References
- Buller AJ, Chatzinikolas K, Giannopoulos N et al. Digit preference in Goldmann applanation tonometry: the hedgehog effect. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140: 527–529. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.046.
- Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol 1966; 50: 570–586. doi:10.1136/bjo.50.10.570.
- Rozwat A, Roberts DK. Even-number measurement bias with Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2020; 29: 124–126. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001412.
- Egli M, Goldblum D, Kipfer A et al. Assessment of a new Goldmann applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 42–46. doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.182469.
- Sakaue Y, Ueda J, Seki M et al. Evaluation of the new digital Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure. J Ophthalmol 2014; 461681. doi:10.1155/2014/461681.
- Chauhan BC, Mikelberg FS, Balaszi AG et al. Canadian glaucoma study: 2. risk factors for the progression of open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 1030–1036. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.8.1030.
- Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 48–56. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.1.48.
- Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L et al. Predictors of long-term progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 1965–1972. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016.
- Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L et al. Factors for progression and glaucoma treatment: the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15: 102–106. doi:10.1097/00055735-200404000-00008.