Click-Initiated Self-Repair in Changing the Sequential Trajectory of Actions-in-Progress

References

• Auer, P. (2005). Delayed self-repairs as a structuring device for complex turns in conversation. In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation (pp. 75–102). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, E. (2008). Grammar and interaction: Pivots in German conversation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, F. H. G., & Clift, R. (2008). Unfinished turns in French conversation: Project ability, syntax and action. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(10), 1731–1752. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1999). Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk, & E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. pp.11–33). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2007). Assessing and accounting. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (pp. 81–119). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). “Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., Walker, T., & Ogden, R. (2013). Self-repair and action construction. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, H. (1999). Features of request strategies in Chinese. Working papers. Lund University, 47, 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gimson, A. (1970). An introduction to the pronunciation of English (2nd ed.). London, England: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 272–302. doi:10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1986). Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 29–49. doi:10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–55. doi:10.1075/iprapip
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (2004). Participation. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Maldan, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 303–317. doi:10.1111/soin.1980.50.issue-3-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. New York, NY: PolityPress.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, J. T. (1996). Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (Eds.), Natural histories of discourse (pp. 131–159). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, S. (2011). The multimodal mechanics of collaborative unit construction in Japanese conversation. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 106–120). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasperson, R. (2002). Some linguistic aspects of closure cut-off. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 257–286). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 2, 181–199. doi:10.1017/S0047404500004334
   Google Scholar
• Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2015). How listeners use facial expression to shift the emotional stance of the speaker’s utterance. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 319–341. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1058607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2012). Compromising progressivity: ‘no’-prefacing in Estonian. Pragmatics, 22(1), 119–146. doi:10.1075/prag.22.1.05kee
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P. (1982). A course in phonetics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P., & Traill, A. (1984). Linguistic phonetic descriptions of clicks. Language, 60, 1–20. doi:10.2307/414188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Wong, S. M. (1994a). Qing/please—A polite or request marker? Observations from Chinese. Multilingua, 13(4), 343–360. doi:10.1515/mult.1994.13.4.343
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Wong, S. M. (1994b). Imperatives in requests: Direct or impolite—Observations from Chinese. Pragmatics, 4, 491–515. doi:10.1075/prag.4.4.01lee
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1989). Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(2), 167–177. doi:10.1080/10570318909374298
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H., & Raymond, G. (2017). On the practical re-intentionalization of body behavior: Action pivots in the progressive realization of embodied conduct. In G. Raymond, G. H. Lerner, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Enabling human conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff (pp. 299–313). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2014a). Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 67, 34–60. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2014b). Multimodality, interaction and turn-taking in Mandarin conversation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2016). Some interactional uses of syntactically incomplete turns in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse, 7(2), 237–271. doi:10.1075/cld.7.2.03li
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Q.-Z. (1986). [Xiandai hanyu pianzhangzhong de lianjie chengfen] “Connectives in Modern Chinese Discourse”. Zhongguo Yuwen, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., Kelly, J., & Wells, B. (1986). Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics, 22, 411–437. doi:10.1017/S0022226700010859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, J. (2016). Delicate matters: Embedded self-correction as a method for adjusting possibly available inapposite hearings. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Social accountability in interaction (pp. 108–137). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. (2016). Defending solidarity self-repair on behalf of other-attentiveness. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Social accountability in interaction (pp. 73–107). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazeland, H. (2007). Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1816–1869. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. doi:10.1017/S0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2018). The actions of peripheral linguistic objects: Clicks. In J. Ginzburg & C. Pelachaud (Eds.), Proceedings of laughter workshop 2018 (pp. 2–5). Paris, France: Sorbonne Université.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2020). Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to a syntax for conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and syntax vol (pp. 261–286). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., … Uhmann, S. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT2 (E. Couper-Kuhlen & D. Barth-Weingarten, Trans.) Gesprächsforschung-Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Skewis, M. (2003). Mitigated directness in Hongloumeng: Directive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth century Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(2), 161–189. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00084-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, L. (1995). Repair in natural conversation of Beijing Mandarin conversation. The Yuen Ren Society Treasury of Chinese Dialect Data, 1, 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Trouvain, J., & Malisz, Z. (2016). Inter-speech clicks in an interspeech keynote. INTERSPEECH, 2016, 1397–1401.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2013). Phonetics and prosody in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 455–474). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2005). Studies of the phonetics–interaction interface: Clicks and interactional structures in English conversation. ( Ph.D. thesis). University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2007). Clicks as markers of new sequences in English conversation. 16th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI) (pp. 1069–1072), Saarbrucken. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2011a). On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), 207–229. doi:10.1017/S0025100311000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2011b). The phonetics–Interaction interface in the initiation of closings in everyday English telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 1080–1099. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J.-Y. (2007). [Yuqi zhuci ‘Bei’ de qingtai jieshi] “On the modal meaning of sentence-final particle bei”. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu, 3, 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, S.-C., & Sun, J. (2009). [‘Na’ zi yingda ju] “Na-prefaced responses”. Yuyan Wenzi Yingyong, 2009(1), 60–68.
   Google Scholar