Flirting: A Designedly Ambiguous Action?

References

• Bernarte, R. P., Alday, J. R. I., Calajatan, E. M. O., Fraginal, J. A. F., & Lauchengco, C. A. L. (2015). Decoding the art of flirting: The techniques used by gays and lesbians in the Philippines. European Academic Research, 2(11), 14180–14196.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25(1), 219–253. doi:10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2003). Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch. In P. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 293–308). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2005). Conversation analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 71-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. (2002). Legal institutions, nonspeaking recipiency and participants’ orientations. Discourse & Society, 13(6), 731–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugère, M. A., Leszczynski, J. P., & Cousins, A. J. (2014). The social psychology of attraction and romantic relationships. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Givens, D. (1978). The nonverbal basis of attraction: Flirtation, courtship, and seduction. Psychiatry, 41, 346–359. doi:10.1080/00332747.1978.11023994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, P., & Holt, E. (Eds.). (2013). Studies of laughter in interaction. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: An examination of miscommunication in flirting interactions. Sex Roles, 50(7–8), 481–489. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023068.49352.4b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper, R. (2003). Gendering talk. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hudak, P. L., Gill, V. T., Aguinaldo, J. P., Clark, S., & Frankel, R. (2010). “I’ve heard wonderful things about you”: How patients compliment surgeons. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(5), 777–797. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01248.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D., Ranganath, R., & McFarland, D. (2009). Extracting social meaning: Identifying interactional style in spoken conversation. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 638–646). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesling, S. F. (2013). Flirting and “normative” sexualities. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 2(1), 101–121. doi:10.1075/jls.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Korobov, N. (2011). Gendering desire in speed-dating interactions. Discourse Studies, 13(4), 461–485. doi:10.1177/1461445611403357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korobov, N., & Laplante, J. (2013). Using improprieties to pursue intimacy in speed-dating interactions. Studies in Media and Communication, 1(1), 15–33. doi:10.11114/smc.v1i1.49
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2008). Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources. Text & Talk, 28(6), 723–747. doi:10.1515/TEXT.2008.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction: Studies in sociolinguistics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79–112). London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (2012). Do participants’ reports enhance conversation analytic claims? Explanations of one sort or another. Discourse Studies, 14(4), 499–505. doi:10.1177/1461445611434229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganath, R., Jurafsky, D., & McFarland, D. (2009). It’s not you, it’s me: Detecting flirting and its misperception in speed-dates. In Proceedings of the 2009 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: Volume 1 (pp. 334–342). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no type interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967. doi:10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Towards an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 161–216. doi:10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R., & Kitzinger, C. (2012). Compliments on a home birth helpline. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(3), 213–244. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.699251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer, S. A. (2012a). The interactional organization of self-praise: Epistemics, preference organisation and implications for identity research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(1), 52–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer, S. A. (2012b). Hypothetical questions: A comparative analysis and implications for ‘applied’ versus ‘basic’ conversation analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 352–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 3–26). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2010). “Have you been married, or … ?”: Eliciting and accounting for relationship histories in speed-dating interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(3), 260–282. doi:10.1080/08351813.2010.497988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303. doi:10.1177/1461445612441534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, M. T. (2003). Cyber-flirting: Playing at love on the Internet. Theory & Psychology, 13(3), 339–357. doi:10.1177/0959354303013003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182. doi:10.1177/019027250606900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar