, Brown B, van der Veer SN, et al. Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence. Implement Sci 2019; 14: 39. [accessed 2021 Nov 13]. implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/article/10.1186/s13012-13019-10887-13011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thonon F, Watson J, Saghatchian M. Benchmarking facilities providing care: an international overview of initiatives. SAGE Open Med 2015; 3: 2050312115601692. doi:10.1177/2050312115601692.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis J. Sharing the evidence: clinical practice benchmarking to improve continuously the quality of care. J Adv Nurs 2000; 32: 215–225. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01429.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelezang F, Heeringen H. Benchmarking: comparing apples to apples. In: Sadowski C Zimmermann T, editors. Rethinking productivity in software engineering. Berkeley (CA): Apress; 2019. p. 205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD et al. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedbackA randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285: 2871–2879. doi:10.1001/jama.285.22.2871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman NW, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI et al. Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking. J Eval Clin Pract 1999; 5: 269–281. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00203.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runciman WB, Coiera EW, Day RO et al. Towards the delivery of appropriate health care in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 78–81. doi:10.5694/mja12.10799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castejón-Cervero MA, Jiménez-Parras R, Fernandez-Arias I et al. Evaluation of compliance with the EGS guidelines in Spain, using Achievable Benchmarks of Care (ABC®) methodology: the IMCA Study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2011; 21: 149–155. doi:10.5301/EJO.2010.5973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous KF, Kalloniatis M, Hayen A et al. Application of clinical techniques relevant for glaucoma assessment by optometrists: concordance with guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 580–591. doi:10.1111/opo.12146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien SM, Delong ER, Peterson ED. Impact of case volume on hospital performance assessment. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 1277–1284. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.12.1277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arling G, Reeves M, Ross J et al. Estimating and reporting on the quality of inpatient stroke care by Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012; 5: 44–51. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.961474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2018–2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 262–267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 105: 1. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ivers N, Sales A, Colquhoun HL et al. No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci 2014; 9: 14. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gude WT, Roos-Blom M-J, van der Veer SN et al. Health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units. Implement Sci 2018; 13: 33. doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0727-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar