The Independence of Phonetic Form and Interactional Accomplishments

REFERENCES

• Auer , P. (2014/this issue). There's no harm in glossing (but a need for a better understanding of the status of transcripts) . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 47 ( 1 ) 17 – 22 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin , T. M. 2013 . Signalling trouble: On the linguistic design of other-initiation of repair in English conversation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) , Gronigen , The Netherlands : University of Groningen .
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin , T. M. and Walker , T. 2013 . Managing problems of acceptability through high rise-fall repetitions . Discourse Processes , 50 ( 2 ) : 107 – 138 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl , T. , Local , J. and Walker , G. 2006 . Repetition and the prosody-pragmatics interface . Journal of Pragmatics , 38 : 1721 – 1751 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasperson , R. 2002 . “ Some lingustic aspects of closure cut-off ” . In The language of turn and sequence , Edited by: Ford , C. , Fox , B. and Thompson , S. 257 – 287 . Oxford , England : Oxford University Press . InEds.pp
   Google Scholar
• Kelly , J. and Local , J. 1989 . Doing phonology , Manchester , , England : Manchester University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Local , J. 1996 . “ Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk ” . In Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies , Edited by: Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Selting , M. 177 – 231 . Cambridge , England : Cambridge University Press . InEds.pp
   Google Scholar
• Local , J. and Walker , G. 2008 . Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources . Text and Talk , 28 ( 6 ) : 723 – 747 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local , J. , Wells , B. and Sebba , M. 1985 . Phonology for conversation: Phonetic aspects of turn-delimitation in London Jamaican . Journal of Pragmatics , 9 : 309 – 330 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden , R. and Walker , T. 2013 . “ Social and linguistic units in the construction of activity ” . In Units of talk—Units of action , Edited by: Szczepek-Reed , B. and Raymond , G. 277 – 312 . Amsterdam : The Netherlands: John Benjamins . InEds.pp
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. A. 1997 . Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair . Discourse Processes , 23 : 499 – 545 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting , M. 1996 . “ Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called “astonished” questions in repair ” . In Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies , Edited by: Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Selting , M. 231 – 271 . Cambridge , England : Cambridge University Press . InEds.pp
   Google Scholar
• Walker , T. (2014/this issue). Form ≠ function: The independence of prosody and action . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 47 ( 1 ) 1 – 16 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson , S. and Kitzinger , C. 2006 . Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation . Social Psychology Quarterly , 69 : 150 – 182 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar