The Interactional Bind of “Just [Do X]”

References

• Aijmer, K. (2005). Just and multifunctionality. In K. McCafferty, T. Bull, & K. Killie (Eds.), Contexts—Historical, social, linguistic: Studies in celebration of Toril Swan (pp. 31–48). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Munich, R. (2006). The j-word: When a word is an attitude. Menninger Perspect, 36(2), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2000). The apparently innocuous “just,” the law of levity, and the social problems of social construction. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on social problems (pp. 3–14). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, S., & Batta, A. (2010). Just doing it: Enjoying commodity fetishism with Lacan. Organization, 17(3), 345–361. doi:10.1177/1350508410363123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, C. W., Potter, J., Danby, S., Emmison, M., & Hepburn, A. (2010). Advice implicative interrogatives: Building “client-centered support” in a children’s helpline. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(3), 265–287. doi:10.1177/0190272510379838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, C. (2012). “I’m not X, I just want Y”: Formulating “wants” in interaction. Discourse Studies, 14(2), 181–196. doi:10.1177/1461445612439819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter, J. (1979). Beliefs and practical understanding. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 163–186). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Sanusi, A. L. (2000). ‘I’m just saying … ’: Discourse markers of standpoint continuity. Argumentation, 14(4), 425–445. doi:10.1023/A:1007880826834
   Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S. (2006). Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1257–1280. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1984). Speakers’ reporting in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 129–151). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2013). Conversation analysis and social action. Journal of Foreign Languages, 37(3), 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Emmison, M., Butler, C. W., & Danby, S. (2011). Script proposals: A device for empowering clients in counselling. Discourse Studies, 13(1), 3–26. doi:10.1177/1461445610387734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, R., Simpson, P., & Harvey, C. (2006). Downplaying leadership: Researching how leaders talk about themselves. Leadership, 2(4), 469–479. doi:10.1177/1742715006068936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S., & Burke, S. (2010). “Oh you don’t want asylum seekers, oh you’re just racist”: A discursive analysis of discussions about whether it’s racist to oppose asylum seeking. Discourse & Society, 21(3), 325–340. doi:10.1177/0957926509360743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugh, M. (2016). “Just kidding”: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 120–136. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Designing the recipient: Managing advice resistance in institutional settings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(2), 216–241. doi:10.1177/0190272511408055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Lindström, A. (2012). Advice giving—Terminable and interminable: The case of British health visitors. In H. Limberg & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Advice in discourse (pp. 169–193). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 359–417). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, E. J. B. (2014a). Minimising the recipient: Managing advice-resistance in ordinary talk ( Unpublished BA dissertation). University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, E. J. B. (2014b, December). Minimising the recipient: Managing advice-resistance in ordinary talk. Paper presented at the 8th Loughborough CA Day, Loughborough, Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, T. (1990). The discourse of advice giving in English: “I wouldn’t feed until spring no matter what you do.” Language & Communication, 10(4), 285–297. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(90)90014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulquist, M. P. (1985). The adverb “just” in American English usage ( Unpublished MA thesis). University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the moral order. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9(1), 47–96. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1985). On the interactional unpackaging of a “gloss.” Language in Society, 14(4), 435–466. doi:10.1017/S0047404500011465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. (1980). The analysis of conversations in which “troubles” and “anxieties” are expressed. Final report to the (British) Social Science Research Council, Ref. HR 4802. Retrieved from http://www.liso.ucsb.edu/liso_archives/Jefferson/troubles_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles-telling” and a “service encounter.” Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5), 399–422. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. (1992). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles-telling” and a “service encounter.” In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 521–548). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2014). The putative preference for offers over requests. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 87–114). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kishner, J. M., & Gibbs, R. W. (1996). How “just” gets its meanings: Polysemy and context in psychological semantics. Language and Speech, 39(1), 19–36. doi:10.1177/002383099603900102
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. A. (1987). The semantics of just. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(3), 377–398. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(87)90138-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. A. (1991). Categories in the description of just. Lingua, 83(1), 43–66. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(91)90051-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2007). The TalkBank project. In J. C. Beal, K. P. Corrigan, & H. L. Moisl (Eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora: Synchronic databases (Vol. 1, pp. 163–180). Houndmills, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, C., & Romano, M. (2012). JUST revisited: Panchronic and contrastive insights. International Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 17–36. doi:10.6018/ijes.12.1.118831
   Google Scholar
• Nevalainen, T. (1991). But, only, just: Focusing adverbial change in modern English, 1500–1900. Helsinki, Finland: Société Néophilologique.
   Google Scholar
• Pirsig, R. M. (1974). Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance: An inquiry into values. London, England: The Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 186–198. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 219–229. doi:10.1007/BF00148128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. (Ed.). (1993). Justice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, B. (1995). The construction of moral agency in the narratives of high-school drop-outs. Discourse & Society, 6(4), 495–516. doi:10.1177/0957926595006004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1986). Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics, 15(1–2), 127–138. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(86)90036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1995). Long sequences. In G. Jefferson & E. A. Schegloff (Eds.), Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II: Harvey Sacks (pp. 354–359). Oxford, England: Blackwell. ( Original work published 1971)
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1995). Pre-sequences. In G. Jefferson. & E. A. Schegloff (Eds.), Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II: Harvey Sacks (pp. 685–692). Oxford, England: Blackwell. ( Original work published 1967)
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis (pp. 191–222). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 101–134). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, S. Thompson, & E. A. Schegloff (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context. In E. H. Hovy & D. Scott (Eds.), Inter-disciplinary perspectives on discourse (pp. 3–35). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205–243. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007a). Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 433–461. doi:10.1177/1461445607079162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007b). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Lerner, G. H. (2009). Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(2), 91–115. doi:10.1080/08351810902864511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, C. (2013). Advice giving in telephone interactions between mothers and their young adult daughters ( Unpublished PhD dissertation). Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C., & Hepburn, A. (2013). Managing the moral implications of advice in informal interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 344–362. doi:10.1080/08351813.2013.839095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalicky, S., Berger, C. M., & Bell, N. D. (2015). The functions of “just kidding” in American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, 18–31. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruiell, V. (1993). The word “just”: An essay on resistance, words, and multiple meanings. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 62(3), 437–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staubach, C. N. (1946). Just a word about just. The Modern Language Journal, 30(2), 69–75. doi:10.1111/modl.1946.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 3–24). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stommel, W., & Te Molder, H. (2015). Counseling online and over the phone: When preclosing questions fail as a closing device. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 281–300. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1058605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1977). Well, what did you expect? In K. W. Whistler (Ed.), Proceedings of the third annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 506–515). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, S. (2009). Student-initiated advice in academic supervision. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(2), 163–190. doi:10.1080/08351810902864560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. (2008). “Just go”: Mathematics students’ critical awareness of routine procedure. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 8(1), 35–48. doi:10.1080/14926150802152236
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. (2007). The multi‐functionality of accounts in advice giving. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(3), 367–391. doi:10.1111/josl.2007.11.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauchope, M. M. (1993). Discourse functions of just. Lacus Forum, 19, 181–189.
   Google Scholar
• Weltman, D. (2003). The pragmatics of peremptory assertion: An ideological analysis of the use of the word “just” in local politicians’ denials of politics. Discourse & Society, 14(3), 349–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar