How to Propose an Action as Objectively Necessary: The Case of Polish Trzeba x (“One Needs to x”)

REFERENCES

• Betz , E. and Golato , A. 2008 . Remembering relevant information and withholding relevant next actions: The German token “achja.” . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 41 : 58 – 98 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, B., Comrie, B., & Haspelmath, M. (2008). The Leipzig glossing rules. Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php (http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php)
   Google Scholar
• Blum-Kulka , S. , House , J. and Kasper , G. , eds. 1989 . Cross-cultural pragmatics , Norwood, NJ : Ablex .
   Google Scholar
• Blum-Kulka , S. and Olshtain , E. 1984 . Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP) . Applied Linguistics , 5 : 196 – 213 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borek , A. Is “ja” necessarily redundant? The use of free-standing first person pronoun in Polish . Paper presented at the Conference on Everyday Interaction across Cultures . Portsmouth, UK. September .
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Ford , C. E. 2004 . Sound patterns in interaction. Cross-linguistic studies from conversation , Amsterdam, , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Craven , A. and Potter , J. 2010 . Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action . Discourse Studies , 12 : 419 – 442 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl , T. S. and Drew , P. 2008 . Contingency and action. A comparison of two forms of requesting . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 41 : 129 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert , M. and Vöge , M. 2008 . Wh-interrogative formats used for questioning and beyond: German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English why . Discourse Studies , 10 : 17 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Enfield , N. J. and Stivers , T. , eds. 2007 . Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives , Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Enfield , N. J. , Stivers , T. and Levinson , S. C. 2010 . Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction . Journal of Pragmatics , 42 : 2615 – 2619 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox , B. A. , Hayashi , M. and Jasperson , R. 1996 . “ Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair ” . In Interaction and grammar , Edited by: Ochs , E. , Schegloff , E. A. and Thompson , S. A. 185 – 237 . Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , C. 2000 . Action and embodiment within situated human interaction . Journal of Pragmatics , 32 : 1489 – 1522 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin , C. 2002 . Time in action . Current Anthropology , 43 : S19 – S35 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin , M. H. 1990 . He-said-she-said. Talk as social organization among black children , Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN : Indiana University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , M. H. 2006 . Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences . Text & Talk , 26 : 513 – 541 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakulinen , A. and Selting , M. , eds. 2005 . Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction , Amsterdam, , The Netherlands & Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Hansen , B. 2000 . The German modal verb müssen and the Slavonic languages—The reconstruction of a success story . Scando-Slavica , 46 : 77 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi , M. 2003 . Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation , Amsterdam, , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Hockett , C. F. 1954 . “ Chinese versus English: An exploration of the Whorfian theses ” . In Language in culture. Conference on the interrelations of language and other aspects of culture , Edited by: Hoijer , H. 106 – 123 . Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik , L. 2010 . Marking boundaries between activities: The particle nii in Estonian . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 43 : 157 – 182 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner , G. H. 1996 . Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction . Social Psychology Quarterly , 59 : 303 – 321 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner , G. H. 2003 . Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization . Language in Society , 32 : 177 – 201 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner , G. H. and Kitzinger , C. 2007 . Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference . Discourse Studies , 9 : 526 – 557 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson , S. C. 1983 . Pragmatics , Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lindström , A. 2005 . “ Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service ” . In Syntax and lexis in conversation , Edited by: Hakulinen , A. and Selting , M. 209 – 233 . Amsterdam, , The Netherlands : Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Lindström , A. 2009 . “ Projecting nonalignment in conversation ” . In Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives , Edited by: Sidnell , J. 135 – 158 . Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Nuyts , J. , Byloo , P. and Diepeveen , J. 2010 . On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten . Journal of Pragmatics , 42 : 16 – 34 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs , E. , Schegloff , E. A. and Thompson , S. A. , eds. 1996 . Interaction and grammar , Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ogiermann , E. 2009 . Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests . Journal of Politeness Research , 5 : 189 – 216 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh , S.-Y. 2005 . English zero anaphora as an interactional resource . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 38 : 267 – 302 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh , S.-Y. 2007 . Overt reference to speaker and recipient in Korean . Discourse Studies , 9 : 462 – 492 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park , Y. 2009 . Interaction between grammar and multimodal resources: Quoting different characters in Korean multiparty conversation . Discourse Studies , 11 : 79 – 104 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1980 . Telling my side: “limited access” as a fishing device . Sociological Inquiry , 50 : 186 – 198 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz , A. 1984 . “ Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes ” . In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis , Edited by: Atkinson , J. M. and Heritage , J. 57 – 101 . Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Raymond , G. 2003 . Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding . American Sociological Review , 68 : 939 – 967 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossano , F. , Brown , P. and Levinson , S. C. 2009 . “ Gaze, questioning, and culture ” . In Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives , Edited by: Sidnell , J. 187 – 249 . Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sacks , H. , Schegloff , E. A. and Jefferson , G. 1974 . A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation . Language , 50 : 696 – 735 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 1995 . Discourse as interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 28 : 185 – 211 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 1996 . “ Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction ” . In Interaction and grammar , Edited by: Ochs , E. , Schegloff , E. A. and Thompson , S. A. 52 – 133 . Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 2007 . Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis , Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 2009 . “ One perspective on Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives ” . In Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives , Edited by: Sidnell , J. 357 – 406 . Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Selting , M. and Couper-Kuhlen , E. , eds. 2001 . Studies in interactional linguistics , Amsterdam, , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell , J. 2007 . Comparative studies in conversation analysis . Annual Review of Anthropology , 36 : 229 – 244 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell , J. 2009a . “ Comparative perspectives in conversation analysis ” . In Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives , Edited by: Sidnell , J. 3 – 27 . Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell , J. 2009b . “ Language-specific resources in repair and assessments ” . In Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives , Edited by: Sidnell , J. 304 – 325 . Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell , J. , ed. 2009c . Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives , Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell , J. and Enfield , N. J. in press . Language diversity and social action: A third locus of linguistic relativity . Current Anthropology ,
   Google Scholar
• Sorjonen , M.-L. 1996 . “ On repeats and responses in Finnish conversations ” . In Interaction and grammar , Edited by: Ochs , E. , Schegloff , E. A. and Thompson , S. A. 277 – 327 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. 2004 . “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction . Human Communication Research , 30 : 260 – 293 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. 2008 . Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 41 : 31 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. and Rossano , F. 2010 . Mobilizing response . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 43 : 3 – 31 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers , T. and Sidnell , J. 2005 . Introduction: Multi-modal interaction . Semiotica , 156 : 1 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck , J. 2009 . Gesturecraft: The manufacture of meaning , Amsterdam, , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka , H. 1999 . Turn-taking in Japanese conversation , Amsterdam, , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka , H. 2000 . Turn projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 33 : 1 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka , H. 2005 . Grammar and the “timing” of social action: Word order and preference organization in Japanese . Language in Society , 34 : 389 – 430 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar