Audibly Not Saying Something with Clicks

References

• Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 months. Lund, Sweden: Lunds Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Andrén, M. (2014). Multimodal constructions in children: Is the headshake part of language? Gesture, 2(2014), 141–170. doi:10.1075/gest.14.2.02and
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, K., Schembri, A., & Woll, B. (2010). Diversity across sign languages and spoken languages: Implications for language universals. Lingua, 120(12), 2664–2667. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English speech rhythm. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012). Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 113–146). Oxford, England/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 12(12), 1–51. Retrieved from www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Walker, T. (2009). Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2400–2414. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T. (2008). Questions of accountability: Yes–no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 55–71. doi:10.1177/1461445607085590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2014). Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 175–200. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language. Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–95). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organisation of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441. doi:10.2307/800595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen, E., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers. Discourse Studies, 14(5), 587–611. doi:10.1177/1461445612454069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Torreira, F. (2015). The Timing and Construction of Preference: A Quantitative Study. Discourse Processes, 52, 255–289. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177–201. doi:10.1017/S004740450332202X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Chichester, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2020). Click-initiated self-repair in changing the sequential trajectory of actions-in-progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 90–117.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2012). How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42(3), 255–280. doi:10.1017/S0025100312000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehr, D. (2007). Aspects of rhythm in gesture and speech. Gesture, 7(2), 179–214. doi:10.1075/gest.7.2.04loe
   Google Scholar
• Loehr, D. P. (2012). Temporal, structural, and pragmatic synchrony between intonation and gesture. Laboratory Phonology, 3, 71–89. doi:10.1515/lp-2012-0006
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2016a). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. doi:10.1111/josl.1_12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2016b). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Retrieved from: https://franzoesistik.philhist.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/franzoesistik/mondada_multimodal_conventions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction. Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research in Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2012). Prosodies in conversation. In O. Niebuhr (Ed.), Prosodies – Context, function and communication (pp. 201–208). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43, 3. doi:10.1017/S0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2018). The actions of peripheral linguistic objects: Clicks. In J. Ginzburg & C. Pelachaud (Eds.), Proceedings of Laughter Workshop 2018 (pp. 2–5). Paris, France. http://pages.isir.upmc.fr/~pelachaud/site/proceedings-Laughter18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R., & Hawkins, S. (2014). Entrainment as a basis for co-ordinated actions in speech. In Proceedings of ICPhS XXVIII. Glasgow. Retrieved from https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/proceedings.html
   Google Scholar
• Paschen, L. (2019). On clicks in russian everyday communication. In N. Thieliemann & N. Richter (Eds.), Urban voices: The sociolinguistic, grammar and pragmatics of spoken Russian (pp. 237–257). Vienna, Austria: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P. (2018, June). Why we should study multimodal language. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, D., & Vigil, D. (2019). Searches and clicks in Peninsular Spanish. Pragmatics, 1, 83–105. doi:10.1075/prag.18020.pin
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79–112). New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, P., Puglesi, C., Borràs-Comes, J., Arroyo, E., & Blat, J. (2015). Exploring the contribution of prosody and gesture to the perception of focus using an animated agent. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 41–54. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 829–842. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, W. (2018, October). The body as evidence for the nature of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1782. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2018.01782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Lerner, G. H. (2009). Beginning to respond: Well -prefaced responses to wh -questions. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42(2), 91–115. doi:10.1080/08351810902864511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scobbie, J. M., Schaeffler, S., & Mennen, I. 2011. Audible aspects of speech preparation. 17th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, 1782–1785.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 38(2), 131–158. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. doi:10.1080/08351810701691123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35, 367–392. doi:10.1017/S0047404506060179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouvain, J. (2014). Laughing, breathing, clicking - The prosody of nonverbal vocalisations. Speech Prosody, (2014, 598–602.
   Google Scholar
• Trouvain, J. (2015). On clicks in German. In A. Leemann, M.-J. Kolly, S. Schmid & V. Dellwo (Eds), Trends in phonetics and phonology. Studies from German Speaking Europe, (pp. 21–33). Frankfurt, Germany: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2005). Studies of the phonetics-interaction interface: Clicks and interactional structures in English conversation (PhD). York, England: University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2011a). The phonetics–Interaction interface in the initiation of closings in everyday English telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 1080–1099. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2011b). On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), 207–229. doi:10.1017/S0025100311000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar