Sequence Initiation or Self-Talk? Commenting on the Surroundings While Mucking out a Sheep Stable

References

• Bergmann, J. (1990). On the local sensitivity of conversation. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 201–282). Hertfordshire, England: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2015). The Coordination of talk and touch in adults directives to children: Touch and social control. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 152–175. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1025501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2010). Commentary on Stivers and Rossano: Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 32–37. doi:10.1080/08351810903471316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, M. (1997). Schisming: The collaborative transformation from single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(1), 1–51. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3001_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds). (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Stivers, T. (1999). Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 1501–1517. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00219-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2015). Lapses: How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 430–453. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1090116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ’standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In P. Bull & R. Derek (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 166–196). Clevendon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. (2014). From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 86–105. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2003). From interaction to grammar: Estonian finite verb forms in conversation. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 34.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2018). The temporal organization of conversation while mucking out a sheep stable. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Modalities and temporalities: Convergences and divergences of bodily resources in interaction (pp. 97–122). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Keisanen, T. (2012). “Uh-oh, we were going there”: Environmentally occasioned noticings of trouble in in-car interaction. Semiotica, 191, 199–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. (2009). Gaze shift as an interactional resource for very young children. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 145–160. doi:10.1080/01638530902728926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laanesoo, K., & Keevallik, L. (2017). Noticing breaches with non-polar interrogatives: Estonian kes ‘who’ ascribing responsibility for problematic conduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(3), 286–306. doi:10.1080/08351813.2017.1340721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. (2010). Self, sequence and the senses: Universal and culture-specific aspects of conversational organization in a Wolof social space. Germany: Habilitationsschrift. Eingereicht an der Fakultät für Soziologie der Universität Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2011). The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. Le Baron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 207–226). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2012). Talking and driving: Multi-activity in the car. Semiotica, 191, 223–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity: Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 33–75). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mushin, I., & Gardner, R. (2009). Silence is talk: Conversational silence in Australian aboriginal talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 2033–2052. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet-Shore, D. (2017). Preference organization. In J. Nussbaum (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.132
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Lerner, G. (2014). A body and its involvements: Adjusting action for dual involvements. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 227–246). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308–329). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation [1964–1972] (Vol. 1 & 2). Cambridge, England: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. doi:10.1525/aa.1968.70.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew & A. J. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89–135). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. doi:10.1080/08351810903471258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski, M. H. (1999). Re-engaging and disengaging talk in activity. Language in Society, 28(1), 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0047404599001013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar