Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair: Solving Complex Trouble in Conversation

References

• Aaltonen, T., & Laakso, M. (2010). Halting aphasic interaction: Creation of intersubjectivity and spousal relationship in situ. Communication & Medicine, 7, 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. (2013). Proper noun anomia in conversation: A description of how a man with chronic anomia constructed referencing turns. Aphasiology, 27, 1–19. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.671928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. (2014). Managing intersubjectivity in aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 130–150. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., Candlin, C. N., & Ferguson, A. (2013). Aphasia and topic initiation in conversation: A case study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 102–114. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00186.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Ferguson, A. (2015). Conversation partner responses to problematic talk produced by people with aphasia: Some alternatives to initiating, completing, or pursuing repair. Aphasiology, 29, 315–336. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.874547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W. (2015). Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29, 355–377. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.881459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2007). Individual variation in agrammatism: A single case study of the influence of interaction. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42, 629–647. doi:10.1080/13682820601160087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in acquired speech disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 38–55). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, J. (2013). Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language, 89, 883–919. doi:10.1353/lan.2013.0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. (2012). Across languages and cultures: Brokering problems of understanding in conversational repair. Language in Society, 41, 97–121. doi:10.1017/S0047404511000923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. (2013). Unpacking “self”: Repair and epistemics in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76, 314–342. doi:10.1177/0190272513498398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1985). Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies, 8, 3–55. doi:10.1007/BF00143022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ono, T. (2007). “Incrementing” practices in conversation: A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics, 17, 513–552. doi:10.1075/prag.17.4.02cou
   Google Scholar
• Difrancesco, S., Pulvermüller, F., & Mohr, B. (2012). Intensive language-action therapy (ILAT): The methods. Aphasiology, 26, 1317–1351. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.705815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Blythe, J., & Dirksmeyer, T. (2014). Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in pragmatic typology. Studies in Language, 38, 5–43. doi:10.1075/sl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F., & Enfield, N. J. (2013). Is “Huh?” a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS ONE, 8, 1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). “Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., Dingemanse, M., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Brown, P., Dirksmeyer, T., … Torreira, F. (2013). Huh? What?—a first survey in twenty-one languages. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 343–380). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 14–38). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Oxford, England: Rowman & Littefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., & Hayano, K. (2013). Proffering insertable elements: A study of other-initiated repair in Japanese. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 293–321). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: On the role of so-called “telegraphic style” in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13, 365–405. doi:10.1080/026870399402145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (pp. 255–280). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2013). Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies, 15, 551–578. doi:10.1177/1461445613501449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2015). Collaborative participation in aphasic word searching: Comparison between significant others and speech and language therapists. Aphasiology, 29, 269–290. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.878450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the “hint and guess” sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13, 345–363. doi:10.1080/026870399402136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177–201. doi:10.1017/S004740450332202X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2007). Optimizing person reference—perspectives from usage on Rossel Island. In N. J. Enfield, T. Stivers, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, C., Campbell, K., Davey, A., Rodgers, L., Seipolt, C., & Akins, C. (2010). Some prosodic characteristics of repeated talk following conversation repair requests by adults with hearing impairment. Seminars in Hearing, 31, 127–139. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1252102
   Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Damico, J. S. (2000). Partnership in conversation: A study of word search strategies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 205–225. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00019-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967. doi:10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2006). Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs, 73, 137–161. doi:10.1080/03637750600581206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2014). What “what?” tells us about how conversationalists manage intersubjectivity. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 109–129. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D., & Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2014, June). Making arrangements and the accountability of action. Paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis (ICCA-14), Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiter, M. B., Kolk, H. H. J., & Rietveld, T. C. M. (2010). Speaking in ellipses: The effect of a compensatory style of speech on functional communication in chronic agrammatism. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20, 423–458. doi:10.1080/09602010903399287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 101–114. doi:10.2307/2786745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345. doi:10.1086/229903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. The American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161–216. doi:10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 715–720. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2004). On dispensability. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 37, 95–149. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). London, England: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, M.-S., & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2219–2239. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2008). Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 333–348. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesak, J., & Code, C. (2008). Milestones in the history of aphasia: Theories and protagonists. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2007). Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 542–569. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2014). Intervening with conversation analysis in speech and language therapy: Improving aphasic conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 219–238. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2010). Formulating actions and events with limited linguistic resources: Enactment and iconicity in agrammatic aphasic talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43, 57–84. doi:10.1080/08351810903471506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Gower, M., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2007). Adapting to conversation as a language-impaired speaker: Changes in aphasic turn construction over time. Communication & Medicine, 4, 79–97.
   Google Scholar