Grammaticalization and Bodily Action: Do They Go Together?

References

• Bowie, J. H. (2008). Proto-discourse and the emergence of compositionality. Interaction Studies, 9, 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. (1998). Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (Vol. 2, pp. 145–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. (2002). Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In T. Givón & B. F. Malle (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp. 107–134). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Condillac, E. (1746). An essay on the origin of human knowledge, being a supplement to Mr. Locke’s essay on the human understanding. London, England: J. Noursse.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, T. Q. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, T., & Malle, B. F. (2002). The evolution of language out of pre-language. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güldemann, T. (2008). Quotative Indexes in African Languages. A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Haviland, J. B. (2003). How to point in Zinancantan. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 39–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, P. (1994). Phonogenesis. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 29–45). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 155–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2018/this issue). What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51, 1–21. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (in press). The temporal organization of conversation while mucking out a sheep stable. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds), Modalities and temporalities: Convergences and divergences of bodily resources in interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. (1994). On language change: The invisible hand in language. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1964)
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology. New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. (Eds.). (1996). Grammar and interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. (1955). Philosophical writings of peirce. (J. Buchler, Ed.). New York, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (1993). Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs, 60(December 1993), 275–299.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2002). Grammars, words, and embodied meanings: On the evolution and uses of so and like. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 581–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge, England/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stukenbrock, A. (2015). Deixis in der face-to-face interaktion [Deixis in face-to-face interaction]. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, G. (2016). A million years of music: The emergence of human modernity. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tylor, E. (1856). Researches into the early history of mankind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, E. (2017). Hetero-technic cooperation with computing and non-computing technologies: A study of the transmodal capacity of prosodic cues to alleviate asymmetric access to tactile phenomena. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D. (2003). Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in sociocultural and semiotic terms). In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 171–216). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar