Sequentiality, Mutual Visibility, and Behavioral Matching: Body Sway and Pitch Register During Joint Decision Making

References

• Beebe, B., & Lachman, F. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belen’kii, V. Y., Gurfinkel, V. S., & Pal’tsev, Y. I. (1967). Elements of control of voluntary movement. Biophysics, 12, 154–161.
   Google Scholar
• Beňuš, Š. (2014). Social aspects of entrainment in spoken interaction. Cognitive Computation, 6(4), 802–813. doi:10.1007/s12559-014-9261-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13–B25. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J., & Planalp, S. (1981). Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations III: Interspeaker influence. Human Communications Research, 7(2), 117–132. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T., & Bargh, J. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, B., & Schönle, P. (1979). Speech and respiration. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 226(4), 251–268. doi:10.1007/BF00342238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition. On quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 366–405). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Prosody and sequence organization: The case of new beginnings. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation (pp. 335–376). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dault, M. C., Yardley, L., & Frank, J. S. (2003). Does articulation contribute to modifications of postural control during dual-task performance? Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 434–440. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00058-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., Peräkylä, A., & Stevanovic, M. (2016). The co-creation of meaningful action: Bridging enaction and interactional sociology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1693), 20150378. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Looze, C., Oerte, C., Rauzy, S., & Campbell, N. (2011). Measuring dynamics of mimicry by means of prosodic cues in conversational speech. In W. S. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 17–21 August, 2011, Hong Kong (pp. 1294–1297). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, A. G. (1966). Functional tuning of the nervous system during control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture: III. Mechanographic analysis of the execution by man of the simplest motor tasks. Biophysics, 11, 766–775.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465–486. doi:10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2012). Carving language for social coordination: A dynamical approach. Interaction Studies, 13(1), 103–124. doi:10.1075/is.13.1.07fus
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27(2), 181–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90018-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (Eds.). (1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 13–48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975). Speech styles and social evaluation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. A. (2004). The amplitude shift mechanism in conversational closing sequences. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 257–297). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, R., Bone, D., Lee, S., & Narayanan, S. (2016). Analysis of engagement behavior in children during dyadic interactions using prosodic cues. Computer Speech & Language, 37, 47–66. doi:10.1016/j.csl.2015.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hari, R., Himberg, T., Nummenmaa, L., Hämäläinen, M., & Parkkonen, L. (2013). Synchrony of brains and bodies during implicit interpersonal interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(3), 105–106. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himberg, T., Hirvenkari, L., Mandel, A., & Hari, R. (2015). Word-by-word entrainment of speech rhythm during joint story building. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 797. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himberg, T., & Thompson, M. R. (2011). Learning and synchronising dance movements in South African songs—Cross-cultural motion-capture study. Dance Research, 29(2), 303–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtkoop, H. (1987). Establishing agreement: An analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivonen, A. (1998). Intonation in Finnish. In D. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages (pp. 322–338). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, B. Y. (1991). Respiration effect on standing balance. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72(9), 642–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbara, I. (2006). On gestural mimicry. Gesture, 6(1), 39–61. doi:10.1075/gest.6.1
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P., & McKinney, N. P. (1963). Loudness, sound pressure, and subglottal pressure in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35(4), 454–460. doi:10.1121/1.1918503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFrance, M. (1982). Posture mirroring and rapport. In M. Davis (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp. 279–298). New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lennes, M., Stevanovic, M., Aalto, D., & Palo, P. (2015). Comparing pitch distributions using Praat and R. Phonetician, 111–112, 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2014). Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 67, 34–60. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404–1426. doi:10.1111/cogs.2012.36.issue-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist, L. O., & Dimberg, A. (1995). Facial expressions are contagious. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 203–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, J. H., Bryant, G. A., Gervais, M. M., & Kline, M. A. (2013). Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 419–426. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, L. K., Griffiths, J. L., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). Too late to coordinate: Contextual influences on behavioral synchrony. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117–129. doi:10.1177/1461445606059561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale, M. (1975). Social desirability as related to convergence of temporal speech patterns. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40(3), 827–830. doi:10.2466/pms.1975.40.3.827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, J. G., Wayand, J., & Kramer, G. (2002). Pitch and loudness interact in auditory displays: Can the data get lost in the map? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(1), 17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2006). Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1752–1775. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013). Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 329–343. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0249-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, W., & Street, R. L. (1984). The conception and perception of noncontent speech performance: Implications for speech accommodation theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2008). Synchrony in dyadic psychotherapy sessions. In S. Vrobel, O. E. Roessler, & T. Marks-Tarlow (Eds.), Simultaneity: Temporal structures and observer perspectives (pp. 329–347). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045–1060. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D., Dale, R., & Shockley, K. (2008). Synchrony and swing in conversation: Coordination, temporal dynamics and communication. In I. Wachsmuth, M. Lenzen, & G. Knoblich (Eds.), Embodied communication in humans and machines (pp. 75–93). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmer, K. P., Ford, G. T., & Whitelaw, W. A. (1995). Interaction between postural and respiratory control of human intercostals muscles. Journal of Applied Physiology, 79(5), 1556–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction (PhD dissertation). Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40(1), 227–256. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00084-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, K., Baker, A. A., Richardson, M. J., & Fowler, C. A. (2007). Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 305–319. doi:10.1111/tops.2009.1.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2012a). Establishing joint decisions in a dyad. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 779–803. doi:10.1177/1461445612456654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2012b). Prosodic salience and the emergence of new decisions: On the prosody of approval in Finnish workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6), 843–862. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2013). Deontic rights in interaction: A conversation analytic study on authority and cooperation (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Kahri, M. (2011). Puheäänen musiikilliset piirteet ja sosiaalinen toiminta [Social action and the musical aspects of speech]. Sosiologia, 48, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose and decide. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. doi:10.1080/08351810903471258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A., Pagulayan, R. J., Bardy, B. G., & Hettinger, L. J. (2000). Modulating postural control to facilitate visual performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(2), 203–220.
   Google Scholar
• Street, R. L. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11(2), 139–169. doi:10.1111/hcre.1984.11.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2006). Prosodic orientation in English conversations. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2009). Prosodic orientation: A practice for sequence organization in broadcast telephone openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1223–1247. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 693–695. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waaramaa, T., Laukkanen, A.-M., Airas, M., & Alku, P. (2010). Perception of emotional valences and activity levels from vowel segments of continuous speech. Journal of Voice, 24(1), 30–38. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, L., Gardner, M., Leadbetter, A., & Lavie, N. (1999). Effect of articulation and mental tasks on postural control. Neuroreport, 10(2), 215–219. doi:10.1097/00001756-199902050-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar