530
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Remembering Relevant Information and Withholding Relevant Next Actions: The German Token achja

&
Pages 58-98 | Published online: 29 Feb 2008

REFERENCES

  • Aston , G. 1987 . “ AH: A corpus-based exercise in conversational analysis. ” . In Spoken discourse , Edited by: Morley , J. and Parington , P. A. 123 – 137 . Camerino, , Italy : Univiersita di Camerino. .
  • Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 1984 . Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
  • Auer , P. 1984 . Referential problems in conversation. . Journal of Pragmatics , 8 : 627 – 648 .
  • Auer , P. and Uhmann , S. 1982 . Aspekte der konversationellen Organisation von Bewertungen [Aspects of the conversational organization of assessments]. . Deutsche Sprache , 10 : 1 – 32 .
  • Barske , T. 2006 . Enacting the roles of boss and employee in German business meetings: A conversation analytic study of how social roles are co-constructed. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Betz , E. and Golato , A. German ‘ach’ and ‘achso’ in repair uptake: A resource to sustain or remove epistemic asymmetry. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Annual Conference . April , Costa Mesa, CA
  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2006). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4.24 [Computer program]. Retrieved June 19, 2006, from http://www.praat.org/
  • Bolden , G. 2004 . Delayed and incipient actions: The discourse markers “-to” and “so” in Russian and English conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Bolden , G. 2006 . Little words that matter: Discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. . Journal of Communication , 56 : 661 – 688 .
  • Bredel , U. 2000 . Ach so–Eine Rekonstruktion aus funktional-pragmatischer Perspektive [A reconstruction from a functional-pragmatic perspective]. . Linguistische Berichte , 184 : 401 – 421 .
  • Couper-Kuhlen , E. 1993 . English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. , Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Couper-Kuhlen , E. 1999 . “ Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. ” . In Coherence in spoken and written discourse , Edited by: Bublitz , W. and Lenk , U. 11 – 33 . Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Ford , C. E. 2004 . Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation , Amsterdam : Benjamins. .
  • Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Selting , M. , eds. 1996 . Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies. , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
  • Drew , P. 1989 . “ Recalling someone from the past. ” . In Conversation: An interdisciplinary approach , Edited by: Roger , D. and Bull , P. 96 – 115 . Philadelphia : Multilingual Matters .
  • Egbert , M. M. 1997 . Some interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multiperson conversation. . Journal of Pragmatics , 27 : 611 – 634 .
  • Egbert , M. M. 2002 . Der Reparatur-Mechanismus in deutschen und interkulturellen Gesprächen [The repair mechanism in German and intercultural conversation]. Habilitationsschrift. Universität Oldenburg.
  • Egbert , M. M. 2004 . Other-initiated repair and membership categorization–Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization. . Journal of Pragmatics , 36 : 1467 – 1498 .
  • Ford , C. E. and Couper-Kuhlen , E. 2004 . “ Conversation and phonetics. ” . In Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies from Conversation , Edited by: Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Ford , C. E. 3 – 25 . Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Gardner , R. 1995 . On some uses of the conversational token mm. Melbourne, , Australia Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne
  • Gardner , R. 1997 . The conversation object Mm: A weak and variable acknowledging token. . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 30 : 131 – 156 .
  • Gardner , R. 1998 . Between listening and speaking: The vocalization of understandings. . Applied Linguistics , 19 : 204 – 224 .
  • Gardner , R. 2002 . When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance , Vol. 92 , Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Golato , A. 2002 . “ Self-quotation in German: Reporting on past decisions. ” . In Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains , Edited by: Güldemann , T. and Roncador , v. M. 49 – 70 . Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Golato , A. 2005 . Compliments and compliment responses: Grammatical structure and sequential organization , Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Golato , A. November 2006 . Action and topic shifts in conversation: The case of 3rd-position ‘naja’ in German November , San Antonio, TX Paper presented at the Convention of the National Communication Association
  • Golato , A. and Fagyal , Z. “ Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ja and the role of prosody–A conversation analytic perspective. ” . In Research on Language and Social Interaction. (in press)
  • Golato , A. and Fagyal , Z. Two contours, two meanings: The intonation of jaja in German phone conversations. Speech Prosody, 3rd International Conference Dresden, May 2–5, 2006. Abstract Book and CD-Rom Proceedings. Dresden : TUD press Verlag der Wissenschaft. .
