Always Look on the Bright Side of Life: Making Bad News Bivalent

References

• Clayman, S. (2002). Sequence and solidarity. In E. J. Lawler & S. R. Thye (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Group cohesion, trust and solidarity (pp. 229–253). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 295–325. doi:10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Walker, T. S. (2009). Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2400–2414. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: Practices and methods. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative sociology (3rd ed., pp. 208–230). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In S. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, E. (1993). The structure of death announcements: Looking on the bright side of death. Text, 13(2), 189–212. doi:10.1515/text.1.1993.13.2.189
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of coversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441. doi:10.2307/800595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 152–205). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Deignan, J. L., Dorrani, N., Strom, S. P., Kantarci, S., Quintero-Rivera, F., … Nelson, S. F. (2014). Clinical exome sequencing for genetic identification of rare Mendelian disorders. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 312, 1880. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.14604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, E. (2005). Information, understanding and the benign order of everyday life in genetic counselling. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(5), 575–601. doi:10.1111/shil.2005.27.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (1989a). Notes on the delivery and reception of diagnostic news regarding mental disabilities. In D. Helm, A. J. M. W. T. Anderson, & A. Rawls (Eds.), The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order (pp. 54–67). New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (1989b). Perspective-display sequences in conversation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 91–113. doi:10.1080/10570318909374294
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(2), 93–130. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W., & Frankel, R. M. (2003). Indeterminacy and uncertainty in the delivery of diagnostic news in internal medicine: A single case analysis. In P. Glenn, C. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: Essays in honor of robert hopper (pp. 393–410). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mazeland, H., & Huiskes, M. (2001). Dutch “but” as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 141–169). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• McClenahen, L., & Lofland, J. (1976). Bearing bad news. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 3(3), 251–272. doi:10.1177/003803857600300301
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (1991). Hope work in the care of seriously ill patients. Qualitative Health Research, 1(4), 407–433. doi:10.1177/104973239100100402
   Google Scholar
• Pilnick, A., & Zayts, O. (2014). “It’s just a likelihood”: Uncertainty as topic and resource in conveying “positive” results in an antenatal screening clinic. Symbolic Interaction, 37(2), 187–208. doi:10.1002/symb.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2012). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Sarangi, S., & Clarke, A. (2002). Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(2), 139–171. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1988a). On an actual virtual servo-mechanism for guessing bad news: A single case conjecture. Social Problems, 35(4), 442–457. doi:10.2307/800596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1988b). Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 55–62. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(88)90019-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 161–216. doi:10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2013). Basic conversation analytic methods. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 77–99). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment and affiliation during story telling: When nodding is a token of preliminary affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. doi:10.1080/08351810701691123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universality and cultural specificity in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106(26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Timmermans, S. (2016). Negotiating the diagnostic uncertainty of genomic test results. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(3), 199–221. doi:10.1177/0190272516658770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Timmermans, S. (in press). The actionability of exome sequencing testing results. Sociology of Health & Illness.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terasaki, A. (2004a). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171–223). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Terasaki, A. (2004b). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171–219). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Buchbinder, M. (2010). Patients-in-waiting: Living between sickness and health in the genomics era. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(4), 408–423. doi:10.1177/0022146510386794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traverso, V. (2009). The dilemmas of third-party complaints in conversation between friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2385–2399. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar