Towards an Inventive Ethics of Carefull Risk: Unsettling Research Through DIY Academic Archiving

References

• Ashton, Jenna. 2017a. “The Feminists Are Cackling in the Archive … .” Feminist Review 115 (1): 155–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0024-4.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, Jenna. 2017b. “Feminist Archiving [a Manifesto Continued]: Skilling for Activism and Organising.” Australian Feminist Studies 32 (1): 126–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2017.1357010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, Les, and Nirmal Puwar. 2012. Live Methods. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Karen S., and Helena Karasti. 2018. “Data Care and Its Politics: Designing for Local Collective Data Management as a Neglected Thing.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers 1 (10): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210587.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, Jeanette A., and Andrew Flinn. 2020. Community Archives, Community Spaces: Heritage, Memory and Identity. London: Facet Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, Maxine, Tina Miller, Melanie Mauthner, and Julie Jessop. 2002. “Introduction.” In Ethics in Qualitative Research, edited by Melanie Mauthner, Maxine Birch, Julie Jessop, and Tina Miller, 1–13. London: SAGE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bly, Lyz, and Kelly Wooten. 2012. Make Your Own History: Documenting Feminist & Queer Activism in the 21st Century. Los Angeles: Litwin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, Alex, Lynda Cheshire, and Michael Emmison. 2009. “Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing.” Sociology 43 (6): 1163–1180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509345704.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, Michelle. 2016. “‘The Archive’ Is Not an Archives: On Acknowledging the Intellectual Contributions of Archival Studies.” Reconstruction 16 (1): 3–22. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, Michelle, and Marika Cifor. 2016. “From Human Rights to Feminist Ethics: Radical Empathy in the Archives.” Archivaria 81 (Spring): 23–43. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/687705.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, Michelle, and Marika Cifor. 2021. “Revisiting A Feminist Ethics of Care in Archives: An Introductory Note.” Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 3: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, James I. 2000. Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability, Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, Lynda, Alex Broom, and Michael Emmison. 2009. “Archiving Qualitative Data in Australia: An Introduction.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 44 (3): 239–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2009.tb00144.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen, Kimberly, and Jane Anderson. 2019. “Toward Slow Archives.” Archival Science 19 (2): 87–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09307-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifor, Marika, Patricia Garcia, T. L. Cowan, Jasmine Rault, Tonia Sutherland, Anita Say Chan, Jennifer Rode, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, Niloufar Salehi, and Lisa Nakamura. 2019. “Feminist Data Manifest-No.” Feminist Data Manifest-No. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://www.manifestno.com.
   Google Scholar
• Clayoquot Lives. n.d. Clayoquot Lives: An Ecofeminist Story Web. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://clayoquotlives.sps.ed.ac.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Terry. 2013. “Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms.” Archival Science 13 (2): 95–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7.
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas-Parra, Patricio, and Kay Tisdall. 2019. “Child-led Research: Questioning Knowledge.” Social Sciences 8 (2): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020044.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Emma. 2017. “Saying it Like it is? Power, Participation and Research Involving Young People.” Social Inclusion 5 (3): 228–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i3.967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DIY Academic Archiving. n.d. Accessed Oct 14, 2021. http://www.diyacademicarchiving.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Jennifer, Alexandra Alisauskas, and Devon Mordell. 2019. “‘Treat Them with the Reverence of Archivists’: Records Work, Grief Work, and Relationship Work in the Archives.” Archivaria 88 (2019): 84–120.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Rosalind, and Melanie Mauthner. 2002. “Ethics and Feminist Research: Theory and Practice.” In Ethics in Qualitative Research, edited by Melanie Mauthner, Maxine Birch, Julie Jessop, and Tina Miller, 14–31. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Rosalind, and Jane Ribbens. 1998. “Living on the Edges: Public Knowledge, Private Lives, Personal Experience.” In Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research, edited by Rosalind Edwards, and Jane Ribbens, 2–23. London: SAGE Publications. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209137.
   Google Scholar
• Feminist Approaches to Youth Sexualities Archive (FAYS). n.d. Accessed October 14 2021. https://archives.reanimatingdata.co.uk/s/fays/.
   Google Scholar
• Flinn, Andrew. 2011. “The Impact of Independent and Community Archives on Professional Archival Thinking and Practice.” In The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader, edited by Jennie Hill, 145–170. London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Flinn, Andrew, Mary Stevens, and Elizabeth Shepherd. 2009. “Whose Memories, Whose Archives? Independent Community Archives, Autonomy and the Mainstream.” Archival Science 9 (1): 71–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2.
   Google Scholar
• Friends Of Clayoquot Sound. n.d. Accessed April 19, 2021. http://focs.ca/.
   Google Scholar
• General Data Protection Regulation. n.d. “Everything you need to know about the ‘Right to be forgotten.’” GDPR.eu. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://gdpr.eu/right-to-be-forgotten/.