  • Goodwin , C. 1987 . Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. . Social Psychology Quarterly , 50 : 115 – 131 .
  • Günthner , S. 1999 . Polyphony and the “layering of voices” in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. . Journal of Pragmatics , 31 : 685 – 708 .
  • Harren , I. 2001 . “Ne?” in Alltagsgesprächen–interaktive Funktionen und Positionierung in Turn und Sequenz Oldenburg, , Germany [“Ne?” in everyday conversation–Interactive functions and positioning in turns and sequences]. Unpublished master's thesis, Universität Oldenburg
  • Heritage , J. 1984 . “ A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 299 – 345 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press. .
  • Heritage , J. 1998 . Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. . Language in Society , 27 : 291 – 334 .
  • Heritage , J. 2002 . “ Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. ” . In The language of turn and sequence , Edited by: Ford , C. E. , Fox , B. A. and Thompson , S. A. 196 – 224 . Oxford, , England : Oxford University Press. .
  • Heritage , J. 2005 . “ Cognition in discourse. ” . In Conversation and cognition , Edited by: te Molder , H. and Potter , J. 184 – 202 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press. .
  • Heritage , J. and Atkinson , J. M. 1984 . “ Introduction. ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 1 – 15 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press. .
  • Holt , E. and Clift , R. , eds. 2007 . Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
  • Hutchby , I. 2001 . “Oh,” irony and sequential ambiguity in arguments. . Discourse & Society , 12 : 123 – 141 .
  • James , D. 1972 . Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of interjections. . Chicago Linguistic Society , 8 : 162 – 172 .
  • James , D. 1974 . Another look at, say, some grammatical constraints on, oh, interjections and hesitations. . Chicago Linguistic Society , 10 : 242 – 251 .
  • Jefferson , G. 1978 . “ Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. ” . In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction , Edited by: Schenkein , J. 219 – 248 . New York : Academic .
  • Jefferson , G. 1980a . “ The abominable Ne?: An Exploration of post-response pursuit of response. ” . In Dialogforschung: Jahrbuch 1980 des Instituts für deutsche Sprache , Edited by: Schröder , P. and Steger , H. 53 – 88 . Düsseldorf, , Germany : Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann .
  • Jefferson , G. 1980b . On “trouble-premonitory” response to inquiry. . Sociological Inquiry , 50 ( 3–4 ) : 153 – 185 .
  • Jefferson , G. 1984 . Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “yeah” and “Mm hm.” . Papers in Linguistics , 17 : 197 – 216 .
  • Kelly , J. and Local , J. 1989 . Doing phonology: Observing, recording, interpreting. , Manchester, , England : Manchester University Press .
  • Klewitz , G. and Couper-Kuhlen , E. 1999 . Quote-unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. . Pragmatics , 9 : 459 – 485 .
  • Koshik , I. 2005 . Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction , Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Lindström , A. 1999 . “ Language as social action: Grammar, prosody and interaction in Swedish conversation. Vol. ” . In [Skrifter utgivna av institutionen för nordiska språk vid Uppsala universitet, 46.] Uppsala, , Sweden Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University
  • Local , J. 1996 . “ Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. ” . In Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies , Edited by: Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Selting , M. 177 – 230 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press. .
  • Lynch , M. 1982 . Closure and disclosure in pre-trial argument. . Human Studies , 5 : 285 – 318 .
  • Maynard , D. W. 1997 . The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 20 : 93 – 130 .
