Polar Questions, Response Preference, and the Tasks of Political Positioning in Journalism

References

• Bolinger, D. (1957). Interrogative structures of American English. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, E., & Heritage, J. (2006). Taking the history: Questioning during comprehensive history taking. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 151–184). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, T. (1988). Parting the waters: America in the King years, 1954–1963. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (1993). Reformulating the question: A device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences. Text, 13(2), 159–188. doi:10.1515/text.1.1993.13.2.159
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (2017). The micropolitics of legitimacy: Political position-taking and journalistic scrutiny at the boundary of the mainstream. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80(1), 41–64. doi:10.1177/0190272516667705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E., Elliott, M. N., Heritage, J., & McDonald, L. (2006). Historical trends in questioning presidents, 1953–2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36, 561–583. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2014). Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & P. Drew (eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 55–86). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (2016). Political positioning sequences: The nexus of politicians, issue positions, and the sociopolitical landscape. In J. Robinson (Ed.), Accountability in interaction (pp. 141–174). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 163–198). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groeling, T. (2010). When politicians attack: Party cohesion in the media. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayano, K. (2012). Question design in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 395–414). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427–1446. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45, 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2010). Questioning in medicine. In A. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 42–68). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. E. (2013). The changing tenor of questioning over time: Tracking a question form across U.S. presidential news conferences, 1953–2000. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 481–501.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J. P. De Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., Robinson, J. D., Elliott, M. N., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(10), 1429–1433. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcription symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2002). A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1851–1877. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00057-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam, TheNetherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55, 360–373. doi:10.1080/03637758809376177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, C., W., & Clark White, A. E. (2017). Time reference in the service of social action. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80(2), 109–131. doi:10.1177/0190272516689468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967. doi:10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in Anaphora (pp. 437–85). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T.,… Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society, 39, 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0047404509990637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2007). Alternative recognitionals in person reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 73–96). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terasaki, A. K. (2004). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171–223). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar