Pitch and the Projection of More Talk

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barth-Weingarten, D. (2009). Contrasting and turn transition: Prosodic projection with parallel-opposition constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2271–2294. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth-Weingarten, D. (2012). Of ens ’n’ ands: Observations on the phonetic make-up of a coordinator and its uses in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 55(1), 35–56. doi:10.1177/0023830911428868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2015). Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 46–57. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canavan, A., Graff, D., & George, Z. (1997). CALLHOME American English speech LDC97S42. [DVD]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. doi:10.21415/T5KP54
   Google Scholar
• Caspers, J. (2003). Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 251–276. doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00007-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, F. H., & Clift, R. (2008). Unfinished turns in French conversation: Projectability, syntax and action. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(10), 1731–1752. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 551–558. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-M
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E., & Raymond, C. W. (2015). Modular pivots: A resource for extending turns at talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 388–405. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1090112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, R. (2001). Meaning in interaction: The case of actually. Language, 77(2), 245–291. doi:10.1353/lan.2001.0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., & Smiljanic, R. (2011). Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 237–245. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, B. A., & Roberts, F. (2001). Medical recommendations as joint social practice. Health Communication, 13(3), 241–260. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1303_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp. 335–376). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson’s pronunciation of English (8th ed.). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S. (2005). Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of “repetitions.” Discourse Processes, 35(1), 1–43. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3901_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82(3), 515–535. doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283–292. doi:10.1037/h0033031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 543–549. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, B. A. (2001). An exploration of prosody and turn projection in English conversation. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 287–315). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1989). Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 21–47). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, A. (2011). The additive effect of turn-taking cues in human and synthetic voice. Speech Communication, 53(1), 23–35. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2010.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasperson, R. (2002). Some linguistic aspects of closure cut-off. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 257–286). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (1962). An outline of English phonetics (9th ed.). Cambridge, England: Heffer. ( Original work published 1918)
   Google Scholar
• Kaimaki, M. (2011). Transition relevance and the phonetic design of English call openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(8), 2130–2147. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, R. (1958). The groundwork of English intonation. London, England: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levon, E. (2016). Gender, interaction and intonational variation: The discourse functions of High Rising Terminals in London. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(2), 133–163. doi:10.1111/josl.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J. (1992). Continuing and restarting. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 273–296). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J. (1996). Some aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 177–230). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J. (2004). Getting back to prior talk: And-uh(m) as a back-connecting device. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp. 377–400). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and “silences”: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9, 185–204. doi:10.1007/bf00148126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., Kelly, J., & Wells, B. (1986). Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics, 22(2), 411–437. doi:10.1017/s0022226700010859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2005). Methodological imperatives for investigating the phonetic organisation and phonological structures of spontaneous speech. Phonetica, 62(2–4), 120–130. doi:10.1159/000090093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2012). How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42(3), 255–280. doi:10.1017/s0025100312000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Wootton, A. J. (1995). Interactional and phonetic aspects of immediate echolalia in autism: A case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 9(2), 155–194. doi:10.3109/02699209508985330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(2), 93–130. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J., & Arnold, G. (1961). Intonation of colloquial English. London, England: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2001). Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1), 139–152. doi:10.1017/s0025100301001116
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2006). Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1752–1775. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. doi:10.1017/s0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plug, L. (2005). From words to actions: The phonetics of eigenlijk in two communicative contexts. Phonetica, 62(2–4), 131–145. doi:10.1159/000090094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, D. (1983). The role of intonation as a cue to turn taking in conversation. Journal of Phonetics, 11(3), 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. doi:10.1017/s0047404500001019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., … Uhmann, S. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung—Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51 (E. Couper-Kuhlen & D. Barth-Weingarten, .Trans., and adapted for English). Retrieved from www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de
   Google Scholar
• Sicoli, M. A., Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Marked initial pitch in questions signals marked communicative function. Language and Speech, 58(2), 204–223. doi:10.1177/0023830914529247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2004). Turn final intonation in English. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp. 97–117). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2009). Prosodic orientation: A practice for sequence organization in broadcast telephone openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1223–1247. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek Reed, B. (2014). Phonetic practices for action formation: Glottalization versus linking of TCU-initial vowels in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 62(1), 13–29. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2004). On some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turns in talk-in-interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp. 147–169). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2007). On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2217–2243. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2010). The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 51–72). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, T. (2014). Form ≠ function: The independence of prosody and action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.871792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, I. C. (1945). The phonetics of English (4th ed.). Cambridge, England: Heffer and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, B., & Peppé, S. (1996). Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn-taking in English dialects. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 101–130). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. C. (2006). English intonation: An introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerstrom, A., & Siegel, A. F. (2003). Keeping the floor in multiparty conversations: Intonation, syntax, and pause. Discourse Processes, 36(2), 77–107. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann, A. (2015). Functions of intonation in discourse. In M. Reed & J. Levis (Eds.), Handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 175–189). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2011a). On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), 207–229. doi:10.1017/s0025100311000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2011b). The phonetics-interaction interface in the initiation of closings in everyday English telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 1080–1099. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellers, M. (2013). Pitch and lengthening as cues to turn transition in Swedish. In F. Bimbot, C. Cerisara, C. Fougeron, G. Gravier, L. Lamel, F. Pellegrino, & P. Perrier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), 25–29 August 2013, Lyon, France (pp. 248–252).
   Google Scholar
• Zellers, M. (2016). Prosodic variation and segmental reduction and their roles in cuing turn transition in Swedish. Language and Speech. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0023830916658680
   Google Scholar