  • Middleton , D. 1997 . Conversational remembering and uncertainty: Interdependencies of experience as individual and collective concerns in teamwork. . Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 16 : 389 – 410 .
  • Middleton , D. 2002 . Succession and change in the sociocultural use of memory: Building-in the past in communicative action. . Culture and Psychology , 8 ( 1 ) : 79 – 95 .
  • Mori , J. 2006 . The workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences: An analysis of sequential context, turn shape, and prosody. . Journal of Pragmatics , 38 : 1175 – 1205 .
  • Müller , F. E. 1996 . “ Affiliating and disaffiliating with continuers: Prosodic aspects of recipiency. ” . In Prosody in conversation , Edited by: Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Selting , M. 131 – 176 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press. .
  • Pomerantz , A. 1984a . “ Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 225 – 246 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press. .
  • Pomerantz , A. 1984b . “ Pursuing a response. ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 152 – 164 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press. .
  • Reavey , P. and Brown , S. D. 2006 . Transforming past agency and action in the present: Time, social remembering and child sex abuse. . Theory and Psychology , 16 : 179 – 202 .
  • Rönfeldt , B. and Auer , P. 2002 . “ Erinnern und Vergessen. Erschwerte Wortfindung als soziales und interaktives problem. ” . In Wortfindung und Wortfindungsstörungen , Edited by: Schecker , M. 77 – 108 . Tübingen, , Germany : Narr . [Lexical access and impairment of lexical access]
  • Schegloff , E. A. 1982 . “ Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. ” . In Analyzing discourse: Text and talk , Edited by: Tannen , D. 71 – 93 . Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press . (Georgetown University on Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics).
  • Schegloff , E. A. 1984 . “ On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 28 – 52 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
  • Schegloff , E. A. 1987 . Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. . Social Psychology Quarterly , 50 : 101 – 114 .
  • Schegloff , E. A. 1992 . Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. . American Journal of Sociology , 97 : 1295 – 1345 .
  • Schegloff , E. A. 1993 . Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 26 : 99 – 128 .
  • Schegloff , E. A. 1996 . “ Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. ” . In Interaction and grammar , Edited by: Ochs , E. , Schegloff , E. A. and Thompson , S. A. 52 – 133 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press. .
  • Schegloff , E. A. 1998 . Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. . Language and Speech , 41 : 235 – 263 .
  • Schegloff , E. A. , Jefferson , G. and Sacks , H. 1977 . The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. . Language , 53 : 361 – 382 .
  • Schiffrin , D. 1987 . Discourse markers. , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
  • Selting , M. 1988 . The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling sequences in conversation. . Journal of Pragmatics , 12 : 293 – 322 .
  • Selting , M. 1995 . Prosodie im Gespräch , Tübingen, , Germany : Niemeyer . [Prosody in conversation].
  • Selting , M. 1998 . TCUs and TRPs: The construction of “units” in conversational talk. . Interaction and Linguistic Structures , 4 : 1 – 48 .
  • Selting , M. Lists: The prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis . May , Copenhagen, , Denmark
  • Sorjonen , M.-L. 2001 . Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish , Vol. 70 , Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Stivers , T. 2004 . “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. . Human Communication Research , 30 : 260 – 293 .
  • Taleghani-Nikazm , C. 2006 . Request sequences: The intersection of grammar, interaction and social context , Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Willkop , E.-M. 1988 . Gliederungspartikeln im Dialog , München, , Germany : Iudicium . [Structuring particles in dialogues].
  • Wu , R.-J. R. 2004 . Stance in talk: A conversation analysis of Mandarin final particles , Amsterdam : Benjamins .
  • Zifonun , G. , Hoffmann , L. and Strecker , B. 1997 . Grammatik der deutschen Sprache (3 Bände [Grammar of the German language]). , Berlin : de Gruyter .
  • Zimmerman , D. H. 1993 . Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency revisited. . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 26 : 179 – 194 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.