Repeating a Searched-For Word With an Agreement Token in “Challenged Interaction”

References

• Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2012). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Oxford, England: Blackwell-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS–NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 534–545. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarenza, A. C. (2010). Word searches in L1 and L2 Italian conversation: Re-establishing intersubjectivity (PhD dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Emmertsen, S., & Heinemann, T. (2010). Realization as a device for remedying problems of affiliation in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(2), 109–132. doi:10.1080/08351811003738059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1986). On formal structures of practical actions. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work (pp. 160–193). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 115–130. doi:10.2307/2786746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1983). Searching for a word as an interactive activity semiotics 1981 (pp. 129–137). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 51–76. doi:10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønnum, N. (1992). The groundworks of Danish intonation: An introduction. Copenhagen, Denmark: Museum Tusculanum.
   Google Scholar
• Grønnum, N., & Tøndering, J. (2007, August). Question intonation in non-scripted Danish dialogues. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P. (1991). The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 149–181.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D., Drew, P., Elsey, C., Blackburn, D., Wakefield, S., Harkness, K., & Reuber, M. (2016). Conversational assessment in memory clinic encounters: Interactional profiling for differentiating dementia from functional memory disorders. Aging & Mental Health, 20(5), 500–509. doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1021753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurhila, S. (2007). Different orientations to grammatical correctness. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 143–158). Houndmills, England/New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (Vol. 13, pp. 238–276). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, F. (2014). A conversation-analytic study of word searches in EFL classrooms (PhD dissertation). Newcastle University, England.
   Google Scholar
• Mikesell, L. (2010). Repetitional responses in frontotemporal dementia discourse: Asserting agency or demonstrating confusion? Discourse Studies, 12(4), 465–500. doi:10.1177/1461445610370127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2011). Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 542–552. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 137–156. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Damico, J. S. (2000). Partnership in conversation: A study of word search strategies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33(3), 205–225. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00019-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2011). Validity in research on naturally occurring social interaction. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Issues of theory, method and practice (3rd ed., pp. 365–382). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967. doi:10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. doi:10.1017/S0047404506060325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation, volume II. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax (Vol. 12, pp. 261–286). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 191–227). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. doi:10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.2307/413107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation (Vol. 29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies, 6(4), 489–516. doi:10.1177/1461445604046591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taquechel-Chaigneau, R. (2014). Resolving a search for words as an interactional resource for achieving professional activity goals. Linguistica Atlantica, 33(1), 38–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (2005). The notion of member is the heart of the matter: On the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 30(1), 28–53.
   Google Scholar