Good Enough: Low-Grade Assessments in Caregiving Situations

REFERENCES

• Antaki , C. 2002 . “Lovely”: Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings. . Discourse Studies , 4 : 5 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Antaki , C. , Houtkoop-Steenstra , H. and Rapley , M. 2000 . “Brilliant. Next question-”: High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 33 : 235 – 262 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilmes , J. 1988 . The concept of preference in conversation analysis. . Language in Society , 17 : 161 – 181 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golato , A. 2004 . Compliments and compliment responses. Amsterdam/Philadelphia : Benjamins. .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , C. and Goodwin , M. 1992 . “ Assessments and the construction of context. ” . In Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon Edited by: Duranti , A. and Goodwin , C. 147 – 190 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann , T. 2006 . “Will you or can-t you?”: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. . Journal of Pragmatics , 38 : 1081 – 1104 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann , T. 2009 . Managing unavoidable conflicts in caretaking of the elderly: Humor as a mitigating resource. . International Journal of the Sociology of Language , 200 : 103 – 127 .
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann , T. and Lindström , A. May 2006 . “ Exiting an interactional task with assessments ” . In International Conference on Conversation Analysis May , Helsinki, , Finland
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann , T. and Lindström , A. July 2007 . “ Particles, pursuits, and preference organization ” . In International Pragmatics Association Conference July , Göteborg
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 2002 . “ Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement ” . In The language of turn and sequence Edited by: Ford , C. , Fox , B. and Thompson , S. 196 – 224 . New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. 2008 . “ Conversation analysis as social theory. ” . In The new Blackwell companion to social theory Edited by: Turner , B. 300 – 320 . Oxford, , UK : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Heritage , J. and Raymond , G. 2005 . The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. . Social Psychology Quarterly , 68 : 15 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson , G. 1993 . Caveat speaker: Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature. . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 26 : 1 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Lindström , A. 1994 . Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings. . Language in Society , 23 : 231 – 252 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström , A. 1997 . Designing social actions: Grammar, prosody, and interaction in Swedish conversation Los Angeles : University of California . Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Lindström , A. 1999 . Language as social action: Grammar, prosody and interaction in Swedish conversation. (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk, Uppsala universitet 46.) University of Uppsala . Doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Lindström , A. 2005 . “ Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. ” . In Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Edited by: Hakulinen , A. and Selting , M. 209 – 230 . Amsterdam/Philadelphia : Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Ogden , R. 2006 . Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. . Journal of Pragmatics , 38 : 1752 – 1775 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet-Shore , D. 2003 . Doing “okay”: On the multiple metrics of an assessment. . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 36 : 285 – 319 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1984 . “ Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. ” . In Structures of social action Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 57 – 101 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Raymond , G. 2003 . Grammar and social organization: Yes/No type interrogatives and the structure of responding. . American Sociological Review , 68 : 939 – 967 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond , G. and Heritage , J. 2006 . The epistemics of social relationships: Owning grandchildren. . Language in Society , 35 : 677 – 705 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 1998 . Body torque. . Social Research , 65 : 535 – 596 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. and Rossano , F. , eds. “ Mobilizing response ” . In Research on Language and Social Interaction (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Svennevig , J. 2001 . “ Ja, jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegian ” . In Modalität und mehr/Modality and more Edited by: Vater , H. and Letnes , O. 143 – 165 . Trier, , Germany : Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier .
   Google Scholar
• Vikør , L. S. 1993 . The Nordic languages: Their status and interrelations. , Publication no. 14 Oslo, , Norway : Nordic Language Secretariat .
   Google Scholar