Interaction at the Boundaries of a World Known in Common: Initiating Repair with “What Do You Mean?”

References

• Bolden, G. B. (2018). Speaking ‘out of turn’: Epistemics in action in other-initiated repair. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 142–162. doi:10.1177/1461445617734346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69–101. doi:10.1016/S0378–2166(97)89759–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2002). Out of context: An intersection between domestic life and the workplace, as contexts for (business) talk. Language & Communication, 22(4), 477–494. doi:10.1016/S0271–5309(02)00021–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2003). Precision and exaggeration in interaction. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 917–938. doi:10.2307/1519751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2018). Epistemics in social interaction. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 163–187. doi:10.1177/1461445617734347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of and experiments with “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 187–209). New York, NY: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (2013). Conversational repair and human understanding: An introduction. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 1–40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society, 27(03), 291–334. doi:10.1017/S0047404500019990
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2008). Conversation analysis as social theory. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 300–320). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444304992.ch15
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2013). Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 551–578. doi:10.1177/1461445613501449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2015). Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, 88–104. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2018). The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the ‘epistemics of epistemics’ group. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 14–56. doi:10.1177/1461445617734342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J. P. De Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179–192). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics, 1(1). doi:10.2478/opli–2014–0009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/sidag.16
   Google Scholar
• Local, J. (1996). Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 177–230). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79–112). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2013). At the intersection of turn and sequence organization: On the relevance of “slots” in type-conforming responses to polar interrogatives. In B. Szczepek Reed & G. Raymond (Eds.), Units of talk – Units of action (pp. 169–206). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/slsi.25.06ray
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2018). Which Epistemics? Whose conversation analysis? Discourse Studies, 20(1), 57–89. doi:10.1177/1461445617734343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(05), 677–705. doi:10.1017/S0047404506060325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2010). Grammar and social relations: Grammar as a constitutive feature of conversational and institutional activities. In A. Freed and S. Erlich (Eds.), Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 87–107). Oxford, England: University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1978). Some technical considerations of a Dirty Joke. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 249–270). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1984). On doing “being ordinary”. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413–429). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. doi:10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–545. doi:10.1080/01638539709545001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2005). On complainability. Social Problems, 52(4), 449–476. doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). London, England: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511791208
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Lerner, G. H. (2009). Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to Wh-questions. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42, 91–115. doi:10.1080/08351810902864511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2012). Declaratives, questioning, defeasibility. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 53–60. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2014). The architecture of intersubjectivity revisited. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 364–399). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar