Classroom Interaction Research: The State of the Art

References

• Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2011). Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 42–65. doi:10.1093/applin/amr031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allwright, D. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2, 156–171. doi:10.1093/applin/5.2.156
   Google Scholar
• Allwright, D. (2005). From teaching points to learning opportunities and beyond. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 9–32. doi:10.2307/3588450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. C. (1979). The formal basis for a contextually sensitive classroom agenda. Instructional Science, 8(1), 43–65. doi:10.1007/BF00054981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, A., & Church, A. (Eds.). (2016). Children’s knowledge-in-interaction: Studies in conversation analysis. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J. (2008). Displaying orientation in the classroom: Students’ multimodal responses to teacher instructions. Linguistics and Education, 19(2), 166–178. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Björk-Willén, P. (2007). Participation in multilingual preschool play: Shadowing and crossing as interactional resources. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2133–2158. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. doi:10.1093/applin/1.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62. doi:10.1111/modl.2007.91.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2008). Soliciting teacher attention in an L2 classroom: Affect displays, classroom artefacts, and embodied action. Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 26–48. doi:10.1093/applin/amm057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1966). Topics in the theory of generative grammar. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Danby, S. J., Thompson, C., Theobald, M. A., & Thorpe, K. J. (2012). Children’s strategies for making friends when starting school. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(2), 63–71. doi:10.1177/183693911203700210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 2016), 19–47. doi:10.1111/modl.12301
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, England: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S., & Majlesi, A. (2018). Learnables and teachables in second language talk: Advancing a social reconceptualization of central SLA tenets. Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement 2018), 3–10. doi:10.1111/modl.v102.S1
   Google Scholar
• Evnitskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ multimodal displays of willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94. doi:10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasel Lauzon, V., & Berger, E. (2015). The multimodal organization of speaker selection in classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 31, 14–29. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. doi:10.1111/modl.1997.81.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402–430. doi:10.1093/applin/ami014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2012). Conversation analysis in the classroom context. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 593–611). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2015). Summons turns: The business of securing a turn in busy classrooms. In P. Seedhouse & C. Jenks (Eds.), International perspectives on ELT classroom interaction (pp. 28–48). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R., & Mushin, I. (2017). Epistemic trajectories in the classroom: How children respond in informing sequences. In A. Bateman & A. Church (Eds.), Children’s knowledge in interaction (pp. 13–36). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29–45. doi:10.1080/19463014.2012.666022
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. (1997). Apples and oranges: Or, why apples are not oranges and don’t need to be. The Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 83–90. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb02597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2013). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K. (1995). ‘Aw, man, where we goin?’: Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K. (1999). The prosaics of interaction: The development of interactional competence. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Another language. In culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 137–151). Cambridge, England: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K. (2018). From L2 interactional competence to L2 interactional repertoires: Reconceptualising the objects of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K. (2019). The contributions of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to a usage-based understanding of language: Expanding the transdisciplinary framework. The Modern Language Journal, 103(Supplement 2019), 80–94. doi:10.1111/modl.12535
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (Eds). (2011). L2 interactional competence and development. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen-Thomas, H., & Langman, J. (2017). Deictics and the construction of mathematics and science knowledge in the secondary school classroom. Classroom Discourse, 8(2), 122–138. doi:10.1080/19463014.2017.1328698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, A. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 568–582. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-4781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heap, J. L. (1982). Understanding classroom events: A critique of Durkin, with an alternative. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(4), 391–411. doi:10.1080/10862968209547466
   Google Scholar
• Heller, V. (2016). Meanings at hand: Coordinating semiotic resources in explaining mathematical terms in classroom discourse. Classroom Discourse, 7(3), 253–275. doi:10.1080/19463014.2016.1207551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, V. (2017). Managing knowledge claims in classroom discourse: The public construction of a homogeneous epistemic status. Classroom Discourse, 8(2), 156–174. doi:10.1080/19463014.2017.1328699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. (2006). Classroom interactive practices for developing L2 Literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 377–404. doi:10.1093/applin/ami052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. (2009). Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of English. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 113–132. doi:10.1080/00313830902757550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. (2011). Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In H. Hall & P. Doehler (Eds.), (pp. 147–172). doi:10.1177/1753193410384697
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. (2018). Language as competencing: Considering language learning as enactment. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 40–56. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1433052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). On the contingent nature of language-learning tasks. Classroom Discourse, 1(1), 25–45. doi:10.1080/19463011003750657
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, S., & Francis, D. (1995). Words and pictures: Collaborative storytelling in a primary classroom. Research in Education, 53(1), 65–88. doi:10.1177/003452379505300107
   Google Scholar
