References
- Antaki , C. 2008 . “ Formulations in psychotherapy ” . In Conversation analysis and psychotherapy , Edited by: Peräkylä , A. , Antaki , C. , Vehviläinen , S. and Leudar , I. 26 – 42 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
- Antaki , C. , Barnes , R. and Leudar , I. 2005 . Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy . Discourse Studies , 7 : 627 – 647 .
- Arminen , I. 2009 . “ On comparative methodology in studies of social interaction ” . In Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions , Edited by: Haakana , M. , Laakso , M. and Lindström , J. 48 – 69 . Helsinki , Finland : Finnish Literature Society .
- Beck , A. , Rush , J. , Shaw , B. and Emery , G. 1979 . Cognitive therapy of depression , New York , NY : Guilford .
- Bercelli , F. , Rossano , F. and Viaro , M. 2008 . “ Clients’ responses to therapists’ re-interpretations ” . In Conversation analysis and psychotherapy , Edited by: Peräkylä , A. , Antaki , C. , Vehviläinen , S. and Leudar , I. 43 – 62 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
- Clift , R. 2001 . Meaning in interaction: The case of “actually.” . Language , 77 : 245 – 291 .
- Davis , K. 1986 . The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy . Sociology of Health & Illness , 8 : 44 – 74 .
- Drew , P. 2003 . “ Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch ” . In Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper , Edited by: Glenn , P. J. , LeBaron , C. D. and Mandelbaum , J. 293 – 308 . Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum .
- Elliot , R. , Stiles , W. , Marer , A. , Hill , C. E. , Friedlander , M. L. and Margison , F. R. 1987 . Primary therapist response modes: Comparison of six rating systems . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 55 : 218 – 223 .
- Fonagy , P. , Gergely , G. , Jurist , E. L. and Target , M. 2002 . Affect regulation, metallization and the development of the self , New York , NY : Other Press .
- Greenberg , L. 1997 . Working with emotions in psychotherapy , New York , NY : Guilford .
- Greenson , R. 1967 . The technique and practice of psychoanalysis , London , , England : Hogarth .
- Guidano , V. 1991 . The self in progress: Towards a post-rationalistic cognitive therapy , New York , NY : Guilford .
- Haakana , M. , Laakso , M. and Lindström , J. 2009 . “ Introduction: Comparative dimensions of talk in interaction ” . In Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions , Edited by: Haakana , M. , Laakso , M. and Lindström , J. 15 – 47 . Helsinki , Finland : Finnish Literature Society .
- Hak , T. and De Boer , F. 1996 . Formulations in first encounters . Journal of Pragmatic , 25 : 83 – 99 .
- Heritage , J. and Watson , R. 1979 . “ Formulations as conversational objects ” . In Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology , Edited by: Psathas , G. 123 – 162 . New York , NY : Irvington .
- Horvath , A. O. 2001 . The alliance . Psychotherapy , 4 : 365 – 372 .
- Hutchby , I. 1996 . Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show . Discourse & Society , 4 : 481 – 497 .
- Hutchby , I. 2005 . Active listening: Formulations and the elicitation of feeling-talk in child counseling . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 3 : 303 – 329 .
- Kondratyuk , N. and Peräkylä , A. 2011 . Therapeutic work with the present moment: A conversation analytical study of guidance into immediacy . Psychotherapy Research , 3 : 316 – 330 .
- Lambert , M. J. and Barley , D. E. 2001 . Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome . Psychotherapy , 4 : 357 – 361 .
- Peräkylä , A. 2004 . Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: A conversation analytic view . Psychotherapy Research , 14 : 289 – 307 .
- Peräkylä , A. 2005 . Patients’ responses to interpretations: A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory . Communication & Medicine , 2 : 163 – 176 .
- Peräkylä , A. 2011a . After interpretation: Third position utterances in psychoanalysis . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 3 : 288 – 316 .
- Peräkylä , A. 2011b . “ Validity in research on naturally occurring social interaction ” . In Qualitative research , 3rd , Edited by: Silverman , D. 365 – 382 . London , , England : Sage .
- Peräkylä , A. 2012 . “ Conversation analysis in psychotherapy ” . In Handbook of conversation analysis , Edited by: Stivers , T. and Sidnell , J. 551 – 574 . Chichester , , England : Blackwell .
- Peräkylä , A. , Antaki , C. , Vehviläinen , S. and Leudar , I. 2008 . Conversation analysis and psychotherapy , Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
- Peräkylä , A. , Ruusuvuori , J. and Vehviläinen , S. 2005 . Introduction: Professional theories and institutional interaction . Communication & Medicine , 2 : 105 – 109 .
- Peräkylä , A. and Vehviläinen , S. 2003 . Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge . Discourse & Society , 6 : 727 – 750 .
- Pomeranz , A. 1986 . Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims . Human Studies , 9 : 219 – 229 .
- Potter , J. and Hepburn , A. 2010 . Putting aspiration into words: “Laugh particles,” managing descriptive trouble and modulating action . Journal of Pragmatics , 42 : 1543 – 1555 .
- Sacks , H. , Schegloff , E. A. and Jefferson , G. 1974 . A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation . Language , 50 : 696 – 735 .
- Safran , J. 1998 . Widening the scope of cognitive therapy: The therapeutic emotion and the process of change , London , , England : Jason Aronson .
- Sandler , J. 1994 . The past unconscious and the present unconscious: A contribution to a technical frame of reference . The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child , 49 : 278 – 292 .
- Schegloff , E. A. 1993 . Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 26 : 99 – 128 .
- Sorjonen , M.-L. 2001 . Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish , Amsterdam , , The Netherlands : John Benjamins .
- Stiles , W. , Shapiro , D. and Firth-Conzens , J. 1988 . Verbal response mode use in contrasting psychotherapies: A within-subjects comparison . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 56 : 727 – 733 .
- Vehviläinen , S. 2003 . Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction . Text , 23 : 573 – 606 .
- Vehviläinen , S. , Peräkylä , A. , Antaki , C. and Leudar , I. 2008 . “ A review of conversation practices in psychotherapy ” . In Conversation analysis and psychotherapy , Edited by: Peräkylä , A. , Antaki , C. , Vehviläinen , S. and Leudar , I. 188 – 197 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
- Voutilainen , L. , Peräkylä , A. and Ruusuvuori , J. 2010 . Recognition and interpretation: Responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 43 : 85 – 107 .
- Wampold , B. E. 2001 . The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings , Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
- Watzke , B. , Rueddel , H. , Koch , U. , Rudolph , M. and Schultz , H. 2008 . Comparison of therapeutic action, style and content in cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic group therapy under clinically representative conditions . Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy , 15 : 404 – 417 .
- Wills , F. and Sanders , D. 1997 . Cognitive therapy: Transforming the image , London , , England : Sage .