   Google Scholar
• Grinyer, Anne. 2002. “Social Research Update 36: The Anonymity of Research Participants.” Social Research Update 36 (1). https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU36.html
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henningham, Nikki, Joanne Evans, and Helen Morgan. 2017. “The Australian Women’s Archives Project: Creating and Co-Curating Community Feminist Archives in a Post-Custodial Age.” Australian Feminist Studies 32 (91-92): 91–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2017.1357015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, Eric. 2012. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” In The Invention of Tradition, Edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Canto Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, Anna Lauren. 2021. “Even When You Are a Solution You Are a Problem: An Uncomfortable Reflection on Feminist Data Ethics.” Global Perspectives 2 (1): 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2021.21335.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Kahryn, and Anna Tarrant. 2020. Qualitative Secondary Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg, Alison. 2009. “Memory, Empathy, and the Politics of Identification.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 22 (2): 221–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9056-x.
   Google Scholar
• Lapp, Jessica. 2020. The Provenance of Protest: Conceptualizing Records Creation in Archives of Feminist Materials. Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto (Canada), https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/provenance-protest-conceptualizing-records/docview/2466327785/se-2?accountid = 10673 (accessed October 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jamie A. 2020. Producing the Archival Body. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jamie A. 2021. “Archives as Spaces of Radical Hospitality.” Australian Feminist Studies, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2021.1969520.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén, Lisa, and Vicky Singleton. 2021. “Unsettling Descriptions: Attending to the Potential of Things That Threaten to Undermine Care.” Qualitative Research 21 (3): 426–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120976919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lury, Celia, and Nina Wakeford. 2013. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mantra. n.d. Mantra: Research Data Management Training. The University of Edinburgh. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://mantra.ed.ac.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, Cait. 2020. Information Activism: A Queer History of Lesbian Media Technologies. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, Julie, and Kate O’Connor. 2020. “Ethics, Archives and Data Sharing in Qualitative Research.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (5): 523–535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1805310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, Julie, and Rachel Thomson. 2009. Researching Social Change: Qualitative Approaches. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh. 2007. “(Re)Using Qualitative Data?” Sociological Research Online 12 (3): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh. 2012. “The Politics and Ethics of Naming: Questioning Anonymisation in (Archival) Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15 (4): 331–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.688330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh. 2015. The Changing Nature of Eco/Feminism: Telling Stories from Clayoquot Sound. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh. 2017. “Weaving Archival Imagines: Researching Community Archives.” In The Archive Project: Archival Research in the Social Sciences, edited by Niamh Moore, Andrea Salter, Liz Stanley, and Maria Tamboukou, 129–152. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh. 2020. “‘Wibbly-Wobbly Timey-Wimey’ LGBT Histories: Community Archives As Boundary Objects.” In Communities, Archives and New Collaborative Practices, edited by Simon Popple, Andrew Prescott, and Daniel Mutibwa, 195–206. Bristol: Policy Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447341895.003.0014.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh, Nikki Dunne, Mary Hanlon, and Martina Karels. forthcoming. DIY Academic Archiving: Sharing Data and Curating Research Materials. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh, Rachel Thomson, and Ester McGeeney. 2021. “Putting Place Back Into the Patriarchy Through Rematriating Feminist Research: The WRAP Project, Feminist Webs and Reanimating Data.” In Temporality and Place in Educational Research: Looking Beyond a Local/Global Binary, edited by McLeod Julie, and Kate O’Connor. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Michelle. 2015. “Unsettling Care: Troubling Transnational Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 717–737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715589136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, Uma. 1995. “Colonialism and Its Others: Considerations on Rights and Care Discourses.” Hypatia 10 (2): 133–140. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810285.
   Google Scholar
• Native Land Digital. n.d. “Nuučaan̓uuɫɁatḥ Nism̓a (Nuu-Chah-Nulth).” Last modified September 2, 2020. https://native-land.ca/maps/territories/nuu-chah-nulth-tribal-council/.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, Melanie. 2014. What Is Inclusive Research? London: Bloomsbury. doi:https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849668149.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, Melanie, Rose Wiles, Andrew Bengry-Howell, and Graham Crow. 2013. “Methodological Innovation and Research Ethics: Forces in Tension or Forces in Harmony?” Qualitative Research 13 (6): 650–667. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112455042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oke, Arike. 2020. “The Civic Archivist.” Filmed November 2020 at London School of Economics Library (online), London. Video, 1:14:39. https://www.lse.ac.uk/library/events/general/the-civic-archivist.
   Google Scholar
• Omeka. n.d. Digital Scholar. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://omeka.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Palmisano, Stefania, and Nicola Pannofino. 2016. “Inventive Traditions: Sacred Creativity in the Spirituality of The Secret.” Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review 7 (1): 3–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/asrr201652519.
   Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Posthumanities, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reanimating Data: Experiments with People, Places and Archives. n.d. Accessed October 14 2021. http://reanimatingdata.co.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Robin. 2014. “Research Data MANTRA: A Labour of Love.” Journal of EScience Librarianship 3 (1). doi:https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2014.1056.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Robin, and John Southall. 2016. The Data Librarian’s Handbook. London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield, Rebecka Taves. 2020. Documenting Rebellions: A Study of Four Lesbian and Gay Archives in Queer Times. Sacramento: Litwin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies:Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Tonia. 2019. “The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment.” Journal of Cultural Analytics 4 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.22148/16.039.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Rachel, and Liam Berriman. 2021. “Starting with the Archive: Principles for Prospective Collaborative Research.” Qualitative Research, 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211023037.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, Sharon D. 2000. A Feminist Ethic of Risk. Minneapolis: Fortress.
   Google Scholar