• Hester, S., & Francis, D. (1997). Reality analysis in a classroom storytelling. The British Journal of Sociology, 48, 95–112. doi:10.2307/591912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Y. (2016). Teacher deployment of ‘oh’ in known-answer question sequences. Classroom Discourse, 7(1), 58–84. doi:10.1080/19463014.2015.1099111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustler, D. E., & Payne, G. (1982). Power in the classroom. Research in Education, 28(1), 49–64. doi:10.1177/003452378202800105
   Google Scholar
• Huth, T. (2011). Conversation analysis and language classroom discourse. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(5), 297–309. doi:10.1111/lnco.2011.5.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T. (2018a). The environment of a bilingual classroom as an interactional resource. Linguistics and Education, 44, 20–30. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T. (2018b). Professional embodiment: Walking, re-engagement of desk interactions, and provisions of instruction during classroom rounds. Applied Linguistics, amy034. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/10.1093/applin/amy034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2013). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94. doi:10.1093/applin/amt031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. (2012). Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(2), 166–186. doi:10.1080/19463014.2012.716624
   Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. (2014). From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 86–105. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L., Kasper, G., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2018). Explaining Hooke’s Law: Definitional practices in a CLIL physics classroom. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 694–717. doi:10.1093/applin/amw025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L., & Piirainen–Marsh, A. (2013). Manual guiding in peer group interaction: A resource for organizing a practical classroom task. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(4), 322–343. doi:10.1080/08351813.2013.839094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation‐for‐learning. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 551–567. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-4781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., & Ohlhus, S. (2017). Editorial to special issue ‘The social organisation of learning in classroom interaction and beyond’. Classroom Discourse, 8(2), 95–98. doi:10.1080/19463014.2017.1328702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, D., Malabarba, T., & Hall, J. K. (2018). Data collection considerations for classroom interaction research: A conversation analytic perspective. Classroom Discourse, 9(3), 185–204. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1485589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. (2007). Parallel activities in the classroom. Language and Education, 21(6), 487–501. doi:10.2167/le713.0
   Google Scholar
• Koole, T. (2012). The epistemics of student problems: Explaining mathematics in a multi-lingual class. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1902–1916. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. (2013). Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encylopedia of applied linguistics. Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0208
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372. doi:10.1111/modl.1986.70.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunitz, S. (2018). Collaborative attention work on gender agreement in Italian as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement 2018), 64–81. doi:10.1111/modl.v102.S1
   Google Scholar
• Kunitz, S., & Marian, K. (2017). Tracking immanent language learning behavior over time in task-based classroom work. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 507–535. doi:10.1002/tesq.2017.51.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2017). Multimodal turn allocation in ESL peer group discussions. Social Semiotics, 27(5), 671–692. doi:10.1080/10350330.2016.1207353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-A. (2006). Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 691–713. doi:10.2307/40264304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 180–206. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and value. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 318–323. doi:10.1111/modl.1997.81.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 357–371. doi:10.1111/modl.1998.82.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D. (1998). Demonstrating physics lessons. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 269–298). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. (2001). On ‘reflexivity’ in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(1), 35–68. doi:10.1177/107780040100700103
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. (2011). Understanding understanding as an instructional matter. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 438–451. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majlesi, A. (2018). Instructed vision: Navigating grammatical rules by using landmarks for linguistic structures in corrective feedback sequences. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 11–29. doi:10.1111/modl.v102.S1
   Google Scholar
• Majlesi, A. R., & Broth, M. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 193–207. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margutti, P., & Drew, P. (2014). Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction. Language and Education, 28(5), 436–458. doi:10.1080/09500782.2014.898650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, N. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second language acquisition studies. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427. doi:10.1093/applin/amm052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, N. (2015). Giving and following pedagogical instructions in task-based instruction: An ethnomethodological perspective. In C. Jenks & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), International perspectives on ELT classroom interaction (pp. 110–128). New York, NY: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N., & Kunitz, S. (2013). Doing planning and task performance in second language acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification. Language Learning, 63(4), 629–664. doi:10.1111/lang.2013.63.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, N., & Kunitz, S. (2015). CA-for-SLA studies of classroom interaction: Quo vadis? In N. Markee (Ed.), The Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 425–441). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. W. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7(2), 183–213. doi:10.1017/S0047404500005522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. W. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19(3), 349–377. doi:10.1017/S004740450001455X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. W., & Watson, D. R. (1984). Two axes for the analysis of ‘commonsense ‘and ‘formal ‘geographical knowledge in classroom talk. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(3), 281–302. doi:10.1080/0142569840050305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Melander, H., & Sahlström, F. (2009). In tow of the blue whale: Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1519–1537. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalovich, A., & Netz, H. (2018). Tag-naxon? (Tag-right?) in instructional talk: Opening of blocking learning opportunities. Journal of Pragmatics, 137, 57–75. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-4781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk‐in‐interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 323–347. doi:10.1093/applin/23.3.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, J. (2004a). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-4781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, J. (2004b). Pursuit of understanding: Rethinking ‘negotiation of meaning’ in view of projected action. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 157–177). London, England: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. (2008). Selecting next speaker in the second language classroom: How to find a willing next speaker in planned activities. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. (2009). Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 491–515. doi:10.1080/01638530902959463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41(2), 136–145. doi:10.1093/elt/41.2.136
