Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy: Identifying Transformative Sequences

References

• Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 26–42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 627–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bänninger-Huber, E., & Widmer, C. (1999). Affective relationship patterns and psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy Research, 9(1), 74–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro, M. (2008). Clients’ responses to therapists’ reinterpretations. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 43–61). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro, M. (2013). Supra-session courses of action in psychotherapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 118–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. (1992). Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 137–162). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. R. (2016). Making mental disorders visible: proto-morality as diagnostic resource in psychiatric exploration. In M. O’Reilly & J. N. Lester (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of adult mental health (pp. 247–268). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden & Angell. (2017). The organisation of the treatment recommendation phase in routine psyciatric visits. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholtz, M. B., Spiekermann, J., & Kächele, H. (2015). Rhythm and blues–Amalie’s 152nd session: From psychoanalysis to conversation and metaphor analysis–And back again. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96(3), 877–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, M. B., & Kächele, H. (2017). From turn-by-turn to larger chunks of talk: An exploratory study in psychotherapeutic micro-processes using conversation analysis. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 20(3), 161–178.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (1986). The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy 1. Sociology of Health & Illness, 8(1), 44–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekberg, K., & LeCouteur, A. (2015). Clients’ resistance to therapists’ proposals: Managing epistemic and deontic status. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekberg, S., Barnes, R., Kessler, D., Malpass, A., & Shaw, A. (2013). Managing the therapeutic relationship in online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: Therapists’ treatment of clients’ contributions. Language@ Internet, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg, S., Shaw, A. R., Kessler, D. S., Malpass, A., & Barnes, R. K. (2016). Orienting to emotion in computer-mediated cognitive behavioral therapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 310–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Introduction: Human sociality as a new interdisciplinary field. In S.C. Levinson & N.J. Enfield (Eds.), Roots of human sociality. Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 1–38). Oxford, England: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, P. (2013). Therapy talk: Conversation analysis in practice. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. Theoretical sociology: perspectives and developments (pp. 338–386). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American sociological association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, 29, 159–183.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Atkison, M. (1984). Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson, J. Heritage, & K. Oatley (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 1–15). Cambrdige, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. C., & Watson, D. R. (1980). Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed. Semiotica, 30(3–4), 245–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2005). ‘Active listening’: Formulations and the elicitation of feelings- talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 303–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 63–92). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavelle, M., Healey, P. G., & McCabe, R. (2014). Participation during first social encounters in schizophrenia. PloS One, 9(1), e77506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, G. (2009). The pragmatics of therapeutic interaction: An empirical study. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90(5), 1075–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson S. C. (2012). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human “interaction engine”. In S. C. Levinson & N. J. Enfield (Eds.), Roots of human sociality. Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 39–69). Oxford, England: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• MacMartin, C. (2008). Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 80–99). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A. (2015). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy process research. In O. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research (pp. 501–515). Vienna, Austria: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A., Widdicombe, S., & Barkham, M. (2001). The potential of conversation analysis for psychotherapy research. Counseling Psychologist, 29(3), 413–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, R., Skelton, J., Heath, C., Burns, T., & Priebe, S. (2002). Engagement of patients with psychosis in the consultation: Conversation analytic study. British Medical Journal, 325(7373), 1148–1151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCabe, R., Sterno, I., Priebe, S., Barnes, R., & Byng, R. (2017). How do healthcare professionals interview patients to assess suicide risk? BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikesell, L., & Bromley, E. (2016). Exploring the heterogeneity of ‘schizophrenic speech’. In M. O’Reilly & J. N. Lester (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of adult mental health (pp. 329–351). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P. (2013). Resistance in couples counselling: Sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 49(1), 18–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P. (2016). Storytelling, depression, and psychotherapy. In M. O’Reilly & J. N. Lester (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of adult mental health (pp. 577–596). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., & Horvath, A. O. (2014a). “I can see some sadness in your eyes”: When experiential therapists notice a client’s affectual display. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 89–108. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., & Horvath, A. O. (2014b). The therapeutic relationship in action: How therapists and clients co-manage relational disaffiliation. Psychotherapy Research, 24(3), 327–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., Knight, N., Watkins, A., Horvath, A. O., & Angus, L. (2013). Active retreating: Person-centered practices to repair disaffiliation in therapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 53, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., & Gonzáles-Martínez, E. (eds.). (2018). Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. London, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2004). Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: A conversation analytic view. Psychotherapy Research, 14(3), 289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2005). Patients’ responses to interpretations. A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory. Communication & Medicine, 2 (2): 163–176.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2011). After interpretation: Third-position utterances in psychoanalysis. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 44(3), 288–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2012). Die Interaktionsgeschichte einer Deutung. In R. Ayass & C. Meyer (Eds.), Sozialität in slow motion Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven (pp. 375–405). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2013). Conversation analysis in psychotherapy. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Handbook in conversation analysis (pp. 551–574). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S., & Leudar, I. (2008a). Analysing psychotherapy in practice. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 5–25). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S. & Leudar, I. (Eds.). (2008b). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pittenger, R. E., Hockett, C. F., & Danehy, J. J. (1960). The first five minutes: A sample of microscopic interview analysis. Ithaca, NY: Paul Martineau.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, A., Chaplin, R., Lelliott, P., & Seale, C. (2012). How pressure is applied in shared decisions about antipsychotic medication: A conversation analytic study of psychiatric outpatient consultations. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(1), 95–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, J. (2008). Lexical substitution as a therapeutic resource. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 62–79). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(3), 284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savander, E. È., Weiste, E., Hintikka, J., Leiman, M., Valkeapää, T., Heinonen, E. O., & Peräkylä, A. (2019). Offering patients opportunities to reveal their subjective experiences in psychiatric assessment interviews. Patient Education and Counseling. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheflen, A. E. (1973). Communicational structure: Analysis of a psychotherapy transaction. Bloomington, ID: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., Himberg, T., Niinisalo, M., Kahri, M., Peräkylä, A., Sams, M., & Hari, R. (2017). Sequentiality, mutual visibility, and behavioral matching: Body sway and pitch register during joint decision making. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 33–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations. Language in Society, 43(2), 185–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B., Elliott, R., Llewelyn, S. P., Firth‑Cozens, J. A., Margison, F. R., Shapiro, D. A., & Hardy, G. (1990). Assimilation of problematic experiences by clients in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 411–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, O., Peräkylä, A., & Elliott, R. (2014). Conversation analysis of the two-chair self-soothing task in emotion-focused therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 24(6), 738–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., & McCabe, R. (2018). How psychiatrists recommend treatment and its relationship with patient uptake. Health Communication, 33(11), 1345–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction. Text, 23(4), 573–606.
   Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2010a). Recognition and interpretation: Responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 85–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2010b). Professional non‐neutrality: Criticising the third party in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(5), 798–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2010c). Misalignment as a therapeutic resource. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(4), 299–315.
   Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2011). Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 348–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Rossano, F., & Peräkylä, A. (2018). Conversation analysis and psychotherapeutic change. In S. Pekarek-Doehler, J. Wagner & E. Gonzáles-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 225–254). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Weiste, E., & Peräkylä, A. (2013). A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiste, E., & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Prosody and empathic communication in psychotherapy interaction. Psychotherapy Research, 24(6), 687–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiste, E., Voutilainen, L., & Peräkylä, A. (2016). Epistemic asymmetries in psychotherapy interaction: Therapists’ practices for displaying access to clients’ inner experiences. Sociology of Health and Illness, 38(4), 645–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar