518
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Phonetic and Sequential Differences of Other-Repetitions in Repair Initiation

&

References

  • Benjamin, T. M. (2013). Signaling trouble: On the linguistic design of other-initiation of repair in English conversation ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Benjamin, T. M., & Walker, T. (2013). Managing problems of acceptability through high-rise fall repetitions. Discourse Processes, 50(2), 107–138. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.739143
  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
  • Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2015). Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 46–57. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004
  • Bolden, G. B. (2009). Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation. Communication Monographs, 76(2), 121–143. doi:10.1080/03637750902828446
  • Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 366–405). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Curl, T. S. (2005). Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of repetitions. Discourse Processes, 39(1), 1–44. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3901_1
  • de Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82(3), 515–535. doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0130
  • DuBois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805–855. doi:10.2307/415719
  • DuBois, J. W. (2003). Argument structure: Grammar in use. In J. W. DuBois, L. E. Kumpf, & W. J. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 11–61). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Enfield, N. (2013). Relationship thinking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fox, B. A. (2001). An exploration of prosody and turn projection in English conversation. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 287–315). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • French, P., & Local, J. (1983). Turn competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 701–715. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(83)90147-9
  • Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Conversational repair and human understanding. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, J. (1984). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, J., & Raymond, C. W. (2016). Are explicit apologies proportional to the offenses they address? Discourse Processes, 53(1–2), 5–25. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056695
  • Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 86–100). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
  • Kelly, J., & Local, J. (1989). On the use of general phonetic techniques in handling conversational material. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 197–212). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
  • Kurtić, E., Brown, G. J., & Wells, B. (2013). Resources for turn competition in overlapping talk. Speech Communication, 55(5), 721–743. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2012.10.002
  • Lerner, G. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Local, J., Kelly, J., & Wells, W. H. G. (1986). Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics, 22, 411–437. doi:10.1017/S0022226700010859
  • Local, J., & Walker, G. (2005). Methodological imperatives for investigating the phonetic organisation and phonological structures of spontaneous speech. Phonetica, 62, 120–130. doi:10.1159/000090093
  • Local, J., & Walker, G. (2012). How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 2(3), 255–280. doi:10.1017/S0025100312000187
  • Local, J., Wells, B., & Sebba, M. (1985). Phonology for conversation: Phonetic aspects of turn-delimitation in London Jamaican. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 309–330. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(85)90029-3
  • Ogden, R. (2001). Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1), 139–152.
  • Robinson, J. D. (2006). Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs, 73, 137–161. doi:10.1080/03637750600581206
  • Robinson, J. D. (2013). Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: The case of partial questioning repeats. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Robinson, J. D., & Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2010). Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(3), 232–259. doi:10.1080/08351813.2010.497990
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41(3–4), 235–263.
  • Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
  • Selting, M. (1996). Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., … Uhmann, S. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: Gat 2. Gespraechsforschung—Online-Zeitschrift zur Verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51.
  • Szczepek-Reed, B. (2004). Turn-final intonation in English. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (Vol. 62, pp. 97–119). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Tarplee, C. (1996). Working on young children’s utterances: Prosodic aspects of repetition during picture labelling. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 406–436). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walker, G. (2013). Phonetics and prosody in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 455–475). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Walker, G. (2016). Close proximity of turn-continuation to possible turn-completion in conversation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Wu, R.-J. R. (2006). Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes, 41(1), 67–109. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4101_5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.