   Google Scholar
• Pallotti, G. (2001). External appropriations as a strategy for participating in intercultural multi-party conversations. In A. Di Luzio, S. Gunthner, & F. Orletti (Eds.), Culture in communication (pp. 295–334). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, G., & Cuff, E. (Eds.). (1982). Doing teaching: The practical management of classrooms. London, England: Batsford Academic and Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, G., & Hustler, D. (1980). Teaching the class: The practical management of a cohort. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(1), 49–66. doi:10.1080/0142569800010104
   Google Scholar
• Payne, G., & Ridge, E. (1985). Let them talk. An alternative approach to language development in the infant school. In E. Cuff & G. Payne (Eds.), Crisis in the curriculum (pp. 11–32). Abingdon, England: Taylor Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., & Fasel Lauzon, V. (2015). Documenting change across time: Longitudinal and cross-sectional CA studies of classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 409–424). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing ‘methods’ for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In J.K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S.Pekarek- Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 206–243). Clevendon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–268). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Petitjean, C. (2014). Social representations of turn-taking in classrooms: From compulsory to post-compulsory schooling in French-speaking Switzerland. Classroom Discourse, 5(2), 138–157. doi:10.1080/19463014.2013.823350
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T. (1987). Second-language acquisition, social interaction and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 3–21. doi:10.1093/applin/8.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). A participant’s perspective on tasks: From task instruction, through pre-task planning, to task accomplishment. Novitas-ROYAL, 5(1), 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Edited by Gail Jefferson with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlström, J. (2002). The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, J. (2011). Learning as social action. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S.Pekarek- Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 45–65). Clevendon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226. doi:10.1017/S0267190500002476
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2010, December 2–4). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J. W. Sew, … I. Walker (Eds.). Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010 (721–737). Singapore: National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. (1996a). Classroom interaction: Possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50(1), 16–24. doi:10.1093/elt/50.1.16
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. (1996b). Learning talk. A study of the interactional architecture of the L2 classroom from a CA institutional discourse perspective ( Unpublished PhD thesis). University of York, York, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis and language teaching. Language Teaching, 38, 165–187. doi:10.1017/S0261444805003010
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. (2013). ‘Epistemic status check’ as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 45(PartA), 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O., & Walsh, S. (2013). The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms. Language and Education, 27(6), 542–565. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.739174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharrock, W., & Anderson, R. (1982). Talking and teaching: Reflective comments on in-classroom activities. In G. Payne & E. Cuff (Eds.), Doing teaching: The practical management of classrooms (pp. 170–183). London, England: Batsford Academic and Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards and analysis of discourse. Oxford, England: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Speier, M. (1976). The child as conversationalist: Some culture contact features of conversational interaction between adults and children. In M. Hammersley & P. Woods (Eds.), The process of schooling (pp. 98–103). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. London, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). London, England: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577–594. doi:10.1111/modl.2008.92.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation‐Response‐Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. doi:10.1111/lang.2009.59.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H. (2011). Learner initiatives and learning opportunities in the language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(2), 201–218. doi:10.1080/19463014.2011.614053
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. (2014). Turn allocation and context: Broadening participation in the second language classroom. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Discourse in context: Contemporary applied linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 301–320). London, England: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, A. (2017). Developing L2 interactional competence: Increasing participation through self-selection in post-expansion sequences. Classroom Discourse, 8(3), 271–293. doi:10.1080/19463014.2017.1354310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 1–37. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. (2000). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 244–267. doi:10.1093/applin/21.2.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J., & Waring, H. (2008). ‘Very good’ as a teacher response. ELT Journal, 63(3), 195–203. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R. (1999). Sociolinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 105–132. doi:10.1017/S0267190599190068
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. (2003). Learning to talk the talk and walk the walk: Interactional competence in academic spoken English. North Eastern Illinois University Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 26–44.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R., & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 519–535. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-4781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar