Comparison of the effect of changing the spatial distance with exposure time to mobile phones radiation on the structure and function of the testis in NMRI mice

References

• Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E, Sharma R. 2009. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril. 92(4):1318–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry SM, Hunt PA, Hassold TJ. 2004. Cisplatin disrupts mam- malian spermatogenesis, but does not affect recombination or chromosome segregation. Mutat Res - Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 564(2):115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Dasdag S, Bilgin HM, Akdag MZ, Celik H, Aksen F. 2008. Effect of long term mobile phone exposure on oxidative-antioxidative processes and nitric oxide in rats. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 22(4):992–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan W, Liu C, Wu H, Chen C, Zhang T, Gao P, Luo X, Yu Z, Zhou Z. 2014. Effects of exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields on spermatogenesis in adult rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 35(1):58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada AJ, Singh A, Agarwal S. 2011. Cell phones and their impact on male fertility: fact or fiction. TORSJ. 3(1):125–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan I, Amin T, Alam MR, Islam MR. 2021. Hematobiochemical and histopathological alterations of kidney and testis due to exposure of 4G cell phone radiation in mice. Saudi J Biol Sci. 28(5):2933–2942.
   Google Scholar
• Houston BJ, Nixon B, King BV, Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. 2018. Probing the origins of 1,800 MHz radio frequency electromagnetic radiation induced damage in mouse immortalized germ cells and spermatozoa in vitro. Front Public Health. 6:270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilacqua A, Izzo G, Emerenziani GP, Baldari C, Aversa A. 2018. Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 16(1):115–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imai N, Kawabe M, Hikage T, Nojima T, Takahashi S, Shirai T. 2011. Effects on rat testis of 1.95-GHz W-CDMA for IMT-2000 cellular phones. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 57(4):204–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari KK, Agarwal A, Henkel R. 2018. Radiations and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 16(1):118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D'Agata R, Calogero AE. 2012. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature. J Androl. 33(3):350–356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luna LG. 1968. Manual of histologic staining methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 3rd Edition. New York: Blakiston Division, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Luzhna L, Kathiria P, Kovalchuk O. 2013. Micronuclei in genotoxicity assessment: from genetics to epigenetics and beyond. Front Genet. 4:131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahmoud NM, Gomaa RS, Salem AE. 2021. Activation of liver X receptors ameliorates alterations in testicular function in rats exposed to electromagnetic radiation. Alexandria J Med. 57(1):82–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan HL, Eid N, Khoshkerdar A, Watkins AJ. 2020. Defining the male contribution to embryo quality and offspring health in assisted reproduction in farm animals. Anim Reprod. 17(3):e20200018.
   Google Scholar
• Mruk DD, Cheng CY. 2004. Sertoli-sertoli and sertoli-germ cell interactions and their significance in germ cell movement in the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev. 25(5):747–806.
   Google Scholar
• Naeem Z. 2014. Health risks associated with mobile phones use. IJHS. 8(4):v–vi.
   Google Scholar
• Oh JJ, Byun S-S, Lee SE, Choe G, Hong SK. 2018. Health risks associated with mobile phones use. BioMed Res Int. 2018:1801798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okechukwu CE. 2020. Does the use of mobile phone affect male fertility? A mini-review. J Hum Reprod Sci. 13(3):174–183.
   Google Scholar
• Ozguner M, Koyu A, Cesur G, Ural M, Ozguner F, Gokcimen A, Delibas N. 2005. Biological and morphological effects on the reproductive organ of rats after exposure to electromagnetic field. Saudi Med J. 26:405–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O, Carlo GL. 2015. Real versus simulated mobile phone exposures in experimental studies. BioMed Res Intl. 2015:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rafique N, Al-Asoom LI, Alsunni AA, Saudagar FN, Almulhim L, Alkaltham G. 2020. Effects of mobile use on subjective sleep quality. Nat Sci Sleep. 12:357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigi Manesh M, Arab M, Sargolzaei Aval F, Mashhadi M, Sargolzaei N, Mir M, Shahraki Salar M. 2018. Cisplatin induce changes of cell surface glycoconjugates in germinal epithelium of seminiferous tubules. ANJ. 15:31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Saad S, Isaac M. 2017. The effect of mobile phone exposure on the testicular structure of the pubertal and the adult male albino rat. EJANA. 40(2):265–278.
   Google Scholar
• Staub C, Johnson L. 2018. Review: Spermatogenesis in the bull. Animal. 12(s1):s27–s35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasan SS. 2011. Semen analysis and sperm function tests: how much to test? Indian J Urol. 27(1):41–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2010. Chapter 2: Collection and examination of human semen. In WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: World Health Organization. p. 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zha XD, Wang WW, Xu S, Shang XJ. 2019. Impacts of electromagnetic radiation from cellphones and Wi-Fi on spermatogenesis. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 25:451–455.
   Google Scholar